IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Latest numbers and info from the IRS.
[link|http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98968,00.html|Linky]:

The annual exclusion for gifts is raised to $12,000 beginning in 2006

The applicable exclusion amount is increased to $2,000,000 for estates and remains at $1,000,000 for gifts

[...]

Most gifts are not subject to the gift tax and most estates are not subject to the estate tax. (Only about 2% of all estates are subject to the estate tax). For example, there is usually no tax if you make a gift to your spouse or a qualified charity or if your estate goes to your spouse or qualified charity at your death. If you make a gift to someone else, the gift tax does not apply until the value of the gifts you give that person is more than the annual exclusion for the year.

[...]

The person who receives your gift or your estate generally will not have to pay any gift tax or estate tax because of it. In addition, that person will not have to pay income tax on the value of the gift or inheritance received. NOTE: There are some technical applications for "Income in Respect of Decedent" under \ufffd691 that will have to be considered for income earned but not otherwise taxed prior to the date of death.

[...]


IOW, you can give $12,000 per year to someone without any tax implications. You can, over your lifetime, give away $1M without any tax implications. Estates smaller than $2M at death are not taxed. The recipient is not taxed - the estate is.

It's hard for me to get riled up about 2% of estates being subject to estate taxes. YMMV.

The maximum estate tax rate is 47% [link|http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i706.pdf|Form 706 Instructions]. It's graduated from 18% (for taxable amounts over $10k), to 47% (for taxable amounts over $2M) - Table A.

As Ben has said, we can argue about where the tax should kick in and how high the tax rate should be. But the tax serves a useful purpose and should be retained for large estates.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Estate tax level is current wacky
The estate tax is currently going through a wacky cycle based on a bit that was part of Bush's tax reduction thing a few years ago. Every year until 2009 the tax rate goes down and the point where it kicks in goes up. And that is before getting into the real nitty gritty. There are a bunch of special exceptions and tax modifiers that only apply in certain cases.

Then in 2010 there is no estate tax at all. But then in 2011 it jumps back to where it was in 2002. Bush did that with several taxes so he could claim they wouldn't have huge long term effects.

You can see the general details on [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estate_tax|Wikipedia].

I fully expect something will be done at some point to make some sense of this.

Jay
     18 wealthy families behind estate tax repeal movement. - (inthane-chan) - (87)
         And rightly so. - (pwhysall)
         the income/equity has already been taxed once - (boxley) - (84)
             Disagree. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 There are many bad things in life. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     "They'll tax the pennies on your eyes" (new thread) - (jb4)
                 hogwash, you think they sit around on piles of money? - (boxley)
             What is fair? - (ben_tilly) - (76)
                 so if you get mugged its fair if you are rich? -NT - (boxley) - (75)
                     It's income. Tax it. -NT - (Silverlock) - (74)
                         Fair enough. As income. -NT - (imric)
                         income should be taxed, savings from income already taxed - (boxley) - (72)
                             Exactly. -NT - (pwhysall)
                             That is it in a nutshell. - (bepatient) - (42)
                                 Bah. - (Another Scott) - (23)
                                     how very marxist of you - (boxley) - (19)
                                         I don't think Teddy was a Marxist. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             For those who don't understand that comment... - (ben_tilly)
                                         You have to have balance - (ben_tilly) - (16)
                                             so advocating theft of private property to balance power is - (boxley) - (15)
                                                 Yes, it is. - (ben_tilly) - (14)
                                                     Oh you mean national socialism, got it -NT - (boxley) - (13)
                                                         Nice insult - (ben_tilly) - (12)
                                                             not an isult just a description of what you want to do - (boxley) - (11)
                                                                 Then use another description - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                                                                     well lets see, that party believed that all wealth was at - (boxley) - (9)
                                                                         You been taking rhetoric lessons from BeeP? - (jb4) - (8)
                                                                             Sorry Ben, Ascribed a quote from Todd to You - (boxley) - (7)
                                                                                 I don't think that's the "banker" he meant - (drewk) - (5)
                                                                                     maybe not but the freekin local squire with his hand out - (boxley) - (3)
                                                                                         What are you gonna do with it - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                                                                                             I think my kids could sqander as efficiently as a government -NT - (boxley)
                                                                                             Not spend it on invading Iraq, for one thing. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                                                                     It was a reference to Monopoly -NT - (tuberculosis)
                                                                                 The usual quote is "rags to rags in three generations" - (ben_tilly)
                                     And you'll see me be very consistent - (bepatient)
                                     I see your Bah and raise you a Feh. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                         Wow, is that ever a 'well worn' arguement. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 Cry me up a river - (ben_tilly) - (12)
                                     so having a rich dad is a detriment - (boxley) - (11)
                                         What do you call having a poor dad then? - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                             s/few years/rest of your life - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                                 I said a nice place :-P - (ben_tilly)
                                             whenever someone takes 1/2 of mine it gets detrimental - (boxley) - (1)
                                                 It wasn't yours - (ben_tilly)
                                         Please provide verifiable references . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                                             :-) - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 Yeah, we had that in my family too. - (Andrew Grygus)
                                             Andrew Jackson's Grandchildren - (boxley) - (2)
                                                 Eh? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                     When I was at the Hermitage I saw info that had the begats - (boxley)
                                 Its a tax on *personal* wealth - (tuberculosis) - (4)
                                     Small set of victims is larger than the set your after. - (bepatient) - (3)
                                         s /surf/serf/ "Surf's up at Wal-Mart!" :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                         I disagree on how good it is - (ben_tilly)
                                         not if you measure in dollars - (tuberculosis)
                             Look at it from the child's point of view - (ben_tilly) - (27)
                                 Difference is, when you get that income - (bepatient) - (19)
                                     So I don't keep the house, big deal. - (ben_tilly)
                                     Easy - (JayMehaffey) - (17)
                                         Since you've never had this happen to someone you know - (bepatient) - (16)
                                             Compromise suggested - (ben_tilly)
                                             Don't know about New Jersey - (JayMehaffey) - (4)
                                                 Selling part of a farm - (imric)
                                                 Lovely use of statistics - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                     Figures where for 2000, current rate is lower. - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                                                         Re: Figures where for 2000, current rate is lower. - (bepatient)
                                             Latest numbers and info from the IRS. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 Estate tax level is current wacky - (JayMehaffey)
                                             Re: Since you've never had this happen to someone you know - (tuberculosis) - (7)
                                                 Try.. - (bepatient) - (6)
                                                     Nota bene - (jake123)
                                                     All true, but that's a different problem - (drewk)
                                                     Mortgage or move - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                                                         Interesting take - (bepatient) - (2)
                                                             So take Ben's solution. - (inthane-chan)
                                                             I have no intention - (tuberculosis)
                                 why should you have to pay %50 taxes because your - (boxley) - (1)
                                     simple, your parents had more money...that makes it fair. -NT - (bepatient)
                                 Does your father(s estate) get to write off the expense? - (drewk) - (4)
                                     I know someone who did it. - (broomberg) - (2)
                                         I know multiple people who've done that - (ben_tilly)
                                         That's a little different, as I understand it. - (Another Scott)
                                     Its called a living trust came into being with the ERISA law -NT - (boxley)
             This tax was deliberately confiscatory when introduced. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                 I'd agree with that -NT - (ben_tilly)
                 She's got vast... tracts of land. -NT - (jake123)
         This surprises you? -NT - (tuberculosis)

I didn't tell you that it was good! I told you that it was interesting.
151 ms