IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Some links I found
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0914732242/ref=pd_sxp_elt_l1/104-2586768-5548760|The sacred symbols of MU]

[link|http://www.conceptual.net.au/~jackc/mu.htm|The temple of Mu]

I wish I could find more that are not like UFO Conspiracy sites talking about a lost contenent, or some other crap. It may have been more like an island that sunk or something.

Churchward claimed that Christianity has the same rules as those that Osasis used over 10,000 years ago, that both are based on the teachings of Mu? Is this correct, or just a big coincidence?

"Will code Visual BASIC for cash."
New It is made-up BS
There is a reason that most of the sites linking to this are things like UFO conspiracy sites.

There is no solid archeological or geological evidence that Mu existed. It was dreamed up by people who believed in Atlantis, saw that the Pacific was a bigger and better ocean, and reasoned that the Pacific must therefore have had a bigger and better lost continent. They made up the name Mu for this, and went from there to "proving" that it existed, and doing "research" on what life there was like (much of which consists of testimonials from people who "remember" past lives there - never mind conflicts between different accounts or contradictions with archeological evidence). Many have tied all of this in to visits from advanced alien civilizations (aka UFOs).

Believe me or not, but I am strongly advising you to keep an eye on your BS meter, because if it is at all functional it is going to be pegged pretty quickly. You shouldn't be asking whether it is coincidence that Christianity has the same rules that were used on Oasis 10,000 years ago. You should be asking how the f*ck they know what rules were used on Oasis 10,000 years ago, or are they just blowing solid smoke out their collective asses? (Guess what I believe?)

And, having made my opinion on this crap utterly clear, I won't bother posting any more on it. I hope you get some amusement value from the topic because that is all it is worth.

Cheers,
Ben
     The ancient teachings of Mu - (nking) - (22)
         I wouldn't believe it - (ben_tilly)
         Some links I found - (nking) - (1)
             It is made-up BS - (ben_tilly)
         Re: The ancient teachings of Mu - (pwhysall) - (3)
             And do they drive an ice-cream van? -NT - (Meerkat) - (1)
                 Mine's a 99. -NT - (pwhysall)
             Time for the JAMs. - (admin)
         Dont read any L Ron Hubbard Books - (boxley) - (10)
             Good choice - (wharris2) - (7)
                 Movie- - (Silverlock) - (1)
                     It's early in the week - (wharris2)
                 Hey I kinda liked his sci fi - (boxley) - (3)
                     Which SF? - (wharris2) - (1)
                         battlefield earth was a cartoon in words - (boxley)
                     Wasn't bad... - (admin)
                 I read the book. - (static)
             One thing you have to credit L. Ron - (Ashton) - (1)
                 Daggone it - (wharris2)
         For a more real version, look up Zoroaster - (mhuber) - (3)
             hey bawb - (boxley) - (1)
                 Thanks - couldn't recall the author's name right off -NT - (mhuber)
             Love. It. - (Ashton)

Damn, it was going to be a crowded tent.
251 ms