I've already had a really good fume about this.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #245,785 by pwhysall 2/22/06 3:40:07 PM Reply	I've already had a really good fume about this. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #245,789 by jb4 2/22/06 3:57:51 PM Reply	I'd smack him upside the haid (verbally, of course)... About the "law abiding citizen has nothing to fear" bullshit. He's effectively called you a criminal, Peter, and I, for one, would not take such an affront from my non-Diebold-elected official without some serious fireworks, and a direct, face-to-face apology! jb4 "Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'." &mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
Post #245,791 by pwhysall 2/22/06 4:00:09 PM Reply	I'm going to compose a measured response. If I reply now, I'll be rude, and that won't help. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #245,792 by inthane-chan 2/22/06 4:04:40 PM Reply	You must admit, though, it would be rather cathartic. It might be worth writing the pissy response now just to get it out of your system. When somebody asks you to trade your freedoms for security, it isn't your* security they're talking about.*
Post #245,793 by jbrabeck 2/22/06 4:14:59 PM Reply	Write it, but don't mail it. Write well thought out response later. A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"

ID Card bill passed in the Commons. - (pwhysall) - (40) - Feb. 14, 2006, 07:29:58 AM EST

Excellent letter. I hope he sees it and takes it to heart. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 14, 2006, 08:43:07 AM EST

The saddest aspect is - (Ashton) - Feb. 15, 2006, 05:39:14 AM EST

Your question is rhetorical, but the answer is: - (jb4) - Feb. 15, 2006, 10:45:08 AM EST

Letter to Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (36) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:42:03 PM EST

Any time to do the transcription? Also IEEE Spectrum. - (Another Scott) - Feb. 19, 2006, 01:10:07 PM EST

Reply from Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (31) - Feb. 22, 2006, 02:58:27 PM EST

...the FRACK? - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:01:10 PM EST

What a fscking MORON! - (jb4) - (16) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:12:41 PM EST

He's not a moron, that's the problem. - (pwhysall) - (15) - Feb. 23, 2006, 01:40:48 PM EST

OK, let me rephrase that, then... - (jb4) - (14) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:10:14 PM EST

That's bollocks, too. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Feb. 23, 2006, 02:45:07 PM EST

Prolly doesn't get some of the finer points of parliamentary - (jake123) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 04:55:22 PM EST

Thanks for the primer on the finer points of ... - (jb4) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:34:53 PM EST

He's a good MP... - (jb4) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2006, 05:30:28 PM EST

You're all excitable, aren't you? - (pwhysall) - (9) - Feb. 23, 2006, 06:04:01 PM EST

Heheh. - (imric) - Feb. 23, 2006, 07:48:48 PM EST

Not a moron. Just another whore. Same as ours. - (hnick) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2006, 07:52:12 PM EST

To answer your question ... - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 07:58:10 PM EST

Nah... Not enough room. - (hnick) - Feb. 23, 2006, 08:18:14 PM EST

On second thought... - (hnick) - Feb. 23, 2006, 08:49:18 PM EST

Now you're just being thick - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2006, 01:15:43 PM EST

Re: Now you're just being thick - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2006, 12:04:03 AM EST

Oh, did you get your widdy biddy fewings hurt? - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2006, 01:29:30 PM EST

Not really. - (pwhysall) - Feb. 27, 2006, 04:20:44 PM EST

In other words, he's not open to contrary evidence. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:14:53 PM EST

I've already had a really good fume about this. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:40:07 PM EST

I'd smack him upside the haid (verbally, of course)... - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 22, 2006, 03:57:51 PM EST

I'm going to compose a measured response. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:00:09 PM EST

You must admit, though, it would be rather cathartic. - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:04:40 PM EST

Write it, but don't mail it. - (jbrabeck) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:14:59 PM EST

Re: Reply from Ashok Kumar, MP - (pwhysall) - (6) - Feb. 22, 2006, 04:59:53 PM EST

Very well stated. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (5) - Feb. 22, 2006, 05:13:37 PM EST

Agreed...Very well stated. However... - (jb4) - (4) - Feb. 23, 2006, 10:20:55 AM EST

"Transparent Society" ... philosophical question - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2006, 10:31:34 AM EST

Exactly what he says. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:19:48 AM EST

To me, that's not the same - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:22:49 AM EST

Who watches the watchmen? - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 23, 2006, 11:59:04 AM EST

Send the moron this - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:46:58 AM EDT

Link doesn't work -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2006, 12:05:39 AM EST

'Cellphone could crack RFID tags, says cryptographer' - (Ashton) - Feb. 25, 2006, 03:46:41 AM EST

iwethey.org

DON'T PANIC
53 ms