Controversy boiling over?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #226,545 by warmachine 9/26/05 1:11:44 PM Reply	Controversy boiling over? "All the Dover school board did was allow students to get a glimpse of a controversy that is really boiling over in the scientific community," Controversy boiling over? I still can't find any books, articles in New Scientist or documentaries on TV about ID. How the hell do I keep on missing it? And since when do school boards make it their business that students follow current, scientific debate so closely? Do they insist students follow the latest in genetic modification and particle physics? Or is this another case of wishful thinking? Matthew Greet Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourself. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin? - Mark Renton, Trainspotting.
Post #226,596 by tuberculosis 9/26/05 6:27:25 PM Reply	Re: Controversy boiling over? [link\|http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2732&program=News&callingPage=discoMainPage\|http://www.discovery...age=discoMainPage] [link\|http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2834&program=CSC&callingPage=discoMainPage\|http://www.discovery...age=discoMainPage] [link\|http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=CSC&id=2845&callingPage=discoMainPage\|http://www.discovery...age=discoMainPage] Lots more junk science where that came from. "Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" --Mark Twain "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." --Albert Einstein "This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses." --George W. Bush
Post #226,602 by warmachine 9/26/05 7:10:09 PM Reply	Not a scientific institution or publisher Matthew Greet Choose Life. Choose a job. Choose a career. Choose a family. Choose a fucking big television, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc players and electrical tin openers. Choose good health, low cholesterol, and dental insurance. Choose fixed interest mortgage repayments. Choose a starter home. Choose your friends. Choose leisurewear and matching luggage. Choose DIY and wondering who the fuck you are on a Sunday morning. Choose sitting on that couch watching mind-numbing, spirit-crushing game shows, stuffing fucking junk food into your mouth. Choose rotting away at the end of it all, pishing your last in a miserable home, nothing more than an embarrassment to the selfish, fucked up brats you spawned to replace yourself. Choose your future. Choose life... But why would I want to do a thing like that? I chose not to choose life. I chose somethin' else. And the reasons? There are no reasons. Who needs reasons when you've got heroin? - Mark Renton, Trainspotting.
Post #226,603 by ben_tilly 9/26/05 7:11:39 PM Reply	They claim they are. I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #226,695 by tuberculosis 9/27/05 12:48:25 PM Reply	Most people can't tell "Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" --Mark Twain "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." --Albert Einstein "This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses." --George W. Bush
Post #226,705 by jake123 9/27/05 1:12:32 PM Reply	Easy way to snuff them Get the Discovery Channel to nail 'em for trademark infringement. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #226,605 by boxley 9/26/05 7:21:48 PM Reply	when peer's refuse to read work are they still scientists? "the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #226,805 by Ashton 9/27/05 7:00:54 PM Reply	When the submission is unverifiable, should they have to try ? You cannot submit a metaphysical Wondering for 'scrutiny', calling it 'a scientific enquiry'. That is so inappropriate it isn't even Wrong. The scrutinizers' methodology is understood to be: experiment, observe, hypothesize; publish for critique - wash/repeat. ie Straw Question

The circus is back in town. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Sept. 26, 2005, 12:19:02 PM EDT

Already raised in religion - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 26, 2005, 12:59:47 PM EDT

Saw it too late, but "ID is science" donchaknow. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 26, 2005, 04:18:30 PM EDT

Controversy boiling over? - (warmachine) - (7) - Sept. 26, 2005, 01:11:44 PM EDT

Re: Controversy boiling over? - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Sept. 26, 2005, 06:27:25 PM EDT

Not a scientific institution or publisher -NT - (warmachine) - (3) - Sept. 26, 2005, 07:10:09 PM EDT

They claim they are. -NT - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 26, 2005, 07:11:39 PM EDT

Most people can't tell -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2005, 12:48:25 PM EDT

Easy way to snuff them - (jake123) - Sept. 27, 2005, 01:12:32 PM EDT

when peer's refuse to read work are they still scientists? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Sept. 26, 2005, 07:21:48 PM EDT

When the submission is unverifiable, should they have to try - (Ashton) - Sept. 27, 2005, 07:00:54 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Hm. It all seems to cancel out. I’m back to not caring.
280 ms