Post #225,466
9/19/05 1:22:23 PM
|

Re: think of proofs as straightforward.
I would prefer that, too. The problem is that very few people I've met have the reasoning abilities required to follow a modus ponens argument.
bcnu, Mikem
It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
|
Post #225,525
9/19/05 6:35:17 PM
|

I'll have to disagree with you on that
I've met a lot of people with the ability but without the patience.
I've met far fewer who could not learn it.
In any case, real mathematicians almost never write out formal proofs. The exercise of doing so strikes me as nearly useless. Knowing that you can is useful, but doing it is not.
Cheers, Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
Post #225,598
9/20/05 11:18:42 AM
|

Nit.
In any case, real mathematicians almost never write out formal proofs.
Except, of course, those who must publish to keep their positions. They do it at least once in a while. At any rate, I'm certainly glad Andrew Wiles did. ;0)
bcnu, Mikem
It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
|
Post #225,652
9/20/05 7:18:19 PM
|

Nit denied
The proofs that you see published are closer to vague outlines of how a competent person might construct a formal proof than they are to formal proofs.
And yes, that includes Andrew Wiles. Whose first "outline" turned out to have a hole that a competent person could not be expected to be able to fill in, though he managed to come up with a workaround.
Cheers, Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
Post #225,741
9/21/05 12:37:40 PM
9/21/05 12:39:10 PM
|

What's your point?
That professors of mathematics never write formal proofs? Or that professors are not "professionals"? Because, CLEARLY, professors of mathematics (at least at Purdue and North Carolina) *do* write formal proofs and submit them for publication.
[Edit]: BTW, where'd you get your M.S. in Mathematics? Presumeably, at a place where none of your professors wrote formal proofs, right?
bcnu, Mikem
It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell

Edited by mmoffitt
Sept. 21, 2005, 12:39:10 PM EDT
|
Post #225,760
9/21/05 2:49:18 PM
|

My point is that...
a formal proof is a very specific thing, and very few proofs that you'll find in the mathematical literature are formal proofs.
If you find this strange, then you either have no familiarity with what real math papers look like, or you don't really know what a formal proof looks like.
This applies as much at Dartmouth College, where I got my masters, as it does at Purdue and North Carolina. Furthermore if you talked to a logician from any of those three universities, I guarantee that they would agree with me.
All of this is well-known within the profession. It even has shown up on the wikipedia, for instance see [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof|http://en.wikipedia....athematical_proof].
Cheers, Ben
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
|
Post #225,769
9/21/05 3:26:10 PM
|

Ah. Dartmouth.
That explains the arrogance. :-p
bcnu, Mikem
It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
|