Second hand smoke - (andread) - (14) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:42:07 PM EST
         I suspect common old Junk Stats, too - (Ashton) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:17:05 AM EST
         It's a difficult topic - (pwhysall) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 02:39:31 AM EST
             of course second hand smoke is bad for you - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:55:25 AM EST
                 There are those who claim it's harmless, albeit stinky. -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:45:30 PM EST
                     depends on your definition of harmless I suppose - (boxley) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:47:55 PM EST
         Some links. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:03:19 AM EST
             Re: Some links. - (andread) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 04:52:29 PM EST
                 Because it's socially acceptable to demonize smokers - (jake123) - (3) - Nov. 17, 2005, 12:00:08 PM EST
                     I was sorta with you until depleted uranium. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 17, 2005, 03:27:14 PM EST
                         There's always the danger - (imric) - Nov. 17, 2005, 03:33:41 PM EST
                         It's a risk to the profits of the rich people that make it. -NT - (jake123) - Nov. 17, 2005, 04:30:13 PM EST
         Re: second hand smoke - (imqwerky) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:23:55 AM EST
             Highly dangerous to dimes in precarious situations! -NT - (imric) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:48:33 AM EST
                 ;-) -NT - (imqwerky) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:42:04 PM EST