You don't know me *that* well.

Post #258,258 by admin 6/8/06 8:51:24 PM Reply	You don't know me that well. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #258,264 by ben_tilly 6/8/06 9:33:42 PM Reply	Oooh, this is an argument I want to see at Beeps! Of course what we won't see is all of the stuff that neither of you will admit to. I'm not sure which of you that favours. I note that at [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=128365\|http://z.iwethey.org...?contentid=128365] you declined to take the test and report a score. [link\|http://www.hotlanta.com/helltest.htm\|http://www.hotlanta.com/helltest.htm] may be the same as that one, in which case we can get a point of comparison between the two of you. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,270 by admin 6/8/06 10:28:16 PM Reply	That test covers signicantly more than lechery. And I suspect the Barry scored quite a bit higher on some portions of that test for obvious reasons. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #258,284 by broomberg 6/9/06 7:27:49 AM Reply	And is is also light on lechery I can think of a bunch of things that should rate their own questions yet don't show up.
Post #258,306 by ben_tilly 6/9/06 2:10:09 PM Reply	Suggested resolution... Both you and Scott prepare a lechery test for the other to take. Both of you include your own scores on your own test. That test can have lots of things that you've done and won't admit to because it will also have lots of things that you haven't done. Nobody will know which things you have and haven't done. The name of the game is plausible deniability. The showdown can be at the Beep bash. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,317 by admin 6/9/06 4:14:43 PM Reply	Lechery isn't just what you've done, anyway Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #258,331 by ben_tilly 6/9/06 5:20:46 PM Reply	Ah yes. You're a man of much thought and little action. I thought about the idea of a "lechery test" at beepbash. I figured that we'd probably get Dave, boxley, broomberg and then you. :-P Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,332 by admin 6/9/06 5:29:16 PM Reply	Like I said, you don't know me very well. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #258,335 by imqwerky 6/9/06 5:34:59 PM Reply	And to think this all started because... I said you were impersonating two characters in a book. Two Female characters. Well, we shall have to have a read-off as well, don't ya think? Maybe even put on a short skit or one act play. Barry can be Casanunda :-) Now, there is a lecher!
Post #258,343 by broomberg 6/9/06 6:49:28 PM Reply	Needs a review panel for weighting #1 - Action speak louder than thoughts. If you really think you should get points for thoughts, fine, but actions should be weighted with a multiplier. #2 - Individual Yes No scores should not have the same value for wildly varying activities. Some things are much more "valuable" from a points perspective. So, we need a range of possible weighting factors, let's say 1-5. And it only applies to actions, not thoughts.
Post #258,346 by drewk 6/9/06 7:27:42 PM Reply	WAAAAAAAAYYYYYY too much work And you're going to ask someone to do math late in a BeepBash? Chyeah. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #258,348 by ben_tilly 6/9/06 8:33:18 PM Reply	Remind me to do that. Flummoxing someone like that sounds fun. That also reminds me that I want a chessboard. So I can try playing Skip blindfold. :-) Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,354 by broomberg 6/9/06 9:48:02 PM Reply	Simple spreadsheet Prebeep we gather the list of offences. At Beep, we call out the offence, and let people shout a number from 1-5. You've got to think that the calling out of the offense will be entertaining enough to keep people's attention. If not, then it is not good enough to be included anyway. No agreement? Screw it, who ever is typing chooses the answer.
Post #258,357 by imqwerky 6/9/06 10:19:37 PM Reply	Ok, this is starting to get GOOD! should we all submit offenses until we have, oh, 50 of them?
Post #258,361 by broomberg 6/9/06 10:35:16 PM Reply	Numbers shouldn't matter How warped is your imagination? Start submitting, I'll throw them into a spreadsheet.
