>> You call fundamental difference in how people think "simple"? I disagree. <<

It is a much "cleaner" explanation than most others floated, especially those floated at the end of heated debates :-)

>> My problem is that you don't see the relationship between action and actor. Apparently, for you, actions just happen, without any acting entity, or at least without a single main acting entity. <<

I see the relationship as open-ended and dynamic and multiple. I see the relationship to actors like *local* variables: created, used, then tossed away. IOW, the relationships are "encapsulated" within a given operation more or less. If you make it global, then you have more dependencies to change if the relationships change IMO.