IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New We don't have to tell anyone our profile
If we're using profiles, it is easy to figure it out from what we do. And then becomes easy to subvert.

Also 80 year old grandma isn't necessarily an unnecessary screening. You never know, she might be carrying an "interesting package" from her son-in-law. And if we're screening everyone else, don't think that terrorists won't think of that angle.

Cheers,
Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New Not so simple
because your article also points out the other necessary ingredient...which is an intelligent set of screeners and a process that does stray from the profile often enough to make it less evident. Its essentially a combination of approaches.

And I'll take my chances on that 80 year old Wisconsin woman's son before I'll take a chance on an 18-26 yr old male smelling of flower water and being recently shaven.

In the meantime, we're all chatting about something that is irrelevent...because it is highly unlikely that this plot will be repeated, ever...basically due to the door reinforcements making it near impossible for a small group of people to gain control of the aircraft.

Bombs are the possibility now...and THAT we should be able to catch with current tech...but since we all think $99 round trip is a God-given right...its likely we won't see that tech fully deployed anytime soon.

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Technology isn't the answer
Well-trained, motivated people is the answer.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Yeah, but that would mean that you'd have to
pay them well, and we can't have that.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
     Air passenger screening makes us less secure - (tuberculosis) - (15)
         You're obviously marked as a questionable character. - (a6l6e6x) - (4)
             Not even the TSA is dumb enough... - (jb4)
             Call me "Shifty". -NT - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                 Actually, there could be someone else with the same name... - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                     There was - but he's dead now - (tuberculosis)
         Non-linear logical leap - (bepatient) - (9)
             Being PC is more secure than profiling - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                 There is random..then there is random - (bepatient) - (4)
                     We don't have to tell anyone our profile - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                         Not so simple - (bepatient) - (2)
                             Technology isn't the answer - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                 Yeah, but that would mean that you'd have to - (jake123)
             Who owns Capps II? - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                 That's wonderful. - (pwhysall)
                 DHS owns that. - (bepatient)

The Pseudo Markov Chain O' Puerile Musings.
67 ms