![]() The guy with the burnt balls got on the plane with the device in a different country. If I hop a plane from Toronto to Cleveland, Toronto lets me on with a miniature nuke, and I bake Drew's cookies over Cleveland, how does that reflect on US security in any way? I would never suggest that TSA isn't totally theater with the side benefit of conditioning citizens to obey preposterous directives from uniformed functionaries without question. TSA has fucked up six ways from sunday, but I can't see this being one of them. YMMV.
|
|
![]() before you can board a plane in T.O. bound for a US destination. AFAIK, this is true for all airports in the world with flights to US destinations; if you're not willing to let Total Security Awareness^W^W^WThe Transportation Safety Administration in, you don't get to HAVE flights with US destinations. So yeah... it is in fact your problem.
|
|
![]() I haven't been out of the country since the TSA idiots got into the act. The last time I went through Toronto, I went through customs where they were only interested in what we bought there (they tossed my wife's purse for receipts) and the rest was normal airline boarding. Oh well. Entropy increases.
|
|
![]() and TSA doesn't screen outside US.
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
|
|
![]() http://www.tsa.gov/b...est-airlines.html
Q: What additional security measures are being taken for international flights to U.S. destinations? FWIW. Cheers, Scott. |
|
![]() They issued a directive.
Other country's security has to implement or meet standards set, otherwise no flights can come to the US from there. We don't set their rules, they do. We just tell them whether or not we think they're good enough. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
|
|
![]() when you step into the boarding area of a major airport you are on US soil via agreement with canada. Not TSA but border patrol and customs.
http://en.wikipedia....rder_preclearance |
|
![]() I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
|
|
![]() Although you use similar language, you're coming to a different conclusion than me.
E.g. http://www.tsa.gov/a...dancev1.12.07.pdf SUBJECT: ENFORCEMENT SANCTION GUIDANCE POLICY AFAICS, it's similar to an FAA "airworthiness directive" - http://www.airweb.fa...rame?OpenFrameSet . If the FAA says to do something and the operator doesn't, the plane can't fly. And TSA has broad powers over foreign carriers that operate in the US. http://ecfr.gpoacces...9#49:9.1.3.5.13.1 (I assume that's a transient link...) Subpart BÂSecurity Program As to whether TSA does the actual screening at foreign airports or not, I can't say. (See, e.g., http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-729 ) However, it's fairly clear to me that if TSA is not satisfied with foreign carrier screening, their planes can be denied landing rights. IOW, TSA does write the rules that foreign carriers have to meet. They don't simply make recommendations. (Again, it may be semantics, but I think it's important.) Cheers, Scott. |
|
![]() TSA and FAA set standards that need to be met in order for a plane to overfly and/or land here.
They don't screen. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
|
|
![]() I was screened. And some of the people doing the screening were /definitely/ Americans. That said, it was no big deal, but... that was ten or so years ago, ya know?
|