IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I am sure you don't
I didn't comment on whether the administration acted as it should have, I believe the only asked for input on policy from those who agree with them. A polar opposite of a president such as Lincoln. I think a presidential administration has the duty to seek out as much input as possible when it come a important national priority such as energy. They did not.

I also didn't comment on the intelligence of the american public. When it comes to politics, it seems to be disinterested in looking at the why behind the actions of politicians. Why they are disinterested I didn't offer an opinion. My comment was about how it seems to me that this administration only says what they think their base wants to hear.

I believe we the people deserve a government where what that government does and how it decides what it does needs to be done is open to inspection and debate.

A don't believe in witch hunts. Please leave your issues out of my comments.
Seamus
Collapse Edited by Seamus March 25, 2007, 02:12:06 PM EDT
I am sure you don't
I didn't comment on whether the administration acted as it should have, I believe the only asked for input on policy from those who agree with them. A polar opposite of a president such as Lincoln. I think a presidential administrationhas the duty to seek out as much input as possible when it come a important national prioirty such as energy. They did not.

I also didn't comment on the intelligence of the american public. When it comes to politics, it seems to be disinterested in looking at the why behind the actions of politicians. Why they are disinterested I didn't offer an opinion. My comment was about how it seems to me that this administration only says what they think their base wants to hear.

I believe we the people deserve a government where what that government does and how it decides what it does needs to be done is open to inspection and debate.

A don't believe in witch hunts. Please leave your issues out of my comments.

Seamus
     Presidential Records Act. Any enforcement teeth? - (Silverlock) - (45)
         a link to yahoo mail? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             Fixed. - (Silverlock)
         thanks for fixing the link, questions - (boxley) - (42)
             My two cents - (jbrabeck) - (41)
                 disagree and heres why - (boxley) - (40)
                     But... - (jbrabeck) - (25)
                         no, the sources shouldnt have to be public - (boxley) - (23)
                             So Cheney's forming his "energy policy"... - (jb4) - (22)
                                 Yes. - (bepatient) - (19)
                                     I'd like that to be true - (drewk) - (18)
                                         So? - (bepatient) - (17)
                                             No you don't - (drewk) - (16)
                                                 I thought we were talking about policy? - (bepatient) - (15)
                                                     The spin always comes out first, though - (drewk) - (14)
                                                         And this necessitates making advice public how, exactly? - (bepatient) - (13)
                                                             The selling, and the reaction to it, *is* how it's developed -NT - (drewk) - (12)
                                                                 I thought it was developed by secret meetings - (bepatient) - (11)
                                                                     Since we're clearly talking past each other - (drewk) - (10)
                                                                         I don't think its that clear ;-) - (bepatient) - (9)
                                                                             Which limits impact, but doesn't solve the problem - (drewk) - (8)
                                                                                 So everyone should be held to UCMJ standards? - (bepatient) - (7)
                                                                                     So you agree - (drewk) - (5)
                                                                                         nope, the military is subordinate to the people - (boxley) - (4)
                                                                                             True, but ... - (drewk) - (3)
                                                                                                 Devil's in the details. - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                                                                     Did I say prosecuted by the 'popular masses'? - (drewk) - (1)
                                                                                                         Believe this conundrum is ~ same class as - (Ashton)
                                                                                     Perhaps not EVERYBODY - but someone who makes such a... - (CRConrad)
                                 they wernt lobbyists dumass, they were oil execs, knew the - (boxley) - (1)
                                     Up next - hiring rats to set cheese management policy - (tuberculosis)
                         Absolutely not. -NT - (bepatient)
                     Up to a point - (JayMehaffey) - (13)
                         Good thing they can't then, isn't it? -NT - (bepatient) - (12)
                             What if they are pushing us down a slippery slope of secrecy -NT - (Seamus) - (11)
                                 "What if"? -NT - (pwhysall) - (10)
                                     secrecy in governmantal decisions - (Seamus) - (8)
                                         Both the laws and the policy are public - (bepatient) - (4)
                                             Let me real clear for you - (Seamus) - (3)
                                                 I don't see an issue here. - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                     My thoughts. - (Another Scott)
                                                     I am sure you don't - (Seamus)
                                         You misunderstand. - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                             ICLRPD (new thread) - (jb4)
                                             I hope I did misunderstand him - (Seamus)
                                     Gee, thanks ;-) -NT - (bepatient)

Using Powerpoint in the schools--that's better than teaching kids how to smoke.
203 ms