IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Not to mean to join threads but after the boom
Post #31,395
by screamer
Picture of screamer
3/8/02 4:30:29 PM
Reply
New Not to mean to join threads but after the boom
will Ciceronicus Twelve sue the (former) residents of the (former) Earth (assuming Einstein's notion of time travel) in the past for the second hand smoke from our solar system? Or, can we take the momentum from the successes in second hand smoke legislation and transfer it into a coherent platform for an Anti-ICBM/Starwars summit?

"Premier, we must ban nuclear (pronounced new kew lar) weapons 'cause we fear they would produce massive amounts of second hand smoke!"

Klaatu...
Just a few thoughts,

Screamer

"It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine"

M. Stipe

"Nietzsche has an S in it"
Celina Jones
Post #31,417
by Ashton
3/8/02 6:29:22 PM
Reply
New ..barada Nikkto
I am glad that you asked this question. In a recent class on fumigating noxious planets inhabited by carbon-units of surpassing low survival qualities + large 'mouth'-holes in {ugh} whitish-looking 'faces' -

A second year student from Cygnus opined that.. perhaps we should not be too hard on the Terran system since - it was our very own explorer ship whose ejected urine bags, led to the spawning of this particularly banal life-form (then the class snickered when s/he whispered, Do you know how they *have sex* there ??)

After the guffawing (and uncontrollable snorting from the very long-necked Rigelian) subsided - it was decided that this question should be taken up at the next ethics colloquium; after all, we allowed the smallpox bacterium to survive in its small crystal microbarium.

Still.. should this 'second-hand smoke' show signs of migration from the Terran Quarantined Sector, well.. Gort has his instructions. In keeping with their highest ethical valuez: we'll just 'buy' them and then we may treat them as they treat their other 'abandoned pets': Banal Life Systems Terminated.



Hope this puts your mind at unease,


Ashton Channeled Universal Wisdom AG.
     Oh my gawd! I'm shocked... - (screamer) - (37) - March 6, 2002, 01:30:28 PM EST
         Uh... How, exactly, do you reckon you're "vindicated" here?? - (CRConrad) - (29) - March 6, 2002, 05:59:03 PM EST
             In our last, um, er, "discussion"... - (screamer) - (28) - March 6, 2002, 10:25:57 PM EST
                 Read the article again - (wharris2) - (8) - March 7, 2002, 05:07:13 AM EST
                     On plain bullshit... - (screamer) - (7) - March 8, 2002, 11:13:32 AM EST
                         The BS is yours; you're missing a fundamental point. - (CRConrad) - (6) - March 11, 2002, 12:27:01 PM EST
                             Dunno how it works in Finland - (boxley) - (2) - March 11, 2002, 12:33:15 PM EST
                                 Works exactly the same here. Unfortunately... - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 12:45:38 PM EST
                                     Don't we wish - (drewk) - March 11, 2002, 12:54:00 PM EST
                             The one on your head? - (screamer) - (2) - March 11, 2002, 01:40:45 PM EST
                                 No, the one that swished past above yours. - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 02:17:26 PM EST
                                     was the swish in yer title intentional? - (boxley) - March 11, 2002, 03:09:48 PM EST
                 "We must ban combustion engines before smoking"? Only if... - (CRConrad) - (18) - March 7, 2002, 06:25:53 PM EST
                     Ever live in a city? - (screamer) - (17) - March 8, 2002, 11:19:44 AM EST
                         Don't think you need to look for figures; they're so obvious - (CRConrad) - (16) - March 11, 2002, 12:40:12 PM EST
                             Need a unit conversion - (drewk) - (15) - March 11, 2002, 12:52:32 PM EST
                                 Nope; hours / minutes / seconds is the same here as there. - (CRConrad) - (14) - March 11, 2002, 01:17:21 PM EST
                                     Yo... Sir majesty... - (screamer) - (13) - March 11, 2002, 01:27:34 PM EST
                                         Kneel when thou talkest to me, peasant! - (CRConrad) - (12) - March 11, 2002, 01:37:34 PM EST
                                             Dang, it's like IRC or something... You've been - (screamer) - (11) - March 11, 2002, 01:44:53 PM EST
                                                 Gimme socially responsible, tasty, juicy chewing terbacky... - (CRConrad) - (10) - March 11, 2002, 01:51:15 PM EST
                                                     I'm adding to my list... - (screamer) - (9) - March 11, 2002, 02:06:28 PM EST
                                                         Now you're so bogus it's just boring. - (CRConrad) - (8) - March 11, 2002, 02:26:37 PM EST
                                                             Hope you're not too bored... - (screamer) - (7) - March 11, 2002, 04:34:03 PM EST
                                                                 Hypocrisy comes in 'scales' and has 'relativity' too.. - (Ashton) - (2) - March 11, 2002, 05:26:50 PM EST
                                                                     Re: Hypocrisy comes in 'scales' and has 'relativity' too.. - (wharris2) - (1) - March 11, 2002, 08:16:58 PM EST
                                                                         No argument there.. - (Ashton) - March 11, 2002, 09:16:00 PM EST
                                                                 OK, so you think it's better if I get *annoyed*, in stead? - (CRConrad) - (3) - March 12, 2002, 05:21:18 AM EST
                                                                     Does it even matter if it is carcenogenic? - (wharris2) - (2) - March 12, 2002, 12:15:44 PM EST
                                                                         Foolish attempt at some sort of summary (?) - (Ashton) - (1) - March 12, 2002, 03:29:31 PM EST
                                                                             Nah, just right-shifting the monomania a bit :=) -NT - (wharris2) - March 12, 2002, 03:31:42 PM EST
         Nah, this only means... - (bepatient) - (1) - March 6, 2002, 08:32:22 PM EST
             About the lack of warning signs on the GW... - (screamer) - March 8, 2002, 04:10:48 PM EST
         Not to worry, Dan - (Ashton) - (2) - March 8, 2002, 03:25:35 PM EST
             Not to mean to join threads but after the boom - (screamer) - (1) - March 8, 2002, 04:30:29 PM EST
                 ..barada Nikkto - (Ashton) - March 8, 2002, 06:29:22 PM EST
         get that chicken leg outta my face! - (boxley) - (1) - March 12, 2002, 04:56:56 PM EST
             Chortle.. - (Ashton) - March 12, 2002, 05:08:42 PM EST

Are you game enough to ICLPRD that subject line?
425 ms