IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New John Yoo on Supreme Court Gitmo ruling
[link|http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/weekinreview/02liptak.html?_r=2&oref=slogin|NY Times]
JOHN C. YOO, a principal architect of the Bush administration's legal response to the terrorist threat, sounded perplexed and a little bitter on Thursday afternoon. A few hours earlier, the Supreme Court had methodically dismantled the legal framework that he and a few other administration lawyers had built after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

"What the court is doing is attempting to suppress creative thinking," said Professor Yoo, who now teaches law at the University of California, Berkeley. "The court has just declared that it's going to be very intrusive in the war on terror. They're saying, 'We're going to treat this more like the way we supervise the criminal justice system.' "

I wouldn't even post this, except Yoo's comment makes me want to grab him and slap him. Look at what he said there and think about it for a moment. Yoo is complaining that the court is "attempting to suppress creating thinking," as if that was a bad thing. But preventing lawyers from twisting the law is exactly what the courts are supposed to do.

Jay
New Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Guess he just wasn't creative enough.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Yeah... what they did is pretty much their job to do.
Of course, it stands in the way of the Empire, so it's bad.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New what is really stupid is that ample precedent has been set
to attack terriorists as we need to. It is admiralty law, has the force of many nations behind it. Declare them pirates instead of enemy combatants and hang their ass from the nearest yardarm.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Indeed
and the question of citizens participating can be dealt with using the laws on treason (which are still on the books in Canada at least, though they're not being used by the morons on Parliament Hill.)
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Pirates is closer to the truth.
They are, in reality, criminals. This is NOT a war. And we NEED to stop calling it that. We need to do what we did when Ramzi Yosef tried to blow up the buildings the first time. Use the police to arrest them, then prosecute and sentence them.

The opportunity to do that, I think, has been forever lost. More is the pity.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New no, they are outlaws, there is a difference
pirates, navy, army marines in response
[link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_pirates|http://en.wikipedia....i/Barbary_pirates]
Though at least a proportion of them are better described as privateers, the Barbary pirates were pirates that operated out of Tunis, Tripoli, Algiers, Sal\ufffd and ports in Morocco, preying on shipping in the western Mediterranean Sea from the time of the Crusades as well as on ships on their way to Asia around Africa until the early 19th century. Their stronghold was along the stretch of northern Africa known as the Barbary Coast (a medieval term for the Maghreb after its Berber inhabitants), although their predation was said to extend as far north as Iceland, and south along West Africa's Atlantic seaboard. As well as preying on shipping, raids were often made on European coastal towns. The pirates were responsible for capturing large numbers of Christian slaves from Western Europe, who were sold in slave markets in places such as Morocco. Sultan Mawlay Ismail had a very substantial fortified palace built almost entirely by Christian slave labour obtained through the actions of Barbary pirates.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Not winning in the Italian Courts either
[link|http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/05/news/web.0705italy.php|Arrest warrants for 4 CIA operatives] will likely create further cracks in the creative solutions (like kidnapping).
     John Yoo on Supreme Court Gitmo ruling - (JayMehaffey) - (7)
         Sounds like sour grapes to me. - (bepatient) - (1)
             Yeah... what they did is pretty much their job to do. - (admin)
         what is really stupid is that ample precedent has been set - (boxley) - (3)
             Indeed - (jake123)
             Pirates is closer to the truth. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 no, they are outlaws, there is a difference - (boxley)
         Not winning in the Italian Courts either - (ChrisR)

It’s the extra touches.
44 ms