IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Now you're just being thick
I can guarantee you that if I write to him and call him names, he'll write back saying "thank you for your letter" and that'll be the end of the dialogue.
I wouldn't write him and call him names, and if you read carefully (at least, more carefully that you apparently have), I've been advocating all along that he be written to solicit for an apology for quite clearly stating that people who don't agree with his scripted dronings in this area are criminals. If it ever got down to a face-to-face, and he were to refuse to apologize, then (and only then) might some thunder need to be invoked.
[...] that may be the way American politics is conducted, but we do things slightly differently over here.
Yes, you blokes seem to prefer shouting back and forth across the aisle at one another...
And you really need to understand how a party whip works in a parliamentary democracy before diving in feet first;[...]
See [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=245969|this post] for my response to jake123's attempts to enlighten me.
Sorry if this sounds boringly condescending.
Yes...well it is consistent with what one would expect in your posts.
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
New Re: Now you're just being thick
Sorry if this sounds boringly condescending.
Yes...well it is consistent with what one would expect in your posts.

Oh, fuck off.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Oh, did you get your widdy biddy fewings hurt?
So, it's ok for you to be a smug smartass, but when somebody brings it back atcha, you get all huffy?

Baby, baby, baby!
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
New Not really.
You were being a raving dipshit, and I got tired of it.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
     ID Card bill passed in the Commons. - (pwhysall) - (40)
         Excellent letter. I hope he sees it and takes it to heart. -NT - (Another Scott)
         The saddest aspect is - (Ashton)
         Your question is rhetorical, but the answer is: - (jb4)
         Letter to Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (36)
             Any time to do the transcription? Also IEEE Spectrum. - (Another Scott)
             Reply from Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (31)
                 ...the FRACK? - (inthane-chan)
                 What a fscking MORON! - (jb4) - (16)
                     He's not a moron, that's the problem. - (pwhysall) - (15)
                         OK, let me rephrase that, then... - (jb4) - (14)
                             That's bollocks, too. - (pwhysall) - (13)
                                 Prolly doesn't get some of the finer points of parliamentary - (jake123) - (1)
                                     Thanks for the primer on the finer points of ... - (jb4)
                                 He's a good MP... - (jb4) - (10)
                                     You're all excitable, aren't you? - (pwhysall) - (9)
                                         Heheh. - (imric)
                                         Not a moron. Just another whore. Same as ours. - (hnick) - (3)
                                             To answer your question ... - (drewk) - (1)
                                                 Nah... Not enough room. - (hnick)
                                             On second thought... - (hnick)
                                         Now you're just being thick - (jb4) - (3)
                                             Re: Now you're just being thick - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                                 Oh, did you get your widdy biddy fewings hurt? - (jb4) - (1)
                                                     Not really. - (pwhysall)
                 In other words, he's not open to contrary evidence. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     I've already had a really good fume about this. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4)
                         I'd smack him upside the haid (verbally, of course)... - (jb4) - (3)
                             I'm going to compose a measured response. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                 You must admit, though, it would be rather cathartic. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                     Write it, but don't mail it. - (jbrabeck)
                 Re: Reply from Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (6)
                     Very well stated. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (5)
                         Agreed...Very well stated. However... - (jb4) - (4)
                             "Transparent Society" ... philosophical question - (drewk) - (3)
                                 Exactly what he says. - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                                     To me, that's not the same - (drewk) - (1)
                                         Who watches the watchmen? - (inthane-chan)
             Send the moron this - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                 Link doesn't work -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     'Cellphone could crack RFID tags, says cryptographer' - (Ashton)

Stop obsessing about collecting All Kinds of Stupid Crap.
52 ms