warrantless searches? At least twice since Nixon - (boxley) - (51) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:18:43 AM EST
         Your point? - (jb4) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:37:59 AM EST
             s/terrierists/intelligence/g -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:44:38 AM EST
                 Uhh...Box? Those words are not interchangeable - (jb4) - (3) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:46:48 AM EST
                     spying to the detriment of the American body - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:01:34 PM EST
                         Rather depends on whose doing it, doncha think? - (jb4) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:16:25 PM EST
                             ICLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:18:43 PM EST
         C'mon Bill - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:52:40 AM EST
             It is different. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:26:01 PM EST
                 You just keep teling yourself that - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:32:26 PM EST
                     No. My fear is that they won't. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 21, 2005, 02:05:26 PM EST
             Actually, I'd noticed they were gone... - (jb4) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:17:47 PM EST
                 First traffic stop in new jersey - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:20:05 PM EST
                 much earlier, after august 1st 1966, things were slipping - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:44:44 PM EST
         Of U. S citizens? - (Silverlock) - (35) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:49:24 PM EST
             How very quaint - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:53:47 PM EST
                 Which stuff? -NT - (drewk) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:13:09 PM EST
                     They seem to be of the opinion - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:05:40 PM EST
                         Thanks for telling me what I think - (Silverlock) - (3) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:20:09 PM EST
                             So you then will state... - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:22:03 PM EST
                                 Sure they're doing something new. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:24:19 PM EST
                                     More brazen - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:33:11 PM EST
             Don't bother them with facts.... - (Simon_Jester) - (26) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:56:18 PM EST
                 And you trust this information? - (bepatient) - (25) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:08:48 PM EST
                     Only 900? Piker! - (jb4) - (22) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:22:08 PM EST
                         Hoover? - (bepatient) - (21) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:30:18 PM EST
                             But of course that makes it OK in your world. - (jb4) - (20) - Dec. 21, 2005, 04:56:28 PM EST
                                 He didn't say it isn't bad, he said it isn't new -NT - (drewk) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:01:35 PM EST
                                 Cuz uf cours if ya ain't with us yer agin us. - (imric) - (9) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:09:09 PM EST
                                     Not what bothers me - (drewk) - (8) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:25:12 PM EST
                                         nit: Cincinnati. An Ohioan should know that. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (7) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:29:40 PM EST
                                             What's that have to do with me? -NT - (drewk) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:42:41 PM EST
                                                 [Whoosh.] - (Another Scott) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:49:42 PM EST
                                                     No, you're not missing anything, I'm being a prick - (drewk) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:57:53 PM EST
                                                         You fit right in then. __________________________________:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:00:35 PM EST
                                                         HE moved there deliberately... <snicker> -NT - (hnick) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:03:30 PM EST
                                                             The f*** I did - (drewk) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:07:39 PM EST
                                                                 Sure, blame the wife -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:14:25 PM EST
                                 No...not even - (bepatient) - (8) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:03:05 PM EST
                                     I don't think that's quite accurate - (Silverlock) - Dec. 22, 2005, 09:36:49 AM EST
                                     The incredulity is deserved - (jb4) - (5) - Dec. 22, 2005, 01:28:11 PM EST
                                         Only if Hilary or Condi win. -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Dec. 22, 2005, 01:35:01 PM EST
                                             s/Hillary or Condi win/Grace Park wins -NT - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 22, 2005, 02:09:53 PM EST
                                         I remember it being phrased a bit differently - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 22, 2005, 03:36:04 PM EST
                                             s/Jimmy/Ike/ -NT - (hnick) - (1) - Dec. 22, 2005, 04:34:29 PM EST
                                                 Yeah, ok. Probably true. -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 22, 2005, 06:26:17 PM EST
                                     Well, while we're cherry picking scurrilities - (Ashton) - Dec. 23, 2005, 03:25:26 AM EST
                     Correct me if I am wrong.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 07:21:04 PM EST
                         remember to vote dem in the midterms - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 07:41:55 PM EST
             thanks for the update, retract statement since Nixon -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:03:03 PM EST
         Here's a cartoon that about sums it up. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 23, 2005, 03:16:40 PM EST
             JOT - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 23, 2005, 04:01:37 PM EST