Because it's socially acceptable to demonize smokers

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #234,680

by jake123

11/17/05 12:00:08 PM

Because it's socially acceptable to demonize smokers

they are poor people for the most part after all, so it's OK, because we all know that poor people are poor due to their own shortcomings. Dissing those other things put rich people at risk, and we can't have that now can we.

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Post #234,723

by pwhysall

11/17/05 3:27:14 PM

I was sorta with you until depleted uranium.

How's that a risk for rich people?

Post #234,727

by imric

11/17/05 3:33:41 PM

There's always the danger

that the poor people that survive depleted uranium shells falling on their farms, villagess and cities will turn around and KILL the rich people who called for those attacks...

Nah. Never happen. *chuckle*

[link|http://www.runningworks.com|

]

Imric's Tips for Living

Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.

Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.

Post #234,746

by jake123

11/17/05 4:30:13 PM

It's a risk to the profits of the rich people that make it.

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Second hand smoke - (andread) - (14) - Nov. 12, 2005, 09:42:07 PM EST

I suspect common old Junk Stats, too - (Ashton) - Nov. 13, 2005, 01:17:05 AM EST

It's a difficult topic - (pwhysall) - (3) - Nov. 13, 2005, 02:39:31 AM EST

of course second hand smoke is bad for you - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:55:25 AM EST

There are those who claim it's harmless, albeit stinky. -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:45:30 PM EST

depends on your definition of harmless I suppose - (boxley) - Nov. 13, 2005, 12:47:55 PM EST

Some links. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:03:19 AM EST

Re: Some links. - (andread) - (4) - Nov. 13, 2005, 04:52:29 PM EST

Because it's socially acceptable to demonize smokers - (jake123) - (3) - Nov. 17, 2005, 12:00:08 PM EST

I was sorta with you until depleted uranium. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Nov. 17, 2005, 03:27:14 PM EST

There's always the danger - (imric) - Nov. 17, 2005, 03:33:41 PM EST

It's a risk to the profits of the rich people that make it. -NT - (jake123) - Nov. 17, 2005, 04:30:13 PM EST

Re: second hand smoke - (imqwerky) - (2) - Nov. 13, 2005, 10:23:55 AM EST

Highly dangerous to dimes in precarious situations! -NT - (imric) - (1) - Nov. 13, 2005, 11:48:33 AM EST

;-) -NT - (imqwerky) - Nov. 13, 2005, 09:42:04 PM EST

iwethey.org

A free PhD thesis anytime someone wants to start 'measuring'.
39 ms