Apple changed how the drive size is reported
http://macdailynews....g/comments/22247/
Guess I was up too late for math last night :-) My free space before was 59.08, after was 72.44. What I did last night was (after-before) * conversion, when what I should have done was (after * conversion) - before. Conversion = 3.7 / 4 (72.44 * 3.7 / 4) - 59.08 = 7.93 That's more in line with what everybody else is reporting. Still, a nice chunk of extra space. |
OS X 10.6: fast, good, cheap.
- (pwhysall)
- (12)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 11:00:13 AM EDT
Re: OS X 10.6: fast, good, cheap.
- (Bman)
- (3)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 11:41:33 AM EDT
Re: OS X 10.6: fast, good, cheap.
- (pwhysall)
- (2)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 12:04:36 PM EDT
Re: OS X 10.6: fast, good, cheap.
- (Bman)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 12:25:39 PM EDT
There's a list at TheReg.
- (Another Scott)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 01:11:55 PM EDT
Plan to pick it up tonight
-NT
- (SpiceWare)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 02:14:15 PM EDT
Noticeably faster!
- (SpiceWare)
- (1)
- Aug. 28, 2009, 10:43:18 PM EDT
Apple changed how the drive size is reported
- (SpiceWare)
- Aug. 29, 2009, 12:48:29 PM EDT
got it to day
- (Bman)
- Aug. 31, 2009, 06:07:09 PM EDT
Siracusa on SL
- (rcareaga)
- (2)
- Sept. 1, 2009, 05:23:24 PM EDT
Zooks! 23 pages! That's Proustian for the Web! :-)
- (Another Scott)
- Sept. 1, 2009, 05:32:34 PM EDT
awesome, finally a clear explaination
- (boxley)
- Sept. 1, 2009, 06:02:19 PM EDT
My upgrade this evening
- (rcareaga)
- Sept. 1, 2009, 09:00:44 PM EDT
