Re: Application->ProcessMessages()

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #310,237 by folkert 6/28/09 9:46:11 AM Reply	Re: Application->ProcessMessages() it looks like a matter of slowing it down a touch.
Post #310,238 by Another Scott 6/28/09 9:56:16 AM Reply	Sorta. It's a matter of letting go of the GUI message queue (or whatever the proper term is) so that the interface messages continue to flow in the OS properly. It's much less granular to do it this way than to add "sleep" messages which do nothing more than slow it down. As I understand it, anyway. :-) Cheers, Scott.

Debian on VirtualBox. Easy-peasy. - (Another Scott) - (14) - June 11, 2009, 12:46:49 AM EDT

Re: Debian on VirtualBox. Easy-peasy. - (folkert) - (13) - June 11, 2009, 09:21:30 AM EDT

Thanks. - (Another Scott) - (12) - June 11, 2009, 11:07:25 PM EDT

Re: Thanks. - (folkert) - (1) - June 12, 2009, 12:26:35 AM EDT

It's a binary made with Borland C++ Builder 5. - (Another Scott) - June 12, 2009, 12:42:03 AM EDT

No RAM errors after 9 cycles. - (Another Scott) - (9) - June 12, 2009, 08:43:32 AM EDT

Re: No RAM errors after 9 cycles. - (folkert) - (8) - June 12, 2009, 11:10:09 AM EDT

Thanks again. - (Another Scott) - (7) - June 12, 2009, 06:52:15 PM EDT

Seems to be a video and/or motherboard issue. - (Another Scott) - (6) - June 13, 2009, 12:26:36 AM EDT

Maybe not... - (Another Scott) - (5) - June 13, 2009, 12:53:35 AM EDT

Hmmm... - (folkert) - (1) - June 13, 2009, 10:55:36 AM EDT

"It always worked before, therefore it's not my fault." - (Another Scott) - June 13, 2009, 11:26:20 AM EDT

Application->ProcessMessages() - (Another Scott) - (2) - June 27, 2009, 10:46:30 PM EDT

Re: Application->ProcessMessages() - (folkert) - (1) - June 28, 2009, 09:46:11 AM EDT

Sorta. - (Another Scott) - June 28, 2009, 09:56:16 AM EDT

Clearly designed to be used by faery maidens with a feather touch, rather than a six foot three engineer in a pair of size 13 steelies.
48 ms