reagan was fine, bush 41 was dreck, but nixon dreck

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #281,502

by boxley

4/12/07 8:34:21 AM

reagan was fine, bush 41 was dreck, but nixon dreck

Clinton started okay but it went to his head and rolled down hill. Bush 43 was contained until 911 then fucked out at everyone. Kosovo is as fucked as Iraq and a lot closer to you if the russians jump in.
thanx,
bill

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]

Post #281,672

by Ashton

4/13/07 4:56:08 AM

Re: 'reagan was fine, ' ... OK, now we know about you -

but what about Reagan. aka

I don't like Bach!
Well, now we .. etc.

Fed panel alters findings to fit Repo talking points. - (Silverlock) - (7) - April 11, 2007, 09:23:52 AM EDT

I am sure Rove hadn't seen the final report yet - (Seamus) - (6) - April 11, 2007, 10:06:25 AM EDT

"Some parts of the country"? "Beginning"? - (CRConrad) - (5) - April 11, 2007, 04:53:18 PM EDT

since 1992 doncha mean. Both houses be poxed -NT - (boxley) - (3) - April 11, 2007, 10:03:11 PM EDT

"Fair and balanced", BOx/Fox-style. - (CRConrad) - (2) - April 12, 2007, 03:42:47 AM EDT

reagan was fine, bush 41 was dreck, but nixon dreck - (boxley) - (1) - April 12, 2007, 08:34:21 AM EDT

Re: 'reagan was fine, ' ... OK, now we know about you - - (Ashton) - April 13, 2007, 04:56:08 AM EDT

That's the side of this he doesn't want to talk about - (Seamus) - April 12, 2007, 04:02:48 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Seriously, for someone who shows some signs of intelligence, the consistency with which you misunderstand anything inconvenient to you is quite amazing.
35 ms