Bitch :-)

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #22,919 by Meerkat 1/2/02 8:51:53 PM Reply	Bitch :-) On and on and on and on, and on and on and on goes John.
Post #22,925 by admin 1/2/02 11:17:58 PM Reply	Re: Bitch :-) It's as much of a problem as the other direction, weight-wise, whether you want to believe that or not. :-) Regards, -scott anderson
Post #22,927 by Meerkat 1/2/02 11:32:10 PM Reply	Yep, I beleive it. I just had to take a swipe at someone who stays thin no matter what. I think it's an obligation of Team Lardarse :) A metabolism that's out of whack in either direction is a hassle. Well, how about an exchange. Liposuction vs Lipoimplant. Ew. I shouldn't say anything that might put you off your food. On and on and on and on, and on and on and on goes John.
Post #22,954 by admin 1/3/02 10:12:18 AM Reply	I've always said: that I'm taking donations. ;-) Although I'd prefer muscle over fat. :-P Regards, -scott anderson
Post #120,013 by Another Scott 10/3/03 3:49:35 PM Reply	This week's The Straight Dope Classic [link\|http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a1_275c.html\|I can't gain weight! Is my metabolism too fast?] - from 1982. The most straightforward explanation is that people who have a hard time gaining weight (what we refer to as ectomorphs) simply have fewer muscle and fat cells to absorb the extra bulk than more athletic types. Fortunately, tests have shown that weight training can add new muscle cells, a process called hyperplasia. This is a lot more work than simply strengthening existing muscle cells, admittedly, but you can take some comfort in the fact that the new muscle cells stay with you all your life, even if you knock off weight training later on. Arnold has some tips for you. :-) Cheers, Scott.
Post #120,114 by admin 10/4/03 7:34:15 PM Reply	Interesting... Although, I weight lifted for 2 years in college (with the carbo/protein shakes, etc.) and gained a sum total of 5 pounds. When I stopped the exercise, I lost the weight. :-P Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Order! Order! - (pwhysall) - (55) - Jan. 2, 2002, 06:24:26 PM EST

I'll have the roast chicken combo :) - (nking) - Jan. 2, 2002, 06:26:22 PM EST

ZLC: Ziwethey Loves Chocolate - (Meerkat) - Jan. 2, 2002, 06:45:46 PM EST

BMI link for the interested. - (static) - (25) - Jan. 2, 2002, 06:50:02 PM EST

An expletive registering shock and/or surprise! - (Meerkat) - Jan. 2, 2002, 07:05:01 PM EST

Re: BMI link for the interested. - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 2, 2002, 07:07:23 PM EST

Ways to lose weight - (Meerkat) - (6) - Jan. 2, 2002, 07:14:20 PM EST

Re: Ways to lose weight - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 2, 2002, 07:32:30 PM EST

And the only reason I lost that weight... - (Meerkat) - Jan. 2, 2002, 07:39:43 PM EST

ZZ Top Diet - (tuberculosis) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2002, 01:17:24 PM EST

cut back WHAT!! -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2002, 01:33:51 PM EST

Sorry - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2002, 05:27:00 PM EST

"Phew!" said Meerkat, reaching for the vodka... -NT - (Meerkat) - Jan. 6, 2002, 06:19:52 AM EST

bogus fat indicator - (cforde) - (1) - Jan. 2, 2002, 07:56:59 PM EST

This is true. - (static) - Jan. 2, 2002, 08:05:33 PM EST

What shape? - (Yendor) - Jan. 3, 2002, 09:46:40 AM EST

Oh fark - (Yendor) - (5) - Jan. 3, 2002, 09:50:39 AM EST

Perhaps you need some of whatever the Ents drink? :-) -NT - (static) - (4) - Jan. 3, 2002, 05:00:14 PM EST

The whosiwhat's? -NT - (Yendor) - (3) - Jan. 3, 2002, 06:30:50 PM EST

The Entwash. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2002, 01:15:04 PM EST

That's the name of the river, wasn't it? - (static) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2002, 11:46:16 PM EST

You're correct - (wharris2) - Jan. 4, 2002, 11:50:03 PM EST

24.3, you bunch of fat asses. ppphhtttttbbbb! -NT - (n3jja) - (6) - Jan. 4, 2002, 10:56:13 PM EST

Yeah...and you don't have a spare, do you? - (bepatient) - (5) - Jan. 4, 2002, 11:00:16 PM EST

Lost 10 lbs without even trying. Pissed the GF off, too. :-) -NT - (n3jja) - (4) - Jan. 4, 2002, 11:06:55 PM EST

I lost 6 pounds - (nking) - (3) - Jan. 5, 2002, 12:46:32 PM EST

Re: I lost 6 pounds - (wharris2) - (2) - Jan. 5, 2002, 02:24:18 PM EST

Fat distrobution - (nking) - Jan. 5, 2002, 02:38:51 PM EST

Losing and gaining weight - some numbers. - (Another Scott) - Jan. 6, 2002, 10:03:58 AM EST

Bah. - (admin) - (7) - Jan. 2, 2002, 08:09:52 PM EST

Bitch :-) -NT - (Meerkat) - (5) - Jan. 2, 2002, 08:51:53 PM EST

Re: Bitch :-) - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 2, 2002, 11:17:58 PM EST

Yep, I beleive it. - (Meerkat) - (3) - Jan. 2, 2002, 11:32:10 PM EST

I've always said: - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 3, 2002, 10:12:18 AM EST

This week's The Straight Dope Classic - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2003, 03:49:35 PM EDT

Interesting... - (admin) - Oct. 4, 2003, 07:34:15 PM EDT

Yes...you are. - (bepatient) - Jan. 2, 2002, 11:36:36 PM EST

not ed zachery fat - (boxley) - Jan. 3, 2002, 08:38:21 AM EST

Since I suggested this - (jbrabeck) - Jan. 3, 2002, 08:46:20 AM EST

Re: Order! Order! - (folkert) - Jan. 3, 2002, 09:40:37 AM EST

Let's see - (SpiceWare) - Jan. 3, 2002, 10:08:18 AM EST

Disorder! Datorder! - (inthane-chan) - (7) - Jan. 3, 2002, 12:12:30 PM EST

Re: Disorder! Datorder! - (Yendor) - (6) - Jan. 3, 2002, 12:38:05 PM EST

Is there a song about that - Ma\ufffdana? :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 3, 2002, 01:20:36 PM EST

Actually, I'm down 15 pounds. - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Jan. 6, 2002, 11:59:15 PM EST

Well then you should quit betting against Peter! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 7, 2002, 12:25:09 AM EST

Wooness! - (Yendor) - Jan. 7, 2002, 09:35:58 AM EST

I just did the same in under 15 minutes... - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 7, 2002, 05:31:48 PM EST

Now down 30 pounds. - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 27, 2002, 09:41:05 PM EST

I think I'm doing OK - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2002, 01:17:52 PM EST

I fully support the Blanchard Test! - (Meerkat) - Jan. 3, 2002, 05:24:56 PM EST

Wow, that BMI thingy is bogus - (drewk) - (4) - Jan. 3, 2002, 03:11:47 PM EST

Frame Size is key. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Jan. 3, 2002, 04:10:13 PM EST

Well, even by that measure - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2002, 04:16:43 PM EST

Yes, I did think they were a shade low. - (static) - Jan. 3, 2002, 05:06:23 PM EST

Size is relative - (nking) - Jan. 3, 2002, 06:31:09 PM EST

Now, with 10% more RAM!
70 ms