IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sorry to subvert your boycott . . .
. . but I view trolls like Marshmarlowe as light hearted entertainment - to be ignored if you please or to poke a stick at when you please. For sure if he responds he'll be working a lot harder than I did.

Unlike some here I just don't feel compelled to read every post or even every topic so I have no problem ignoring trolls when I'm not in the mood.

Should Michel Merlin have been disciplined? I'm not sure, but being banned was exactly what he was trying to achieve so even a short disciplinary "time out" played right into the hands of his warped ego - and the board's been a little duller for that.

I have to admit, though, that I get almost as much entertainment from they who take the trolls too seriously as I do from the trolls themselves.

This stuff just doesn't need to be take so seriously - like life itself shouldn't be taken too seriously - it ain't like it were permanent, you know.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New And to amplify on that
On the "poking with a stick" part...It does tend to break up the day, and often provides some much-needed stress relief.

And besides, he's such a fuckin' berk...!
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
     The State of the Parties - (marlowe) - (27)
         Fine, you've pissed on the post this month... - (rcareaga)
         so when is bush and osama going to give it back? - (boxley)
         Was it reallythat bad that you needed this many words . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
             The drive-by troll gains yet more responses - (Silverlock) - (2)
                 Sorry to subvert your boycott . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                     And to amplify on that - (jb4)
         It's bad alright. America is really in trouble. - (jake123)
         How many times? - (pwhysall) - (19)
             Then I must be left wing... -NT - (jbrabeck)
             so the doctors work for free, the buildings get built free - (boxley) - (1)
                 'Free at the point of delivery' means funded by tax -NT - (warmachine)
             The sad thing is that... - (ben_tilly) - (15)
                 Then there's what they *don't* support - (drewk) - (14)
                     I know - (ben_tilly)
                     another question on government run health care - (boxley) - (12)
                         I would like the same treatment that Congress gets - (ben_tilly) - (11)
                             no question about the quality but the quantity sux - (boxley) - (10)
                                 Average wait times in the US are as long -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                     Yeah, but you get cable TV in the room -NT - (pwhysall)
                                 Wait times even longer in US if you have no $$ - (jb4) - (7)
                                     everyone with a torn hangnail goes to the emergency - (boxley) - (6)
                                         Universal, tax funded health care sounds like a good thing. - (Silverlock) - (5)
                                             It really depends on how it's done. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                 Answer to your (rhetorical) question: - (jb4) - (1)
                                                     ICLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott)
                                                 Re: It really depends on how it's done. - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                                                     I still think the first step - (Simon_Jester)

Non-migratory, just like cocopabanana blaps.
46 ms