IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Deal is
only one is actually mentioned by party. Yet they are all the same party.

No, its not sexual misconduct...but if these crooks don't deserve a mention by party, how can the media be trusted to report in kind?
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New On trusting the media reporting...
[link|http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/12/world/middleeast/12cong.html?_r=2&oref=login&oref=slogin|NY Times]:

Senate Narrowly Backs Bush in Rejecting Debate on Increasing Time Between Deployments


As the [link|http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/015349.php|TPM] notes, the Senate voted 56 to 41. Against Bush. I guess it's that Liberal MediaTM up to its old tricks again, eh?

IOW, one can find lots of isolated examples of headlines or summaries of stories that seem to be slanted when other explanations are more likely.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Nah, I think you missed the real issue why people care
It's the "family values" stuff the Republicans are always
screaming about. That is why that particular behaviour
strikes a nerve. Each party has its hot button list
of political planks, and when they do something that
is opposed to the plank, they become fair game.

When Clinton got in trouble for Monica (and others),
you'll note that his supporters mostly said, "So?"
It's not like this behaviour was unknown, or unexepected.
He certainly didn't claim that his party was against this
behaviour, and that other people shouldn't do it, and
THEN did it anyway.

I think they key issue is we love to destroy hypocrites.

Especially ones that are in a position of creating laws that
affect how we can behave. We especially love to go after
them, since they are in a position to inflict their
bullshit on the rest of us. And the people who create
laws that impact interpersonal behaviour with a religious
foundation are almost always right wing republicans.

So, as far as your example with Bryant and other, yes,
politicians in general are scum, and yes, a certain subset
of them will be stealing from the public.

BUT: We expect that. No matter which party.

It is when some anti-business tree hugging democrat who
tries to champion a bunch of causes is found to own a
substantial amount of stock in Exxon-Mobil is what becomes
a problem. Not for offering blowjobs in the bathroom.
Because he was already expected to be doing that.
     The Republicans should just disband the Party and go home. - (Another Scott) - (22)
         Can you tell me whats missing in this? - (bepatient) - (16)
             I don't see any mention of prostitution there... -NT - (Another Scott) - (15)
                 true, just crooked politicos - (bepatient) - (14)
                     I'm not going to play that game. - (Another Scott) - (13)
                         Deal is - (bepatient) - (2)
                             On trusting the media reporting... - (Another Scott)
                             Nah, I think you missed the real issue why people care - (crazy)
                         LOL - (Simon_Jester) - (9)
                             Not quite, but close - (bepatient) - (7)
                                 The fact that he was DHS is/was relevant. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                     And so reporting... - (bepatient) - (3)
                                         Duh... - (folkert)
                                         Careful. With all that straw, you'll start a fire. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                             Just keeping myself warm -NT - (bepatient)
                                 You really should've followed my link. -NT - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                                     Seen that before. - (bepatient)
                             the cop was the prostitute, he was the customer -NT - (boxley)
         we are talking bj's here move along nothing to see -NT - (boxley) - (4)
             Thats true, they don't count. -NT - (bepatient) - (3)
                 wait thats not true... - (boxley) - (2)
                     Maybe it was research? :-) -NT - (bepatient) - (1)
                         maybe, sounds like he has searched it before -NT - (boxley)

Now, with 10% more RAM!
41 ms