But also, as usual, you provide few (in this case - no) specifics to try to prove your case. It's a poor effort for you, IMHO.
If you want to engage in conversation on these issues, you might talk more about one of the several topics you discuss. For instance, it appears that the vote on the [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force|AUMF] vote was 420:1 in the House, and 98:0 in the Senate. It's hard to square that with your claim the "... Democrats ... chose to oppose." Perhaps you can enlighten me on how you see it differently.
Not that I expect you to do so - it's been years since you engaged in actual debate here (rather than apparently trying to drive traffic to your various blogs)....
Cheers,
Scott.