Hmmm...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #309,639 by folkert 6/13/09 10:55:36 AM Reply	Hmmm... Sounds familiar... Programmers blaming hardware... hardware guys blaming the software devs for sloppy work... Same conundrum as has been forever.
Post #309,642 by Another Scott 6/13/09 11:26:20 AM Reply	"It always worked before, therefore it's not my fault." "Nothing bad has happened yet, therefore I'm Ok." http://xkcd.com/582/ :-) Cheers, Scott. (Who thinks that some programmers may have a lot of work upcoming - fixing old code to run on superfast CPUs.)

Debian on VirtualBox. Easy-peasy. - (Another Scott) - (14) - June 11, 2009, 12:46:49 AM EDT

Re: Debian on VirtualBox. Easy-peasy. - (folkert) - (13) - June 11, 2009, 09:21:30 AM EDT

Thanks. - (Another Scott) - (12) - June 11, 2009, 11:07:25 PM EDT

Re: Thanks. - (folkert) - (1) - June 12, 2009, 12:26:35 AM EDT

It's a binary made with Borland C++ Builder 5. - (Another Scott) - June 12, 2009, 12:42:03 AM EDT

No RAM errors after 9 cycles. - (Another Scott) - (9) - June 12, 2009, 08:43:32 AM EDT

Re: No RAM errors after 9 cycles. - (folkert) - (8) - June 12, 2009, 11:10:09 AM EDT

Thanks again. - (Another Scott) - (7) - June 12, 2009, 06:52:15 PM EDT

Seems to be a video and/or motherboard issue. - (Another Scott) - (6) - June 13, 2009, 12:26:36 AM EDT

Maybe not... - (Another Scott) - (5) - June 13, 2009, 12:53:35 AM EDT

Hmmm... - (folkert) - (1) - June 13, 2009, 10:55:36 AM EDT

"It always worked before, therefore it's not my fault." - (Another Scott) - June 13, 2009, 11:26:20 AM EDT

Application->ProcessMessages() - (Another Scott) - (2) - June 27, 2009, 10:46:30 PM EDT

Re: Application->ProcessMessages() - (folkert) - (1) - June 28, 2009, 09:46:11 AM EDT

Sorta. - (Another Scott) - June 28, 2009, 09:56:16 AM EDT

Just a SMOP.
132 ms