Sure, I would be surprised if they didn't think about it, but since AOL currently owns Netscape, then the term Browser Monopoly would have a nice threatening ring to it...
Wade.
Re-opening the Possible Remedies argument.
- (static)
- (21)
- July 19, 2001, 09:19:47 PM EDT
Heh.
- (admin)
- (3)
- July 19, 2001, 09:46:21 PM EDT
AOL.
-NT
- (imric)
- (2)
- July 19, 2001, 09:53:08 PM EDT
I bloody well hope not!
- (inthane-chan)
- (1)
- July 20, 2001, 12:20:49 AM EDT
I doubt they would.
- (static)
- July 21, 2001, 01:36:15 AM EDT
To what end? Dave touches on this, but...
- (Another Scott)
- (16)
- July 20, 2001, 07:26:28 AM EDT
In order to restore competition...
- (Don)
- (10)
- July 20, 2001, 01:22:04 PM EDT
I think we should nuke them from orbit. It's the only way...
- (jake123)
- (1)
- July 20, 2001, 01:35:41 PM EDT
I said that.
-NT
- (Ashton)
- July 21, 2001, 12:02:19 AM EDT
Can't do that.
- (addison)
- (7)
- July 20, 2001, 03:02:43 PM EDT
Why not?
- (Don)
- (6)
- July 21, 2001, 03:08:47 AM EDT
Because its illegal?
- (addison)
- (5)
- July 21, 2001, 01:42:49 PM EDT
which part is "illegal"?
- (Don)
- (3)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 04:47:44 AM EDT
Most of it.
- (addison)
- (2)
- Aug. 1, 2001, 10:35:36 AM EDT
Perhaps all these points underscore the need for
- (Ashton)
- Aug. 2, 2001, 06:11:11 PM EDT
You keep missing the point re: linux
- (Don)
- Aug. 2, 2001, 07:37:58 PM EDT
Info : Excerpt from IE's "About" Box
- (pwhysall)
- Aug. 3, 2001, 02:53:18 AM EDT
It's a risky move, undoubtedly.
- (static)
- (4)
- July 21, 2001, 01:56:45 AM EDT
Agree, and Disagree
- (jb4)
- (3)
- July 24, 2001, 02:09:54 PM EDT
Trying to do that creates a bigger problem.
- (static)
- (1)
- July 25, 2001, 11:04:44 PM EDT
We've heard many suggestions re the dilemma by now.
- (Ashton)
- July 25, 2001, 11:32:29 PM EDT
Trying to do that creates a bigger problem.
- (static)
- July 25, 2001, 11:04:44 PM EDT