Their categories are:
  • Comments unrelated to the RPFJ and the Microsoft case in general

  • Comments unrelated to the RPFJ but related to the Microsoft case

  • Comments that express a view of the RPFJ but offer no analysis

  • Comments that express a view of the RPFJ and offer some analysis

  • Comments that express a view of the RPFJ and offer substantial analysis

That seems to be an inclusive list of all possible comments, but [link|http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms_tuncom/public/17/mtc-00016261.htm|mine] isn't in any of them. Granted I didn't send in the most detailed comment, but it ought to be in one of those categories.