So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #305,052 by beepster 3/4/09 10:46:01 AM Reply	So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations and puts Rush in drive time...we can talk about this being a comparison. Of course the ONLY radio station in the country is going to have good ratings. D'uh. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #305,065 by mhuber 3/4/09 1:05:41 PM Reply	Some places they de-facto do Armed Forces Radio, in some parts of the world, is pretty much the only English language station around. Don't know if Rush is still on it all the time, though. He was for a while.
Post #305,072 by beepster 3/4/09 1:41:32 PM Reply	Just cut it out it was a silly comparison...no matter how you try and spin it. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.

I'm sorry, Rush. - (Silverlock) - (34) - March 4, 2009, 08:07:46 AM EST

remember McCarthy? - (boxley) - (33) - March 4, 2009, 08:49:52 AM EST

This is all a game - (beepster) - (32) - March 4, 2009, 09:58:45 AM EST

Ya know - (jake123) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 10:07:06 AM EST

face it Jake if it wasnt for hnic no one would voluntarily - (boxley) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:18:51 AM EST

I'd have to disagree with that - (jake123) - March 5, 2009, 10:17:28 AM EST

So when the US Gov't takes over all radio stations - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 10:46:01 AM EST

Some places they de-facto do - (mhuber) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 01:05:41 PM EST

Just cut it out - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 01:41:32 PM EST

No - (drook) - (19) - March 4, 2009, 10:47:25 AM EST

So don't vote for them. - (beepster) - (18) - March 4, 2009, 11:05:28 AM EST

He has the power given to him by the Republicans. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (17) - March 4, 2009, 11:42:12 AM EST

They're not doing it. - (beepster) - (16) - March 4, 2009, 01:45:52 PM EST

There weren't too many Democrats at CPAC. - (Another Scott) - (15) - March 4, 2009, 02:22:12 PM EST

No I'm not (and d'uh ^^) - (beepster) - (7) - March 4, 2009, 03:20:45 PM EST

Yes you are - (drook) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:30:44 PM EST

BS. Pure and simple - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:36:33 PM EST

I'm not talking about the campaign - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:12 PM EST

Why is that such a big deal? - (beepster) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 05:24:08 PM EST

You seem to be missing the point. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 07:38:48 PM EST

I'm missing that poiint? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 10:13:30 PM EST

And lets look at that apology being spun - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:58:43 PM EST

..nor Father Coughlan; in the '30's: Our Rwanda propagandist - (Ashton) - (6) - March 4, 2009, 03:29:13 PM EST

Aren't I the one oft accused of falling for the ploy du jour - (beepster) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:32:06 PM EST

No one thinks you're dumb enough to fall for it - (drook) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 03:34:34 PM EST

Me repeating it? - (beepster) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 03:38:48 PM EST

Was referring to the "frequently accused" line - (drook) - (2) - March 4, 2009, 03:45:01 PM EST

(Surely you've known for years.. - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 03:56:10 PM EST

What Republican ploy would that be? - (beepster) - March 4, 2009, 05:26:34 PM EST

And by the way ... - (drook) - (5) - March 4, 2009, 03:48:20 PM EST

They have an option. - (beepster) - (4) - March 4, 2009, 05:31:08 PM EST

If that were true . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 4, 2009, 09:19:02 PM EST

Amenuensis. -NT - (Ashton) - March 4, 2009, 09:48:46 PM EST

And again... - (beepster) - (1) - March 4, 2009, 10:11:40 PM EST

For that argument to be valid . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - March 5, 2009, 12:06:28 AM EST

Yay! You got a... thing.
139 ms