IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Edited.
Don't have a board with me, so I can't double check.
Collapse Edited by inthane-chan April 27, 2006, 10:35:36 PM EDT
Same final move for white leads to same result IIRC.
Don't have a board with me, so I can't double check.
New Yup, please edit that subject line though.
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
     Mate in 2. - (ben_tilly) - (17)
         dunno the issue, whites move? - (boxley) - (10)
             The issue is finding mate in 2 - (ben_tilly) - (9)
                 well if - (boxley) - (8)
                     You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                         Re: You are taking more than 2 moves to win. - (dws) - (6)
                             Let's put that in algebraic notation... - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                                 Intentially vague - (dws) - (4)
                                     I'll hide my response to that in an edit then... - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                         Mixing notations... - (dws) - (2)
                                             Response in last edit -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                             Dammit - (drewk)
         Nevermind. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
             Remember to show the entire finish, not just one move -NT - (ben_tilly)
         Re: Mate in 2. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3)
             Complete solution? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                 Edited. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                     Yup, please edit that subject line though. -NT - (ben_tilly)

Batches? BATCHES?? We don't need no steenkin' batches!
127 ms