Post #258,378 by tuberculosis 6/10/06 12:29:59 AM 8/21/07 5:46:35 AM Reply	Geeze - its like the Aristocrats Which, when I think of it, perhaps ought to be the test. [link\|http://www.blackbagops.net\|Black Bag Operations Log] [link\|http://www.objectiveclips.com\|Artificial Intelligence] [link\|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html\|Scrutinizer] Edited by tuberculosis Aug. 21, 2007, 05:46:35 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #258,443 by imqwerky 6/10/06 10:19:37 PM Reply	My 19 yr old said the same thing! I about crapped my pants :)
Post #258,365 by ben_tilly 6/9/06 10:53:36 PM 6/10/06 10:16:21 PM Reply	No time like the present to get going... Lemme get this on the road. I'm trying to keep this one gender-neutral. BTW Had sex Had sex with an age gap of > 5 years Had sex with an age gap of > 10 years Had sex with an age gap of > 20 years Had sex with an age gap of > 30 years Had sex with an age gap of > 40 years Hit on friend's SO At friend's suggestion Had sex with friend's SO At friend's suggestion Hit on relative's SO At relative's suggestion Had sex with relative's SO At relative's suggestion Hit on SO's friend Hit on multiple friends of SO? Hit on SO's friend while SO was present Had sex with SO's friend Had sex with multiple friends of SO At the same time Had sex with SO's friend while SO was present (accidental discovery OK) SO was involved in sex with friend Asked friend to hit on SO Friend had sex with SO Friend had sex with SO while you were present You and friend had sex with SO You and SO tried wife swapping You and SO are swingers Hit on inlaws (long-term committed relationship counts as marriage for this) Hit on multiple inlaws Hit on inlaws while SO was present Had sex with inlaws Had sex with multiple inlaws At the same time Had sex with inlaw while SO was present Had sex with inlaw and SO together Had an affair (must be relationship SO would not approve of) Had an affair that SO knows about Had an affair while SO was present (accidental discovery OK) Have a pregnancy to your credit Have a pregnancy to your credit from an affair Your SO doesn't know about said pregnancy Your SO knows about said pregnancy Are involved in pregnancy where parentage was uncertain Are involved in pregnancy where parentage was uncertain and one of the potential dads wasn't informed of the uncertainty I could easily continue the list. But I think that does for a start. Someone else's turn. Cheers, Ben PS Updated to add some obvious ones that I was missing. Sorry Amy, no animals or sex with your own relatives yet. Why don't you ask those questions? I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly June 10, 2006, 10:16:21 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #258,382 by imqwerky 6/10/06 12:46:59 AM Reply	What? No animals or relatives?
Post #258,386 by ben_tilly 6/10/06 3:04:46 AM Reply	Hey, I was just starting the list I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,401 by imqwerky 6/10/06 10:46:45 AM Reply	:-D
Post #258,403 by inthane-chan 6/10/06 10:50:18 AM Reply	That's either sad or good. I can only answer yes to one of those questions. When somebody asks you to trade your freedoms for security, it isn't your* security they're talking about.*
Post #258,405 by imqwerky 6/10/06 10:55:29 AM Reply	<Halo>Thane</Halo>
Post #258,407 by inthane-chan 6/10/06 11:48:07 AM Reply	I scored more pure than Jesus once on a purity test. Now, I don't. When somebody asks you to trade your freedoms for security, it isn't your* security they're talking about.*
Post #258,442 by ben_tilly 6/10/06 10:09:17 PM Reply	What? Nobody else wants to contribute? Come on, am I the only person who will share the kinds of things that I can think of that happen with sex? So far I've just had questions about who you have had sex with. I haven't even covered that ground very well. For instance a few more: Had sex with strangers you just met? Frequently? Multiple times in a night? Multiple strangers at once? Later accidentally encountered one in a very different social setting? There are no questions about the act yet. I really don't feel qualified to fill this in, but I've known people who've most of the following: French-kissed? (Here Thane! A freebie!) Had a 3-way French kiss? Masturbated? (Special for Thane! You can count yourself as corrupted now!) Where you could be caught? In a public place? Masturbated someone else? Where you could be caught? In a public place? Had sex where you could be caught? In a public place? Seen pornography? Seen pornography in a theater? Filmed yourself having sex? Shown the video to others? Been to a strip club? As a performer? Had vaginal intercourse? Oral intercourse? Anal intercourse? Participated in 2 of these at once? (You might not have been the person to whom both were happening.) Participated in all 3 at once? (Ditto.) Had 69? Had > 1 