if you mean access lists (ACL) you need both

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #254,464

by boxley

5/4/06 6:28:36 PM

if you mean access lists (ACL) you need both

tcp wrappers is a standard nix acl, user:group is still needed for granularity.
thanx,
bill

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep

ACLs versus UNIX User:Group security? - (inthane-chan) - (14) - May 4, 2006, 04:48:59 PM EDT

if you mean access lists (ACL) you need both - (boxley) - May 4, 2006, 06:28:36 PM EDT

Remember, complex does not mean secure - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 4, 2006, 07:11:27 PM EDT

Besides which, I am under the impression - (jake123) - (3) - May 4, 2006, 09:46:47 PM EDT

My impression contradicts that -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 5, 2006, 02:23:11 AM EDT

Nah. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 5, 2006, 02:47:08 AM EDT

Bolt-on? How so? - (folkert) - May 5, 2006, 09:46:35 AM EDT

On "real security weenies"... - (inthane-chan) - (4) - May 5, 2006, 10:56:58 AM EDT

But some are better than others - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 5, 2006, 11:11:08 AM EDT

Awooga! Pedant alert! - (pwhysall) - May 6, 2006, 05:10:47 AM EDT

except for the giant gapers in it, ask skip offline -NT - (boxley) - (1) - May 6, 2006, 10:49:59 AM EDT

Will do but... - (ben_tilly) - May 8, 2006, 11:18:55 AM EDT

Linux has both. - (broomberg) - May 4, 2006, 10:16:06 PM EDT

UNIX has ACLs. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 5, 2006, 01:58:36 AM EDT

see my "Bolt on? How so?" post. -NT - (folkert) - May 5, 2006, 09:47:57 AM EDT

iwethey.org