IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / General Q&A Forum / Wide-angle still only 36mm (equiv), though.
Post #278,559
by static
3/17/07 6:24:13 AM
Reply
New Wide-angle still only 36mm (equiv), though.
That gives me pause. I should point out that my film camera has a 24-50 lens and a 70-300 lens. And I *do* use the 24 end a bit.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·
Post #278,570
by Another Scott
3/17/07 9:04:46 AM
Reply
New Is a digital back that uses your existing lenses an option?
If they're high-end lenses, you might find a compatible back. If the cost is an issue, many places like B&H sell [link|http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=UsedHomePage.jsp&A=FetchChildren&Q=&ci=2872|used digital equipment].

Let's see, you've got a Nikon [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=277234|F60]. (I'm assuming the F70 is similar here.) It looks like your lenses [link|http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00EYZ9&tag=|should work with the D70], with some caveats (check the comments). B&H has a used D70 back for [link|http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=2891&A=details&Q=&sku=800517109&is=USE&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation|$449]. Presumably there are places in Oz that would have comparable deals.

HTH a bit. Good luck!

Cheers,
Scott.
Post #278,649
by static
3/18/07 4:17:43 AM
Reply
New Already explored.
That's why I originally picked a D70. ;-) Nikon lens compatability is legendary, and although not 100% they are very thorough at telling you what doesn't work. My lenses will work on a D70 and on a D50. They will be manual focus only on a D40, however.

I actually mentioned my lenses to show why I was favouring a bridge camera with a wider lens. My two are just ordinary consumer lenses, though each worth perhaps as much as a D50 body. Even second-hand, a D70 is nearly as much new, otherwise that's what I'd consider. I will keep looking, though, as the D70 has been superseded and people will be trading up.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·
     Camera question - looking to get a 'bridge' digital SLR. - (static) - (18) - March 15, 2007, 02:28:21 AM EDT
         I wouldn't worry about the storage format. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 15, 2007, 07:50:50 AM EDT
             I've got a Panasonic Lumix FZ-5 - (drewk) - March 15, 2007, 10:06:07 AM EDT
         I just got a Fuji Finepix s5200 - (bionerd) - March 15, 2007, 10:42:50 AM EDT
         whoops- dupe. -NT - (bionerd) - March 15, 2007, 10:43:25 AM EDT
         D40 is the entry point - (bepatient) - (3) - March 15, 2007, 11:39:36 AM EDT
             Still AU$1000 in a system. - (static) - (2) - March 15, 2007, 09:11:41 PM EDT
                 Its now under 600USD here. - (bepatient) - (1) - March 15, 2007, 09:22:05 PM EDT
                     But not with a superzoom lens - (tonytib) - March 16, 2007, 01:05:34 AM EDT
         Better name is "super zoom" - (tonytib) - March 15, 2007, 12:20:13 PM EDT
         I have powershot s2 - (tuberculosis) - (7) - March 15, 2007, 03:53:18 PM EDT
             Re: I have powershot s2 - (SpiceWare) - (6) - March 15, 2007, 08:46:50 PM EDT
                 S3 had just come out - (tuberculosis) - (5) - March 16, 2007, 06:20:22 AM EDT
                     low $300s - (SpiceWare) - (4) - March 16, 2007, 01:36:06 PM EDT
                         It has come down it was $400+ when I looked - get it! -NT - (tuberculosis) - (3) - March 16, 2007, 03:57:48 PM EDT
                             Wide-angle still only 36mm (equiv), though. - (static) - (2) - March 17, 2007, 06:24:13 AM EDT
                                 Is a digital back that uses your existing lenses an option? - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 17, 2007, 09:04:46 AM EDT
                                     Already explored. - (static) - March 18, 2007, 04:17:43 AM EDT
         Interesting find. - (static) - March 18, 2007, 06:33:02 AM EDT

There is no test like production.
84 ms