IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New What was the definition of alcoholic?
It used to be that the test that doctors were taught to use was, "If he drinks more than you, then he's an alcoholic."

Given the amount of alcohol that it was customary for doctors to consume at the time, this test was more accurate than you might expect.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New Re: What was the definition of alcoholic?
When you need a drink to stay normal.

That's alcoholic.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New depends on the deginition of normal doesnt it
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New These days the working definition is
if you are repeatedly experiencing negative consequences as a result of your drinking and you don't modify your behavior, you're an alcoholic. Negative consequences include things like wrecking your car, losing your job etc.



[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
New AKA "staying normal"


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Not necessarily
Because you can abuse etoh and experience negative consequences and not have a physiological/pyschological dependency.

Or, you can be etoh dependent and not experience any negative consequences because you have an army of enablers protecting you from from said consequences.
Follow your MOUSE
New You're more or less right.
But the term "alcoholic" isnt a diagnostic label. We look at etoh use on a continuum- a progression of use from etoh use--->abuse----> etoh dependence. Someone who is at the end stage of dependence would be your classic alcoholic- someone who has both a physiological and psychological addiction and is at risk of withdrawal if they stop drinking.

I'm working with a client who suffers from severe withdrawal symptoms- seizures, DT's, etc. She drinks to keep from dying. She has been sober for 6 months, but any uncomfortable physical feeling she experiences can trigger a relapse, because in her mind,she irrationally believes any physical sensation is the start of a seizure and she then has the urge to drink to stay alive. She perceives this belief to be rational because for the last 25 years, this has been her life. Every day is a battle for her. She hasnt relapsed yet and she is one of the most courageous women I have ever met.
Follow your MOUSE
     Today I had to sit for an exam - (bionerd) - (21)
         What was the definition of alcoholic? - (ben_tilly) - (6)
             Re: What was the definition of alcoholic? - (pwhysall) - (5)
                 depends on the deginition of normal doesnt it -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                     These days the working definition is - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                         AKA "staying normal" -NT - (pwhysall)
                         Not necessarily - (bionerd)
                 You're more or less right. - (bionerd)
         Thats a tough one. - (Silverlock)
         I got my scores today - (bionerd) - (12)
             Ironic - (ben_tilly)
             Excellent! Should we invite Cable back? -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 I don't think that was exactly an addition problem - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                     He didn't know how to ADD? -NT - (imqwerky)
             Way to go! - (imqwerky) - (1)
                 I can share a few good ones with you. - (bionerd)
             there's an invitation... - (cforde)
             Impressive! - (warmachine) - (2)
                 Why, thank you! - (bionerd) - (1)
                     Just imagine how well you'd have done... - (jb4)
             Too early in the morning - (jbrabeck)
             Woo! Nicely done! - (Meerkat)

Note for the linguistically-impaired: That was a rhetorical question. (Second note, for the vocabulary-challenged: That means you're not supposed to answer it.)
48 ms