I'm sorry, Rush. - (Silverlock) - (34) - March 4, 2009, 08:07:46 AM EST
         remember McCarthy? - (boxley) - (33) - March 4, 2009, 08:49:52 AM EST
             This is all a game - (beepster) - (32) - March 4, 2009, 09:58:45 AM EST
                 Ya know - (jake123) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 10:07:06 AM EST
                     face it Jake if it wasnt for hnic no one would voluntarily - (boxley) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:18:51 AM EST
                         I'd have to disagree with that - (jake123) - March 5, 2009, 10:17:28 AM EST
                     So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 10:46:01 AM EST
                         Some places they de-facto do - (mhuber) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 01:05:41 PM EST
                             Just cut it out - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 01:41:32 PM EST
                 No - (drook) - (19) - March 4, 2009, 10:47:25 AM EST
                     So don't vote for them. - (beepster) - (18) - March 4, 2009, 11:05:28 AM EST
                         He has the power given to him by the Republicans. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (17) - March 4, 2009, 11:42:12 AM EST
                             They're not doing it. - (beepster) - (16) - March 4, 2009, 01:45:52 PM EST
                                 There weren't too many Democrats at CPAC. - (Another Scott) - (15) - March 4, 2009, 02:22:12 PM EST
                                     No I'm not (and d'uh ^^) - (beepster) - (7) - March 4, 2009, 03:20:45 PM EST
                                         Yes you are - (drook) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:30:44 PM EST
                                             BS. Pure and simple - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:36:33 PM EST
                                                 I'm not talking about the campaign - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:12 PM EST
                                                     Why is that such a big deal? - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 05:24:08 PM EST
                                                         You seem to be missing the point. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 07:38:48 PM EST
                                                             I'm missing that poiint? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 10:13:30 PM EST
                                                     And lets look at that apology being spun - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:58:43 PM EST
                                     ..nor Father Coughlan; in the '30's: Our Rwanda propagandist - (Ashton) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:29:13 PM EST
                                         Aren't I the one oft accused of falling for the ploy du jour - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:32:06 PM EST
                                             No one thinks you're dumb enough to fall for it - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:34:34 PM EST
                                                 Me repeating it? - (beepster) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 03:38:48 PM EST
                                                     Was referring to the "frequently accused" line - (drook) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:01 PM EST
                                                         (Surely you've known for years.. - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 03:56:10 PM EST
                                                         What Republican ploy would that be? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:26:34 PM EST
                 And by the way ... - (drook) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:48:20 PM EST
                     They have an option. - (beepster) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 05:31:08 PM EST
                         If that were true . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 09:19:02 PM EST
                             Amenuensis. -NT - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 09:48:46 PM EST
                             And again... - (beepster) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:11:40 PM EST
                                 For that argument to be valid . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 5, 2009, 12:06:28 AM EST