So maybe he didn't/wasn't

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #261 by stobor 6/26/01 4:49:19 PM Reply	So maybe he didn't/wasn't But he should have. Don Richards is using this sig. Hands off!
Post #264 by ashton2 6/27/01 6:40:35 AM Reply	When he was in India, picking up on the way things seem to be - you know, in "the Missing Years"? - I have it on good Authority\ufffd (a real Popular source nowadays, that Authority guy) that his preference was for .. well, I can't reveal the name, and maybe he had some second-favs, too but even if he didn't... (but probably he Did, though..) the stories need some new blood - so WTF Was that creative writing class For, anyway? I'd provide some links natch - then ya'd Know it was True, but.. Myths are just so.. so Old, y'know? Sheesh! Next target: the Buddha - definitely too many Big Whoppers; ya can't grow that much on veggie-burgers. Confucious cheated at Go. Iconoclasts R Us By the hour day or frame.
Post #282 by Brandioch 6/27/01 4:46:23 PM Reply	Wrong Buddha. Siddartha isn't the portly fellow so often depicted. And he would have voted Republican.
Post #294 by ashton2 6/27/01 9:01:08 PM Reply	Hey.. in theological matters for long thread creation ------ Ya get to make it all turn out just the way you imagined it would. (But please to call it.. research.) I curbed my dogma, but it pissed off the pope.

This is quite spiffy - (stobor) - (29) - June 26, 2001, 09:29:46 AM EDT

No he fucking well didn't! - (CRConrad) - (28) - June 26, 2001, 04:00:00 PM EDT

Well, he gosh darn well *might* have -NT - (drewk) - (19) - June 26, 2001, 04:08:28 PM EDT

Who the fsck are YOU to say? Were you THERE??? -NT - (CRConrad) - (18) - June 26, 2001, 04:12:38 PM EDT

MIGHT MIGHT MMMMMMIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!! -NT - (drewk) - (17) - June 26, 2001, 04:30:47 PM EDT

So maybe he didn't/wasn't - (stobor) - (3) - June 26, 2001, 04:49:19 PM EDT

When he was in India, picking up on the way - (ashton2) - (2) - June 27, 2001, 06:40:35 AM EDT

Wrong Buddha. - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 27, 2001, 04:46:23 PM EDT

Hey.. in theological matters for long thread creation ------ - (ashton2) - June 27, 2001, 09:01:08 PM EDT

Wow! Now... - (CRConrad) - (12) - June 27, 2001, 10:40:43 AM EDT

Hey! WTF is wrong with you, DrooK? - (CRConrad) - (11) - June 28, 2001, 10:59:43 AM EDT

Bait, you wanna talk about bait? - (drewk) - (10) - June 28, 2001, 11:02:43 AM EDT

Yeah, but why did you stop the experiment? - (CRConrad) - (9) - June 28, 2001, 11:19:32 AM EDT

Timestamps starting to wrap - (drewk) - (8) - June 28, 2001, 11:24:02 AM EDT

Still? -NT - (admin) - (5) - June 28, 2001, 11:34:28 AM EDT

Nope. Thanks! - (CRConrad) - (4) - June 28, 2001, 11:57:09 AM EDT

Still? -NT - (admin) - (3) - June 28, 2001, 12:00:30 PM EDT

Nope - thanks again! - (CRConrad) - (2) - June 28, 2001, 12:57:08 PM EDT

Wrong. - (admin) - (1) - June 28, 2001, 01:00:46 PM EDT

Yeah, I know. T'was an intentional ref to "the competition". -NT - (CRConrad) - June 28, 2001, 01:07:08 PM EDT

Re: Timestamps- could they be in tiny fontsize? -NT - (ashton2) - (1) - June 28, 2001, 03:56:13 PM EDT

Let me work out the other kinks first. - (admin) - June 28, 2001, 04:16:28 PM EDT

I like yer sig - (boxley) - (7) - June 27, 2001, 07:09:36 PM EDT

Yes, I do... - (CRConrad) - (6) - June 27, 2001, 08:57:18 PM EDT

Insert a comma - (pwhysall) - (5) - June 28, 2001, 02:40:45 AM EDT

Well, let's just say, a prolific first-poster... -NT - (CRConrad) - (4) - June 28, 2001, 10:56:33 AM EDT

not to correct yer slang - (box) - (3) - July 2, 2001, 10:31:15 PM EDT

Possibly silly link... - (static) - (1) - July 2, 2001, 10:38:08 PM EDT

OK Wade.. it's now apparent what long exposure to a - (ashton2) - July 3, 2001, 03:06:38 AM EDT

Yeah, well, sorry - but that's not how the quote went. -NT - (CRConrad) - July 3, 2001, 09:16:04 AM EDT

Ramble on.
87 ms