IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New bingo on the last sentence
I have worked with quite a bit of medical software. Its nice that the feds are spending money on an eds for medicine. Sit down with ins co's docs and feds to determine fields, queries, reports and exchange medium. Makes billing, patient recall an awesome task. However when the aim of the project is to rein in medical choices as the suit alleges, then its gone beyond eds and into a medical decision tree controlled by government bureaucrats and not the dr giving the treatment
New We'll see. No doubt that there should be strong oversight.
     nice health bill - (boxley) - (34)
         We need the stimulus...doncha know. -NT - (beepster) - (33)
             No, that was so last week. - (hnick) - (32)
                 well ATL is already full of zombies and vampires - (boxley)
                 What... - (beepster) - (30)
                     Glimmel... - (hnick)
                     "War...builds things that have a real value" - (mhuber) - (28)
                         can we start with mine? - (boxley) - (21)
                             Yes, but a huge amount of money . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                             What were you making? - (mhuber) - (19)
                                 Trickle down? - (beepster) - (18)
                                     Yup, not so hard to figure out. - (Another Scott) - (17)
                                         Re: Yup, not so hard to figure out. - (boxley)
                                         Nothing stated in there creates a job - (beepster) - (15)
                                             Categorical statements are (almost) always wrong. - (Another Scott) - (14)
                                                 Wow. - (beepster) - (13)
                                                     Hardly. - (Another Scott) - (12)
                                                         What I see - (beepster) - (11)
                                                             Who is "them"? - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                                                 Ok, fine - (beepster) - (2)
                                                                     Beep! - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                         Sometimes it seems like it - (beepster)
                                                                 yeah, invest in medical records, sure you betcha - (boxley) - (6)
                                                                     Anyone can file a lawsuit. Film at 11:00. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                                                         2,3,4 and 10 are where the argument lies -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                                                                             How can having better records give poorer results? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                                 bingo on the last sentence - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                     We'll see. No doubt that there should be strong oversight. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                             Did you miss the Obama quip (borrowed from Newt) on records? - (a6l6e6x)
                         Think, man - (beepster) - (5)
                             I agree 100% - (jake123)
                             Forget high-speed, how about *commuter* rail - (drook) - (3)
                                 because they expect it to be profitable - (beepster) - (2)
                                     True, unlike roads - (drook) - (1)
                                         Governments don't understand public transport. - (static)

Oh, for the love of cheese.
59 ms