No, but

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #260,415 by JayMehaffey 6/29/06 12:39:30 PM Reply	No, but No, but it apparently does include "even if we where to accept that the President has the war time power to do this, attempting to justify this tribunal process by referencing the President's emergency war powers is inherently defective when Congress has not declared war. Duh." Jay
Post #260,422 by drewk 6/29/06 12:58:16 PM Reply	Do you have any idea how much I would pay ... ... to read an actual USSC decision that included the word "Duh"? === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]

USSC spanks Bush - (jake123) - (6) - June 29, 2006, 11:37:09 AM EDT

Here's some more on this: - (jb4) - June 29, 2006, 12:24:11 PM EDT

Did the decision include the phrase ... - (drewk) - (2) - June 29, 2006, 12:24:54 PM EDT

No, but - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - June 29, 2006, 12:39:30 PM EDT

Do you have any idea how much I would pay ... - (drewk) - June 29, 2006, 12:58:16 PM EDT

The Opinion. - (Another Scott) - (1) - June 29, 2006, 01:20:56 PM EDT

Reading Thomas and Scalia is ALWAYS startling. - (jb4) - June 29, 2006, 02:02:19 PM EDT

iwethey.org

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
38 ms