No, it works as it's on the net

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #235,675

by jake123

11/23/05 11:40:41 AM

No, it works as it's on the net

so it is published, at least for the purposes of this course. Might be different for some other courses, but this in this one we're given a pretty long leash.

Anyhoo, the presentation on it is in three hours, so I gotta go. Thanks.

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's as good as anywhere, questioning Metcalfe's Law - (ben_tilly) - (30) - March 3, 2005, 01:38:39 AM EST

I stopped at the point where - (Arkadiy) - (15) - March 3, 2005, 09:48:43 AM EST

He's not saying what you think - (ben_tilly) - (14) - March 3, 2005, 10:54:49 AM EST

At least two of his examples are wrong - (Arkadiy) - (13) - March 3, 2005, 12:05:32 PM EST

Disagreement - (ben_tilly) - (12) - March 3, 2005, 01:57:45 PM EST

One counter-example, and a possible new POV - (drewk) - (3) - March 3, 2005, 09:11:41 PM EST

That's not entirely a counterexample - (ben_tilly) - (2) - March 4, 2005, 02:48:17 PM EST

You got the analogy, but missed the point - (drewk) - (1) - March 4, 2005, 03:27:51 PM EST

Chicken and egg on value - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:06:43 AM EST

OK, I finished reading - (Arkadiy) - (7) - March 4, 2005, 02:48:53 PM EST

If n^2 holds for users... - (ben_tilly) - (6) - March 4, 2005, 02:52:36 PM EST

Switching is not same as joining - (Arkadiy) - (5) - March 4, 2005, 03:37:26 PM EST

Larger by 30% wins? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - March 7, 2005, 04:21:04 AM EST

I guess I should re-read - (Arkadiy) - (1) - March 7, 2005, 09:26:01 AM EST

Read section 4 - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 11:23:39 AM EST

There's your example :-) - (drewk) - (1) - March 7, 2005, 12:26:44 PM EST

More valuable to you, yes - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 12:57:30 PM EST

I have come to the conclusion... - (folkert) - March 3, 2005, 11:18:45 AM EST

Re: Paper. - (a6l6e6x) - March 3, 2005, 10:48:07 PM EST

Something else I just realized - (drewk) - March 4, 2005, 12:03:27 AM EST

The mathematics is interesting and I presume . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - March 4, 2005, 01:14:02 AM EST

Mostly true - (ben_tilly) - (6) - March 4, 2005, 02:50:50 PM EST

Andrew's obviously talking B2B - (drewk) - (3) - March 4, 2005, 03:07:47 PM EST

My very favorite was a B to C - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 4, 2005, 06:08:19 PM EST

Oops! -NT - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:27:27 AM EST

I don't know the breakdown... - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:26:36 AM EST

But it isn't exactly frictionless . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 4, 2005, 05:50:13 PM EST

True but... - (ben_tilly) - March 7, 2005, 04:23:25 AM EST

Ben, do you mind if I cite this for a paper? - (jake123) - (2) - Nov. 22, 2005, 11:29:44 AM EST

You can cite this, if unpublished papers are acceptable - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Nov. 22, 2005, 10:20:54 PM EST

No, it works as it's on the net - (jake123) - Nov. 23, 2005, 11:40:41 AM EST

iwethey.org

Ph34r the triple-recursive meta-LRPD.
40 ms