IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Well, he gosh darn well *might* have
This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
New Who the fsck are YOU to say? Were you THERE???

The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything About Jesus' Habits!
New MIGHT MIGHT MMMMMMIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!
This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
New So maybe he didn't/wasn't
But he should have.
Don Richards is using this sig. Hands off!
New When he was in India, picking up on the way
things seem to be - you know, in "the Missing Years"? - I have it on good Authority\ufffd (a real Popular source nowadays, that Authority guy) that his preference was for .. well, I can't reveal the name, and maybe he had some second-favs, too but even if he didn't... (but probably he Did, though..) the stories need some new blood - so WTF Was that creative writing class For, anyway?

I'd provide some links natch - then ya'd Know it was True, but.. Myths are just so.. so Old, y'know? Sheesh!

Next target: the Buddha - definitely too many Big Whoppers; ya can't grow that much on veggie-burgers. Confucious cheated at Go.


Iconoclasts R Us
By the hour day or frame.
New Wrong Buddha.
Siddartha isn't the portly fellow so often depicted.

And he would have voted Republican.
New Hey.. in theological matters for long thread creation ------
Ya get to make it all turn out just the way you imagined it would. (But please to call it.. research.)

I curbed my dogma, but it pissed off the pope.
New Wow! Now...
...you look exactly like Bryce!

Congratulations on *that* "achievement"...

The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything About DrewK's Secret Yearning To Be Bryce
New Hey! WTF is wrong with you, DrooK?
When *that* didn't get a rise outta you?!?

Must be something serious, is all I can say.

The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything

(Except Why DrooK Didn't Rise To The Bait)
New Bait, you wanna talk about bait?
I guess it didn't occur to you that I spelled it that way on purpose? That maybe I was making a wry and subtle comment on the nature and cause of right shift? That I trusted that anyone who knows the name of The One We Shall Not Name would recognize it on their own? That it didn't really need to be pointed out like you did?

No, I guess it didn't. "Man Who Knows Fucking Everything" indeed.
This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
New Yeah, but why did you stop the experiment?
Had it reached right-shift enough for you already?

Did for me, too -- now that I looked at it on my work laptop.

See ya in the "Suggestions" forum? :-)

The Man Who Does Indeed Know Fucking Everything (Everything That Is Worth To Know, At Least, That Is...)
New Timestamps starting to wrap
I can't think of a fix for that that I don't hate even worse.
This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
New Still?
Regards,

-scott anderson
New Nope. Thanks!
Well, except in the thread view below the post bodies in the post body view, of course... :-)

The Man Who Knows Fucking Everything
New Still?
Regards,

-scott anderson
New Nope - thanks again!
Now With Handy Eazy-QuoteTM! .Sigs:

Regards,

-scott anderson


Get 'Em Here! Get 'Em While They're Hot! :-)

The Man Who Knows Everything About Fucking
New Wrong.
Now With Handy Eazy-QuoteTM! .Sigs:

No, that should be:

Handy IZ-QuoteTM! .Sigs

Or maybe ZI-Quote... dunno. I'll have to consult the trademark lawyers on that one...

:-)
Regards,

-scott anderson
New Yeah, I know. T'was an intentional ref to "the competition".
New Re: Timestamps- could they be in tiny fontsize?
New Let me work out the other kinks first.
Other than gross UI defects, I'd rather let the visual stuff wait a bit until the underpinnings are more stable.
Regards,

-scott anderson
     This is quite spiffy - (stobor) - (29)
         No he fucking well didn't! - (CRConrad) - (28)
             Well, he gosh darn well *might* have -NT - (drewk) - (19)
                 Who the fsck are YOU to say? Were you THERE??? -NT - (CRConrad) - (18)
                     MIGHT MIGHT MMMMMMIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!! -NT - (drewk) - (17)
                         So maybe he didn't/wasn't - (stobor) - (3)
                             When he was in India, picking up on the way - (ashton2) - (2)
                                 Wrong Buddha. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                                     Hey.. in theological matters for long thread creation ------ - (ashton2)
                         Wow! Now... - (CRConrad) - (12)
                             Hey! WTF is wrong with you, DrooK? - (CRConrad) - (11)
                                 Bait, you wanna talk about bait? - (drewk) - (10)
                                     Yeah, but why did you stop the experiment? - (CRConrad) - (9)
                                         Timestamps starting to wrap - (drewk) - (8)
                                             Still? -NT - (admin) - (5)
                                                 Nope. Thanks! - (CRConrad) - (4)
                                                     Still? -NT - (admin) - (3)
                                                         Nope - thanks again! - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                                             Wrong. - (admin) - (1)
                                                                 Yeah, I know. T'was an intentional ref to "the competition". -NT - (CRConrad)
                                             Re: Timestamps- could they be in tiny fontsize? -NT - (ashton2) - (1)
                                                 Let me work out the other kinks first. - (admin)
             I like yer sig - (boxley) - (7)
                 Yes, I do... - (CRConrad) - (6)
                     Insert a comma - (pwhysall) - (5)
                         Well, let's just say, a prolific first-poster... -NT - (CRConrad) - (4)
                             not to correct yer slang - (box) - (3)
                                 Possibly silly link... - (static) - (1)
                                     OK Wade.. it's now apparent what long exposure to a - (ashton2)
                                 Yeah, well, sorry - but that's not how the quote went. -NT - (CRConrad)

I have seen them...
212 ms