Uhh...Box? Those words are not interchangeable

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #238,766 by jb4 12/21/05 11:46:48 AM Reply	Uhh...Box? Those words are not interchangeable Not even by the language hit-men this "administration" employs. jb4 shrub●bish (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT
Post #238,785 by boxley 12/21/05 1:01:34 PM Reply	spying to the detriment of the American body terrorizing to the detriment of the American body, which one is worse for us? thanx, bill "the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #238,809 by jb4 12/21/05 3:16:25 PM Reply	Rather depends on whose doing it, doncha think? In any case, ain't neither one good. But in the choice between "enemies, foreign and domestic", I'd prefer my enemies foreign; I'd rather they not be constitutional officers. jb4 shrub●bish (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT
Post #238,812 by Another Scott 12/21/05 3:18:43 PM Reply	ICLRPD. (new thread) Created as new thread #238811 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=238811\|ICLRPD.]

warrantless searches? At least twice since Nixon - (boxley) - (51) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:18:43 AM EST

Your point? - (jb4) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:37:59 AM EST

s/terrierists/intelligence/g -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:44:38 AM EST

Uhh...Box? Those words are not interchangeable - (jb4) - (3) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:46:48 AM EST

spying to the detriment of the American body - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:01:34 PM EST

Rather depends on whose doing it, doncha think? - (jb4) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:16:25 PM EST

ICLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:18:43 PM EST

C'mon Bill - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 11:52:40 AM EST

It is different. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:26:01 PM EST

You just keep teling yourself that - (bepatient) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:32:26 PM EST

No. My fear is that they won't. - (mmoffitt) - Dec. 21, 2005, 02:05:26 PM EST

Actually, I'd noticed they were gone... - (jb4) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:17:47 PM EST

First traffic stop in new jersey - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:20:05 PM EST

much earlier, after august 1st 1966, things were slipping - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:44:44 PM EST

Of U. S citizens? - (Silverlock) - (35) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:49:24 PM EST

How very quaint - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:53:47 PM EST

Which stuff? -NT - (drewk) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:13:09 PM EST

They seem to be of the opinion - (bepatient) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:05:40 PM EST

Thanks for telling me what I think - (Silverlock) - (3) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:20:09 PM EST

So you then will state... - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:22:03 PM EST

Sure they're doing something new. - (Silverlock) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:24:19 PM EST

More brazen - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:33:11 PM EST

Don't bother them with facts.... - (Simon_Jester) - (26) - Dec. 21, 2005, 12:56:18 PM EST

And you trust this information? - (bepatient) - (25) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:08:48 PM EST

Only 900? Piker! - (jb4) - (22) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:22:08 PM EST

Hoover? - (bepatient) - (21) - Dec. 21, 2005, 03:30:18 PM EST

But of course that makes it OK in your world. - (jb4) - (20) - Dec. 21, 2005, 04:56:28 PM EST

He didn't say it isn't bad, he said it isn't new -NT - (drewk) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:01:35 PM EST

Cuz uf cours if ya ain't with us yer agin us. - (imric) - (9) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:09:09 PM EST

Not what bothers me - (drewk) - (8) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:25:12 PM EST

nit: Cincinnati. An Ohioan should know that. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (7) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:29:40 PM EST

What's that have to do with me? -NT - (drewk) - (6) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:42:41 PM EST

[Whoosh.] - (Another Scott) - (5) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:49:42 PM EST

No, you're not missing anything, I'm being a prick - (drewk) - (4) - Dec. 21, 2005, 05:57:53 PM EST

You fit right in then. __________________________________:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:00:35 PM EST

HE moved there deliberately... <snicker> -NT - (hnick) - (2) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:03:30 PM EST

The f*** I did - (drewk) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:07:39 PM EST

Sure, blame the wife -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:14:25 PM EST

No...not even - (bepatient) - (8) - Dec. 21, 2005, 06:03:05 PM EST

I don't think that's quite accurate - (Silverlock) - Dec. 22, 2005, 09:36:49 AM EST

The incredulity is deserved - (jb4) - (5) - Dec. 22, 2005, 01:28:11 PM EST

Only if Hilary or Condi win. -NT - (jake123) - (1) - Dec. 22, 2005, 01:35:01 PM EST

s/Hillary or Condi win/Grace Park wins -NT - (inthane-chan) - Dec. 22, 2005, 02:09:53 PM EST

I remember it being phrased a bit differently - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 22, 2005, 03:36:04 PM EST

s/Jimmy/Ike/ -NT - (hnick) - (1) - Dec. 22, 2005, 04:34:29 PM EST

Yeah, ok. Probably true. -NT - (bepatient) - Dec. 22, 2005, 06:26:17 PM EST

Well, while we're cherry picking scurrilities - (Ashton) - Dec. 23, 2005, 03:25:26 AM EST

Correct me if I am wrong.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 21, 2005, 07:21:04 PM EST

remember to vote dem in the midterms - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 07:41:55 PM EST

thanks for the update, retract statement since Nixon -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 21, 2005, 01:03:03 PM EST

Here's a cartoon that about sums it up. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Dec. 23, 2005, 03:16:40 PM EST

JOT - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 23, 2005, 04:01:37 PM EST

iwethey.org

Connection reset by peer.
72 ms