orgasm in 24 hours? > 2? > 3? > 5? Caused > 1 orgasm in 24 hours? (Your own don't count.) > 2? > 3? > 5? > 10? Caused > 1 person to orgasm in 24 hours? (You don't count.) > 2? > 3? > 5? > 10? Had sex continuously for >15 minutes? > 30 minutes? > 1 hour? To the point of physical pain? Had oral intercourse with a gag reflex involved? Was there vomit? Kept eyes open while orgasming during sex? Were you looking in your partner's eyes? Used lingerie during sex? Used toys during sex? Used roleplay during sex? Had partner pretend to be person you'd rather be fucking? Was it someone you both knew? Pretended to be person your partner would rather fuck? Was it someone you both knew? Tried water sports? (If you have to ask what that is, you haven't.) Tried strangulation? Tried S&M? As top? As bottom? Suffered/inflicted injury during sex? (Accident OK.) Continued anyways? Intentionally did it again? Suffered/inflicted serious injury during sex? (Accident OK.) Continued anyways? Intentionally did it again? () Now come on, there must be someone who is willing to add to this list some things they have ~~done~~heard of... Cheers, Ben ) Note, this is the only item that I don't personally know someone who I think has done. I've done very little, but I know people... I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,445 by imqwerky 6/10/06 10:59:04 PM 6/11/06 11:57:29 AM Reply	You want more, you got more! Have you had phone sex(with someone you know)? Have you called a 900 number (phone sex with someone you don't know)? Have you had IM sex? Have you ever had sex that involved flavored lubricants? Have you ever used water in oral sex? Did you ever look at an animal and think "If Only!"? Do you have to take showers to hide your masturbating? Do you take your laptop into the bathroom to look at porn? Did you ever get anybody drunk just to shag their brains out? Shortest time between meeting and humping(without money being exchanged) <1 week, < 1day, < 1 hour, < 15 mins. Have you ever been to a Rainbow Party? Have you ever participated in an orgy? Do you think about sex 24/7? Is the song "Aqualung" a mild representation of your personality? Do you look at every person you meet as a potential lay? If you answer yes to the last five questions, you win the contest! And, uh, stand over there...yeah, waaaay over there, ok? Thanks. LOL Edited by imqwerky June 10, 2006, 11:12:35 PM EDT Edited by imqwerky June 10, 2006, 11:13:46 PM EDT Edited by imqwerky June 10, 2006, 11:29:22 PM EDT Edited by imqwerky June 11, 2006, 11:57:29 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #258,447 by ben_tilly 6/10/06 11:53:59 PM Reply	:-) Anyone else? I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,480 by bionerd 6/11/06 11:32:22 AM Reply	Dont rush me. I'm thinking. Follow your MOUSE
Post #258,581 by bionerd 6/12/06 11:14:49 AM Reply	Here you go- Have you ever watched sex in a movie? Have you tried to copy what they do? Was it groovy? In a car while driving fast? With other drivers whizzing past? I wonder how long that would last. (Before someone ends up in a cast) In the back seat in a cab? Driving the taxi driver mad? On an airplane? In a train? On the hood of a car? Maybe outside in the rain? In a restroom? Please be quiet. The person in the next stall Might want to try it. Have you had sex on a beach? With other couples within arms reach? On a Harley? In a truck? In the neighbor\ufffds pool? Now there\ufffds a good _______. (Sorry. It rhymed.) Have you had sex that made you cry? So good that you want to die? Where time stands still and hearts beat fast The kind you want to last and last? Have you faked it? Or has she? You probably wouldn\ufffdt know, you see. Especially if it was me. With how many people have been? 50? 25? Maybe 10? Any tattoos or piercings to titillate? What about shaving to excite your mate? Wearing a mask? Using a feather? Oh what fun can be had together! Follow your MOUSE
Post #258,582 by drewk 6/12/06 11:17:25 AM Reply	I do! I like them, Sam I Am! === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #258,592 by boxley 6/12/06 12:35:07 PM Reply	in a train on a train Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #258,595 by bionerd 6/12/06 12:58:53 PM Reply	With a fox, with a Box.... Follow your MOUSE
Post #258,603 by drewk 6/12/06 2:07:54 PM Reply	Wait wait wait From now on whenever I hear "Fox in socks" all I'll think is "... and a smile". And ... Is that "in a box" or "in the box" or "with a Box"? === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #258,596 by imqwerky 6/12/06 1:32:12 PM Reply	Brilliant! I don't think I have ever heard A chick as cool as Bionerd Smile, Amy [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman\|Pics of the Family]
