since energy transforms rather than dissapate

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #274,957 by boxley 12/6/06 10:18:46 AM Reply	since energy transforms rather than dissapate and the loss of the field suggests that "some" energy has transformed/transferred. There is Peter's wooly booger, it is measurable and defined. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #274,960 by admin 12/6/06 10:47:30 AM Reply	The field lines collapse... ... and generate a negligible amount of heat. Where's the mystery in that? Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #274,961 by boxley 12/6/06 10:49:39 AM Reply	no mystery, if thats the explaination the field may just go elsewhere. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep

slow sunday? how about a discussion of quantum metaphysics - (boxley) - (54) - Dec. 3, 2006, 03:36:15 PM EST

It's bollocks. -NT - (pwhysall) - (48) - Dec. 3, 2006, 05:11:14 PM EST

wassamatta u dont understand the math? -NT - (boxley) - (47) - Dec. 3, 2006, 07:47:12 PM EST

There's nothing to understand. - (pwhysall) - (46) - Dec. 4, 2006, 01:50:11 AM EST

ICLRPDx4 - (Steve Lowe) - Dec. 4, 2006, 02:41:58 AM EST

Like string theory and dark energy - (imric) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2006, 06:53:58 AM EST

Yes, exactly like those. - (pwhysall) - Dec. 4, 2006, 07:06:33 AM EST

perhaps you missed a few things - (boxley) - (41) - Dec. 4, 2006, 09:06:17 AM EST

Re: perhaps you missed a few things - (pwhysall) - (40) - Dec. 4, 2006, 09:11:18 AM EST

Careful.. - (Ashton) - (39) - Dec. 4, 2006, 11:19:19 PM EST

some people dont grok uncertainty as certainty - (boxley) - Dec. 5, 2006, 12:05:06 AM EST

Oh please. - (pwhysall) - (35) - Dec. 5, 2006, 02:44:33 AM EST

so physics is wrong? energy dissapates? its not a constant? - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 5, 2006, 08:07:02 AM EST

Cold fusion, eh? - (pwhysall) - Dec. 5, 2006, 08:19:33 AM EST

Spent a lot of time around Jesuits? - (Ashton) - (31) - Dec. 5, 2006, 06:33:09 PM EST

Re: Spent a lot of time around Jesuits? - (pwhysall) - (30) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:21:45 AM EST

It's a Republican thing - (Ashton) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2006, 06:00:40 AM EST

Re: It's a Republican thing - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 12:32:34 PM EST

Agreeable.. - (Ashton) - Dec. 6, 2006, 06:10:51 PM EST

Science IS Philosophy. - (imric) - (26) - Dec. 6, 2006, 07:19:26 AM EST

No it isn't. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2006, 07:47:11 AM EST

Good point. Science isn't 'Philosophy' - (imric) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 08:59:29 AM EST

Re: Good point. Science isn't 'Philosophy' - (pwhysall) - Dec. 6, 2006, 09:16:52 AM EST

You don't understand the scientific method... - (pwhysall) - (22) - Dec. 6, 2006, 09:14:01 AM EST

question then - (boxley) - (12) - Dec. 6, 2006, 09:42:16 AM EST

My stab at it. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Dec. 6, 2006, 10:05:22 AM EST

since energy transforms rather than dissapate - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2006, 10:18:46 AM EST

The field lines collapse... - (admin) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 10:47:30 AM EST

no mystery, if thats the explaination - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2006, 10:49:39 AM EST

Odd question. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 10:25:42 AM EST

Agreed - - (imric) - Dec. 6, 2006, 11:03:49 AM EST

Ah, geez. - (ubernostrum) - (5) - Dec. 6, 2006, 12:38:36 PM EST

1/4 of an ounce, everybody knows that -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:36:00 PM EST

That's what, 50 bucks? -NT - (imric) - (3) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:36:35 PM EST

Up here that'll run you at least 65$CDN - (jake123) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:38:31 PM EST

is that for the good BC stuff or the ONT ragweed? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 05:43:20 PM EST

It's not ragweed anymore - (jake123) - Dec. 6, 2006, 06:23:33 PM EST

Therefore, your PHILOSOPHY - (imric) - (8) - Dec. 6, 2006, 11:02:28 AM EST

Please don't misrepresent what I said. - (pwhysall) - (5) - Dec. 6, 2006, 12:03:32 PM EST

Horse- - (imric) - (4) - Dec. 6, 2006, 12:59:47 PM EST

Whatever. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:16:04 PM EST

*chuckle* Justify Quantum Mind? - (imric) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:24:16 PM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - Dec. 7, 2006, 12:00:05 AM EST

Dupe, ignore - (pwhysall) - Dec. 6, 2006, 01:17:36 PM EST

I'm reminded of Willard Van Orman Quine - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 12:41:01 PM EST

omigawd___ the tragedy of psoriasis^h^h_ ab != ba -NT - (Ashton) - Dec. 6, 2006, 06:33:01 PM EST

Bzzzzzt - (drewk) - Dec. 5, 2006, 09:34:42 PM EST

Ooh! Me next! - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2006, 02:07:54 AM EST

Re: Ooh! Me next! - (Ashton) - Dec. 6, 2006, 06:10:14 AM EST

Another article. - (Another Scott) - Dec. 5, 2006, 07:57:25 AM EST

It's a surd - (Ashton) - Dec. 4, 2006, 03:57:32 AM EST

See. - (ubernostrum) - (3) - Dec. 5, 2006, 01:04:43 AM EST

wassamtter you quit drinking ? :-) -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 5, 2006, 08:07:51 AM EST

Nah. - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Dec. 5, 2006, 03:24:03 PM EST

ICLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Dec. 5, 2006, 03:35:06 PM EST

iwethey.org