They seem to be of the opinion

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #238,804 by bepatient 12/21/05 3:05:40 PM Reply	They seem to be of the opinion that this is the first administration to "spy" on its own citizens to protect national security. At least, thats what it sounds like...that while this administration actually >wrote it down< that somehow other administrations didn't maintain files on or monitor communications between citizens without a valid warrant. Maybe I should just be happy that some folks acually have that much faith in the fed. Personally I simply think it naive to believe that this is the first instance of this occuring (written down or not) If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #238,814 by Silverlock 12/21/05 3:20:09 PM Reply	Thanks for telling me what I think And here I thought I was just pointing out an obvious twisting of the truth from Drudge. Looking back at my post, I wonder where you got the idea I was saying anything other than that. ----------------------------------------- No new taxes. --George H. W. Bush We don't torture. --George W. Bush
Post #238,815 by bepatient 12/21/05 3:22:03 PM Reply	So you then will state... ...that what this administration is doing is nothing new? Or are you simply content to contradict Matt? Thats fine with me too. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #238,818 by Silverlock 12/21/05 3:24:19 PM Reply	Sure they're doing something new. Getting caught. ----------------------------------------- No new taxes. --George H. W. Bush We don't torture. --George W. Bush
Post #238,823 by bepatient 12/21/05 3:33:11 PM Reply	More brazen "Yeah we did it. So what?". Willing to venture that most of the US (those poor, downtrodden masses) actually agree with the "so what" statement too. Extreme measures taken during extreme circumstances and all that. All in all its just..another brick in the wall. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

warrantless searches? At least twice since Nixon - (boxley) - (51) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:18:43 AM EST

Your point? - (jb4) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:37:59 AM EST

s/terrierists/intelligence/g -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:44:38 AM EST

Uhh...Box? Those words are not interchangeable - (jb4) - (3) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:46:48 AM EST

spying to the detriment of the American body - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:01:34 PM EST

Rather depends on whose doing it, doncha think? - (jb4) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:16:25 PM EST

ICLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:18:43 PM EST

C'mon Bill - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:52:40 AM EST

It is different. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:26:01 PM EST

You just keep teling yourself that - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:32:26 PM EST

No. My fear is that they won't. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 21, 2005, 02:05:26 PM EST

Actually, I'd noticed they were gone... - (jb4) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:17:47 PM EST

First traffic stop in new jersey - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:20:05 PM EST

much earlier, after august 1st 1966, things were slipping - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:44:44 PM EST

Of U. S citizens? - (Silverlock) - (35) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:49:24 PM EST

How very quaint - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:53:47 PM EST

Which stuff? -NT - (drewk) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:13:09 PM EST

They seem to be of the opinion - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:05:40 PM EST

Thanks for telling me what I think - (Silverlock) - (3) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:20:09 PM EST

So you then will state... - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:22:03 PM EST

Sure they're doing something new. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:24:19 PM EST

More brazen - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:33:11 PM EST

Don't bother them with facts.... - (Simon_Jester) - (26) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:56:18 PM EST

And you trust this information? - (bepatient) - (25) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:08:48 PM EST

Only 900? Piker! - (jb4) - (22) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:22:08 PM EST

Hoover? - (bepatient) - (21) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:30:18 PM EST

But of course that makes it OK in your world. - (jb4) - (20) - Dec. 21, 2005, 04:56:28 PM EST

He didn't say it isn't bad, he said it isn't new -NT - (drewk) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:01:35 PM EST

Cuz uf cours if ya ain't with us yer agin us. - (imric) - (9) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:09:09 PM EST

Not what bothers me - (drewk) - (8) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:25:12 PM EST

nit: Cincinnati. An Ohioan should know that. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (7) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:29:40 PM EST

What's that have to do with me? -NT - (drewk) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:42:41 PM EST

[Whoosh.] - (Another Scott) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:49:42 PM EST

No, you're not missing anything, I'm being a prick - (drewk) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:57:53 PM EST

You fit right in then. __________________________________:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:00:35 PM EST

HE moved there deliberately... <snicker> -NT - (hnick) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:03:30 PM EST

The f*** I did - (drewk) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:07:39 PM EST

Sure, blame the wife -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:14:25 PM EST

No...not even - (bepatient) - (8) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:03:05 PM EST

I don't think that's quite accurate - (Silverlock) - Dec. 22, 2005, 09:36:49 AM EST

The incredulity is deserved - (jb4) - (5) - Dec. 22, 2005, 01:28:11 PM EST

Only if Hilary or Condi win. -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Dec. 22, 2005, 01:35:01 PM EST

s/Hillary or Condi win/Grace Park wins -NT - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 22, 2005, 02:09:53 PM EST

I remember it being phrased a bit differently - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 22, 2005, 03:36:04 PM EST

s/Jimmy/Ike/ -NT - (hnick) - (1) - Dec. 22, 2005, 04:34:29 PM EST

Yeah, ok. Probably true. -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 22, 2005, 06:26:17 PM EST

Well, while we're cherry picking scurrilities - (Ashton) - Dec. 23, 2005, 03:25:26 AM EST

Correct me if I am wrong.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 07:21:04 PM EST

remember to vote dem in the midterms - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 07:41:55 PM EST

thanks for the update, retract statement since Nixon -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:03:03 PM EST

Here's a cartoon that about sums it up. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 23, 2005, 03:16:40 PM EST

JOT - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 23, 2005, 04:01:37 PM EST

Windows - nice body, scrambled brains. It's Jennifer Aniston!
214 ms