IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New The TV reporting is hype.
What a surprise, eh?

Consider the company's PDF: http://www.rasertech.com/download/14/

Excerpts:
4WD Performance Criteria
Electric H3
Simulation Results
Acceleration: 0 – 60 mph (seconds) : 8.8
Electric Range: 40 miles
Combined Range: 400 (11 gal tank)
Fuel Economy: 100 mpg at a distance of 65 Miles


Things to note:
1) It's a simulated result. It's not yet a real mileage number.
2) 400 miles / 11 gallons = 36 mpg. This thing only gets "100 mpg" if it uses a fraction of its range.
3) Any car can get high mpg for short distances if driven *very* carefully. They'll only get 40 electric miles out of this thing if it's driven *very* carefully.

http://www.caranddri...oadster_road_test

More:
V-8 Engine Versus 2.0 Liter Engine

Most SUVs and trucks of this size require a large V-8 combustion engine. In Raser’s plug-in series hybrid architecture, the combustion engine is only used occasionally to recharge the batteries. A much smaller, more efficient 1 to 2 liter combustion engine can replace the stock 5-6-liter engines. The combustion engine is connected only to the electric generator and is not connected to the drive system. The engine is used only generate electricity and recharge the batteries when the vehicle drives beyond its 40 mile battery range.

And when driving beyond battery range, a vehicle using Raser’s electric drive system should get twice the highway gas fuel economy over the base vehicle. This is primarily achieved by operating the engine only at its peak efficiency of about 30% to recharge batteries, rather than at the average of 15% efficiency when accelerating the vehicle.


Also note that the total range numbers in the PDF are alternatively 360, 380 or 400 miles. It's not a good sign when they can't keep their story straight in 2 pages.

The Prius has a 59 kW (80 HP) electric motor. The Raser claims to use a 200 kW (272 HP) electric motor. (The $111k Tesla Roadster motor is 248 HP and takes 8-10 hours to charge at 240V, 37 hours at 120V, according to the C/D link.) Yet it will be charged by a 1-2 liter gas engine driving a generator and give 320-360 miles of range? And only cost $12k-$15k more than a Hummer H2?

Yeah, right.

It may be an interesting engineering exercise, but it looks like there are too many loose ends to have faith in this ever being a real product.

Cheers,
Scott.
New The Real Question Is...
...will they be able to make the Hummer actually be something you'd want to drive? I've thrashed an H2 round a track and it's quite the most godawful car to drive, even before I starting caning it. Wallowy, slow, and noisy.

And the cabin was crap. And the seat was rubbish.

Electric cars, in their battery-powered guise, are a curate's egg. I believe that hydrogen and fuel cells are the future. It's just a small matter of infrastructure.

In the meantime, the likes of BMW and VW are producing family diesels that do in excess of 50MPG on the combined cycle, and which are a lot cheaper than their hybrid equivalents.
New The Hummer is simply an intimidation vehicle...
Designed to look like they can simply crush and roll over any passenger vehicle. They broadcast "Get out of the way, peasants!"

They are suitable for men with a fat ass and a small penis.
Alex
New AND surprisingly SMALL women...
I've seen a recent surge in small, petite women (5' 4" or shorter and 100lbs or less) owning and driving these HUGE things.

Or a Suburban, or an Excursion, or an Escalade or an {insert very big vehicle}

Its not just fat insecure men with a small johnson.
New Well, there's is even smaller . . .
. . and kind of bent over at the end.
New Most of the people I see driving them around here...
... are 60+yo sour-looking women wearing furs. I kid you not.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Re: Most of the people I see driving them around here...
You'd be sour-looking, too, if you were stuck behind the wheel of one of those shitheaps.
New I'm guessing it's just furthering the sour...
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
     not going to get rid of humers that easily - (boxley) - (20)
         TANSTAAFL - (Ashton) - (11)
             There are lunches less costly, however - (rcareaga) - (2)
                 Re: There are lunches less costly, however - (Andrew Grygus)
                 Was addressing the implicit absurdity in this puff-piece -- - (Ashton)
             Oil Imports (possible nit) - (dmcarls) - (7)
                 shh, dont annoy the true beleivers :-) -NT - (boxley)
                 Give it time... - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     this guy is not a blogger, sycophant, thinktank maven - (boxley) - (4)
                         Re: this guy is not a blogger, sycophant, thinktank maven - (Ashton) - (1)
                             oh I forgot, retiree :-) -NT - (boxley)
                         Those pics are all from the showroom, not the jobsite - (jake123) - (1)
                             jobsite guarrantee -NT - (boxley)
         The TV reporting is hype. - (Another Scott) - (7)
             The Real Question Is... - (pwhysall) - (6)
                 The Hummer is simply an intimidation vehicle... - (a6l6e6x) - (5)
                     AND surprisingly SMALL women... - (folkert) - (4)
                         Well, there's is even smaller . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                         Most of the people I see driving them around here... - (malraux) - (2)
                             Re: Most of the people I see driving them around here... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                 I'm guessing it's just furthering the sour... -NT - (malraux)

Ashes to Ashton, dust to debris.
100 ms