IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Something doesn't add up
If every one of 110 million American households bought just one ice-cream-cone bulb, took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.
So 110 bulbs uses as much energy as 1.3 cars? Even if we were running generators off the rear wheels I don't think so, and commercial electricity production -- which we actually use for light bulbs -- is more efficient than that by (guessing) an order of magnitude or more. Anyone have any better numbers? Or a way to justify these?
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New I think it's something like this.
100 HP = 74.5 kW via [link|http://www.gordonengland.co.uk/conversion/power.htm|this] conversion page.

110 bulbs * 60 W = 6.6 kW - so you'd need 1240 bulbs to match a single 100 HP car.

So, it doesn't seem to add up.

The analysis seems to be based on assumptions about CO2 production. At least that's what seems to be going on if you follow the discussion [link|http://hybridblog.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/04/equating_prius_.html|here].

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Walmart to do something good?!? - (SpiceWare) - (17)
         Also use them here and there, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
             Tried some - wasn't impressed - (SpiceWare)
         Every bulb in my apt. is flourescent... -NT - (imric)
         I use them... - (Yendor)
         Every time a bulb burns out I replace with fluorescent - (admin) - (1)
             Me too. - (pwhysall)
         Stupid question - (Simon_Jester) - (5)
             I think you would need a wall wart for each - (hnick) - (2)
                 Nope... the way things are going... - (folkert) - (1)
                     Way cool, sounds nifty. Thanks for the info. - (hnick)
             CF are still more efficient. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 CF colour. - (static)
         We have several, too. - (Steve Lowe)
         Something doesn't add up - (drewk) - (1)
             I think it's something like this. - (Another Scott)
         Are they seriously known as 'ice cream cone bulbs'?! - (Meerkat) - (1)
             I haven't heard that name used, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus)

Good evening, Mr. Gates. I'll be your server tonight.
127 ms