Re: Now you're just being thick

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #246,125 by pwhysall 2/25/06 12:04:03 AM Reply	Re: Now you're just being thick Sorry if this sounds boringly condescending. Yes...well it is consistent with what one would expect in your posts. Oh, fuck off. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #246,267 by jb4 2/27/06 1:29:30 PM Reply	Oh, did you get your widdy biddy fewings hurt? So, it's ok for you to be a smug smartass, but when somebody brings it back atcha, you get all huffy? Baby, baby, baby! jb4 "Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'." &mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
Post #246,282 by pwhysall 2/27/06 4:20:44 PM Reply	Not really. You were being a raving dipshit, and I got tired of it. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!

ID Card bill passed in the Commons. - (pwhysall) - (40) - Feb. 14, 2006, 07:29:58 AM EST

Excellent letter. I hope he sees it and takes it to heart. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 14, 2006, 08:43:07 AM EST

The saddest aspect is - (Ashton) - Feb. 15, 2006, 05:39:14 AM EST

Your question is rhetorical, but the answer is: - (jb4) - Feb. 15, 2006, 10:45:08 AM EST

Letter to Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (36) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:42:03 PM EST

Any time to do the transcription? Also IEEE Spectrum. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 19, 2006, 01:10:07 PM EST

Reply from Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (31) - Feb. 22, 2006, 02:58:27 PM EST

...the FRACK? - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:01:10 PM EST

What a fscking MORON! - (jb4) - (16) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:12:41 PM EST

He's not a moron, that's the problem. - (pwhysall) - (15) - Feb. 23, 2006, 01:40:48 PM EST

OK, let me rephrase that, then... - (jb4) - (14) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:10:14 PM EST

That's bollocks, too. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:45:07 PM EST

Prolly doesn't get some of the finer points of parliamentary - (jake123) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 04:55:22 PM EST

Thanks for the primer on the finer points of ... - (jb4) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:34:53 PM EST

He's a good MP... - (jb4) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:30:28 PM EST

You're all excitable, aren't you? - (pwhysall) - (9) - Feb. 23, 2006, 06:04:01 PM EST

Heheh. - (imric) - Feb. 23, 2006, 07:48:48 PM EST

Not a moron. Just another whore. Same as ours. - (hnick) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2006, 07:52:12 PM EST

To answer your question ... - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 07:58:10 PM EST

Nah... Not enough room. - (hnick) - Feb. 23, 2006, 08:18:14 PM EST

On second thought... - (hnick) - Feb. 23, 2006, 08:49:18 PM EST

Now you're just being thick - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2006, 01:15:43 PM EST

Re: Now you're just being thick - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2006, 12:04:03 AM EST

Oh, did you get your widdy biddy fewings hurt? - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2006, 01:29:30 PM EST

Not really. - (pwhysall) - Feb. 27, 2006, 04:20:44 PM EST

In other words, he's not open to contrary evidence. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:14:53 PM EST

I've already had a really good fume about this. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:40:07 PM EST

I'd smack him upside the haid (verbally, of course)... - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:57:51 PM EST

I'm going to compose a measured response. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:00:09 PM EST

You must admit, though, it would be rather cathartic. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:04:40 PM EST

Write it, but don't mail it. - (jbrabeck) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:14:59 PM EST

Re: Reply from Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (6) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:59:53 PM EST

Very well stated. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (5) - Feb. 22, 2006, 05:13:37 PM EST

Agreed...Very well stated. However... - (jb4) - (4) - Feb. 23, 2006, 10:20:55 AM EST

"Transparent Society" ... philosophical question - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2006, 10:31:34 AM EST

Exactly what he says. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:19:48 AM EST

To me, that's not the same - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:22:49 AM EST

Who watches the watchmen? - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:59:04 AM EST

Send the moron this - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:46:58 AM EDT

Link doesn't work -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2006, 12:05:39 AM EST

'Cellphone could crack RFID tags, says cryptographer' - (Ashton) - Feb. 25, 2006, 03:46:41 AM EST

Can those of you in the back hear me?
142 ms