IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New There's lots of interesting science being done on smoking...
[link|http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/dn11974-tobaccos-natural-radiation-dose-higher-than-after-chernobyl.html|New Scientist]:

Tobacco's natural radiation dose higher than after Chernobyl

12:00 02 June 2007
NewScientist.com news service

If nothing else, this should worry smokers: the radiation dose from radium and polonium found naturally in tobacco can be a thousand times more than that from the caesium-137 taken up by the leaves from the Chernobyl nuclear accident.

Constantin Papastefanou from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in Greece measured radioactivity in tobacco leaves from across the country and calculated the average radiation dose that would be received by people smoking 30 cigarettes a day. He found that the dose from natural radionuclides was 251 microsieverts a year, compared with 0.199 from Chernobyl fallout in the leaves (Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol 123, p 68).

Though the radiation dose from smoking was only 10 per cent of the average dose anyone receives from all natural sources, Papastefanou argues that it is an increased risk. "Many scientists believe that cancer deaths among smokers are due to the radioactive content of tobacco leaves and not to nicotine and tar," he says.


One might want to avoid European cigarettes...

FWIW.

[link|http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/Factsheets/cig_smoking_mort.htm|Smoking-related mortality from the CDC] has some more numbers.

Cheers,
Scott.
New naw, low dose radiation therapy cures cancer :-)
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
New The CDC link is much more informative than mine!
Alex

Nobody has a more sacred obligation to obey the law than those who make the law. -- Sophocles (496? - 406 BCE)
     OK you smokers, here's the latest. - (a6l6e6x) - (10)
         I wonder how they gathered those stats - (boxley) - (9)
             There's lots of interesting science being done on smoking... - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 naw, low dose radiation therapy cures cancer :-) -NT - (boxley)
                 The CDC link is much more informative than mine! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
             It does if the smoke gets dropped in your lap - (crazy)
             According the National Cancer Institute the 440K figure - (Seamus) - (4)
                 certainly smoking is an exerbating feature - (boxley) - (3)
                     So, you are looking for the diagnostic criteria - (Seamus) - (2)
                         depends on who is funding them - (boxley) - (1)
                             Your opinion was pretty obvious what I was looking for - (Seamus)

Cosmological belly bomber.
82 ms