Post #258,648 by ben_tilly 6/12/06 5:27:01 PM Reply	Wow. Just wow. Give it a title and repost it elsewhere. That's good enough to go around the net a few times. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,726 by cforde 6/13/06 12:40:30 AM Reply	not so fast, take it slow... Have fun, Carl Forde
Post #258,483 by imqwerky 6/11/06 11:49:57 AM Reply	If this helps at all, the definition of lecher... Looks like I will be editing my test questions :-/ lech\ufffder n. A man with strong sexual desires. [Middle English, from Old French lecheor, from lechier, to lick, to live in debauchery, of Germanic origin; ] Synonyms: degenerate, deviant, pervert - a person whose behavior deviates from what is acceptable especially in sexual behavior Smile, Amy [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman\|Pics of the Family]
Post #258,485 by pwhysall 6/11/06 11:56:15 AM Reply	Re: If this helps at all, the definition of lecher... Big list of perversions [link\|http://tinyurl.com/fv6cu\|here], if that helps. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes! [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall\|A better terminal emulator]
Post #258,486 by imqwerky 6/11/06 12:00:34 PM Reply	Actually, there's a better list [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman\|Here] Smile, Amy [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman\|Pics of the Family]
Post #258,491 by admin 6/11/06 12:45:31 PM Reply	Which is why insistence on acts performed is wrong... Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #258,493 by ben_tilly 6/11/06 12:59:54 PM 6/11/06 1:17:55 PM Reply	If the desire is strong enough, it will turn into action :-P But if it makes it easier, we could alter the test from, "Which of these have you done?" to "Which of these have you masturbated to thoughts of doing?" That massively lowers the bar. And makes it just thoughts. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother) Edited by ben_tilly June 11, 2006, 01:17:55 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #258,502 by imqwerky 6/11/06 1:20:01 PM Reply	OMFGROFLMAO! Smile, Amy [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman\|Pics of the Family]
Post #258,496 by imqwerky 6/11/06 1:08:12 PM Reply	So, what have you thought about doing? Hmmmmm? Smile, Amy [link\|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?Amy%20Rathman\|Pics of the Family]
Post #258,498 by broomberg 6/11/06 1:11:03 PM Reply	Ya wanna just give up now? You are arguing to be a scumbag. And you are trying to do it based on thoughts. If it was thoughts alone, with the exception of a few items (very few), I'd say yup, check it off, move on. Most of us with a bit of testosterone and mildly attractive aquaintences would do the same. Or so I believe. The real test is given a chance, do you act upon it. And not given a chance, do you make a chance.
Post #258,501 by ben_tilly 6/11/06 1:13:57 PM Reply	ICLRPD (new thread) Created as new thread #258500 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=258500\|ICLRPD] I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,593 by boxley 6/12/06 12:38:26 PM Reply	as told to true story house with about 8 guys one gal, lots of snort around the girl has to sit down to take care of a rumble in the gut so to speak. One of the players walks in and goes while you are sitting there anyway take care of this, she does thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #258,369 by boxley 6/9/06 11:21:02 PM Reply	Ahem, Laura, you know me better than most here, who wins the sheer lechery contest? (barry is a close second) thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #258,372 by bionerd 6/9/06 11:47:50 PM Reply	Hard to say. I dont know Barry like I know you, but it's safe to assume I'd be hard pressed to find anyone more lecherous than Mr. Bill. Follow your MOUSE
Post #258,374 by boxley 6/9/06 11:50:51 PM Reply	we've compared notes close second but he got married early so didnt have as many years in the wild. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #258,394 by broomberg 6/10/06 9:22:46 AM Reply	Ahem Semi domesticated includes MANY more years.
Post #258,296 by ben_tilly 6/9/06 10:34:21 AM Reply	Um you don't get a score like Barry's by... scoring highly on some portions of the test. You get it by scoring highly on all portions of the test! (Lechery included.) Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #258,298 by admin 6/9/06 10:37:06 AM Reply	You misread what I wrote. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #258,307 by ben_tilly 6/9/06 2:13:01 PM Reply	Reading it more carefully... You're right that Barry's overall score is likely to be higher than yours. But my point was that he can't be missing much on any section, lechery included, if he got the score he did. So if unless you have close to a perfect score on that, Barry beat you on that section too. Anyways this is not a good way to resolve this question. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)

Welcome to IWETHEY!