Re: Ya gotta look at a version that's was released in this

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #236,317 by pwhysall 11/28/05 1:59:43 PM Reply	Re: Ya gotta look at a version that's was released in this I [link\|http://www.ecomstation.com/gallery/index.php?g=eComStation_1.2/user_submitted_screenshots\|did]. Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #236,321 by folkert 11/28/05 2:41:24 PM Reply	Wow. 4 out of the 6 are very nice looking. Those 4 look everybit as nice as KDE or GNOME does. One even surpasses them in subtle touches. Really, truly, there is no difference in the "look" of the Linux Desktop and the OS/2 eComStation. I am thinking there is an "OMG-Lookey-What-I-Can-Do" amount of options in configs... the last time I really used OS/2 was ONLY in commandline mode for controlling a tape-robot, a couple of tape storage Cabinets, and a gaggle of Tape Drives. I rather liked being able to just use it. The other two that were setup in "gaudy" mode, sure we can get there in Linux. Just try "twm" on for size. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* Freedom is not FREE. Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars? SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0; 0 rows returned.
Post #236,328 by pwhysall 11/28/05 4:02:11 PM Reply	I take it your wife chooses the decor in your house. You'd go blind, otherwise... Peter [link\|http://www.no2id.net/\|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!

Let's try it again then. - (ubernostrum) - (48) - Nov. 24, 2005, 09:13:04 AM EST

I don't think anyone disagrees with that. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Nov. 24, 2005, 09:50:42 AM EST

Re: I don't think anyone disagrees with that. - (ubernostrum) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2005, 02:34:24 AM EST

Sensible people don't want redundant configuration options. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:14:38 PM EST

Seriously. - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Nov. 29, 2005, 12:51:34 AM EST

Balkanization -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 29, 2005, 01:08:18 AM EST

Fine - (broomberg) - (42) - Nov. 24, 2005, 09:56:55 AM EST

Re: Fine - (ubernostrum) - (40) - Nov. 24, 2005, 11:30:59 AM EST

Simple example - (broomberg) - (16) - Nov. 24, 2005, 11:42:38 AM EST

Re: Simple example - (altmann) - (1) - Nov. 24, 2005, 04:16:18 PM EST

Hey - (broomberg) - Nov. 24, 2005, 04:34:58 PM EST

No. - (ubernostrum) - (13) - Nov. 30, 2005, 02:28:25 PM EST

Batch process. Automation. Piss off. -NT - (drewk) - (2) - Nov. 30, 2005, 03:40:11 PM EST

It's probably a database permissions problem. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 30, 2005, 03:47:25 PM EST

Now that twitch in my left eye is back -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 30, 2005, 03:48:25 PM EST

mickeysoft berk - (boxley) - Nov. 30, 2005, 05:27:04 PM EST

You've made it plain - (broomberg) - (8) - Dec. 1, 2005, 08:11:53 AM EST

You've made it plain - (ubernostrum) - (7) - Dec. 2, 2005, 12:24:39 AM EST

Reality check - (ben_tilly) - (6) - Dec. 2, 2005, 12:56:19 AM EST

The statement that highlights the fundamental disconnect - (bepatient) - (5) - Dec. 2, 2005, 09:30:19 AM EST

Devil's advocate mode - (broomberg) - (4) - Dec. 2, 2005, 08:52:21 PM EST

You CAN always leave means to override the default behaviour - (hnick) - (3) - Dec. 3, 2005, 08:33:40 AM EST

No, it can be very complicated - (tonytib) - (2) - Dec. 4, 2005, 12:43:16 AM EST

That's true. - (hnick) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2005, 08:10:02 AM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - Dec. 4, 2005, 02:20:13 PM EST

On its face - (bepatient) - (22) - Nov. 24, 2005, 12:53:13 PM EST

I use Excel daily. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Nov. 24, 2005, 02:10:10 PM EST

And why can't you do sparkle text *and* marching ants? -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 24, 2005, 02:11:35 PM EST

That could mean Excel is a flawed example. - (static) - (1) - Nov. 24, 2005, 06:59:24 PM EST

Number *format*. - (pwhysall) - Nov. 25, 2005, 01:26:46 AM EST

you poor bastard -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 24, 2005, 09:51:56 PM EST

Thanks for that link. Nostalgia! - (Another Scott) - Nov. 24, 2005, 02:38:43 PM EST

Re: On its face - (ubernostrum) - (15) - Nov. 28, 2005, 02:18:13 AM EST

Quick question for you - (ben_tilly) - (14) - Nov. 28, 2005, 02:25:18 AM EST

I do not believe - (ubernostrum) - (13) - Nov. 28, 2005, 02:49:45 AM EST

Before anyone else responds to this ... - (drewk) - Nov. 28, 2005, 09:39:39 AM EST

Too Late, Drook. - (jake123) - (11) - Nov. 28, 2005, 11:55:17 AM EST

Ya gotta admit, it /is/ arse-ugly, though. - (pwhysall) - (10) - Nov. 28, 2005, 12:05:49 PM EST

Ya looking in the mirror again? ;-) -NT - (jbrabeck) - (3) - Nov. 28, 2005, 12:14:50 PM EST

I see many things in the mirror. OS/2 isn't one of them. -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2005, 12:25:00 PM EST

And *I'm* the one that gets accused of fishing for LRPDs -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 28, 2005, 12:32:55 PM EST

That's because it isn't behind you -NT - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 28, 2005, 05:02:56 PM EST

Ya gotta look at a version that's was released in this - (jake123) - (5) - Nov. 28, 2005, 01:39:46 PM EST

Re: Ya gotta look at a version that's was released in this - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 28, 2005, 01:59:43 PM EST

Wow. 4 out of the 6 are very nice looking. - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2005, 02:41:24 PM EST

I take it your wife chooses the decor in your house. - (pwhysall) - Nov. 28, 2005, 04:02:11 PM EST

Jack, it' like trying to teach a pig to sing. -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Nov. 28, 2005, 06:16:32 PM EST

you've heard him, he cant sing :-) -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 28, 2005, 08:11:48 PM EST

Thanks, Barry, now I don't have to write that same post -NT - (drewk) - Nov. 24, 2005, 02:10:27 PM EST

iwethey.org

That would make a great .sig!
146 ms