he clearly at that time felt that the negative rights in the current constitution did not contain positive rights and that he legislatively wants to change that.
I beleive he means what he says, as you all claim :-)
scary obama tape
- (boxley)
- (17)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 08:21:34 AM EDT
Hmm
- (jay)
- (13)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 09:08:12 AM EDT
I'm with you on that one
- (jake123)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 09:13:43 AM EDT
the wealth part isnt the scary part
- (boxley)
- (11)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 10:38:40 AM EDT
Well its obvious
- (beepster)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 02:01:22 PM EDT
Isn't what he said.
- (jay)
- (9)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 02:39:37 PM EDT
text of what he did say
- (boxley)
- (8)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 02:52:24 PM EDT
That's out of context, too.
- (Another Scott)
- (7)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 08:55:02 PM EDT
JFC cant you read plain english?
- (boxley)
- (6)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 11:01:14 PM EDT
I don't think it says what you think it says.
- (malraux)
- (3)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 11:18:12 PM EDT
lets ask a law professor from Northwestern University
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Oct. 28, 2008, 09:25:30 AM EDT
lets ask a law professor from the University of Chicago
- (malraux)
- Oct. 28, 2008, 09:56:30 AM EDT
He forgot to mention
- (mhuber)
- Oct. 28, 2008, 09:54:46 AM EDT
Yes. Consider the entire paragraph, please. :-)
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 11:35:34 PM EDT
One more thing.
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 28, 2008, 12:06:50 AM EDT
Comments taken out of context can be scary.
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 07:51:11 PM EDT
the text was not out of context
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Oct. 27, 2008, 08:32:40 PM EDT
No, only Bush (now McCain) can be indicted this way
-NT
- (beepster)
- Oct. 28, 2008, 08:48:03 AM EDT