IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New It has nothing to do with smug
It has to do with what the fuck your Berk and our Berk are doing to our world. As bad as the "patriot" act is, it doesn't (at my last reading, anyway) authorize shoot-to-kill. Nor does it authorize the deportation of native-born nationals under any circumstances; for that matter, it doesn't authorize deportation of foreign born nationals for such things as advocating the overthrow of the govenrment, or for such mundanities as have the audacity to visit an unapproved website. It does authorize all sorts of heretorfore illegal surveilance, search and siezure, and is a data warehousers wet dream. But the only thing those dreamers are shooting is gizm, not bullets.

(And I'd say that was a rather significant difference, wouldn't you?)



[Edit: tyosp]
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

Collapse Edited by jb4 Aug. 17, 2005, 04:50:46 PM EDT
It has nothing to do with smug
It has to do with what the fuck your Berk and our berk are doung to our world. As bad as the "patriot" act is, it doesn't (at my last reading, anyway) authorize shoot-to-kill. Nor does it authorize the deportation of native-born nationals under any circumstances; for that matter, it doesn't authorize deportation of foreign born nationals for such things as advocating the overthrow of the govenrment, or for such mundanities as have the audacity to visit an unapproved website. It does authorize all sorts of heretorfore illegal surveilance, search and siezure, and is a data warehousers wet dream. But the only thing those dreamers are shooting is gizm, not bullets.

(And I'd say that was a rather significant difference, wouldn't you?)
jb4
shrub•bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New Have you *read* USA-PATRIOT?
It's not so much an act as a non-context diff.

It may well authorise shoot-to-kill; you as a normal human have no chance whatsoever of determining this.

And I'd say that shoot-to-kill is modus operandi in Iraq, so, yes, they do.

And on the foreign-born national thing? Gitmo. Detention without charge. Secret military tribunals. Etc.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New sorry dude
And on the foreign-born national thing? Gitmo. Detention without charge. Secret military tribunals.

Sorry, dude, but that far antedated PAT-Riot. The President (in the abstract, as opposed to the instance now holding that title) has had the ability do authorize all that for quite some time now.

And I'd say that shoot-to-kill is modus operandi in Iraq, so, yes, they do.

You're going to have to do much better than that. As the latest incarnation ofthe War Powers act gives the military (cf police) powers to invade a sovereign state for the purpose of securing their oil supplyDemocracy for that benighted part of the world, they can shoot whenver they want. The army hasn't invaded the USA (yet...).

Not up to your normal rhetorical style, Pete, but then it is rather more difficult to defend the indefensible, now isn't it...?
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New I'm not defending anything
I'm just pointing out that you are at least if not more fucked that I am.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New s/if not more//
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New You sure?
My not-very-grammatical sentence makes even less sense if you do that.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New I think he meant...
s /at least if not more fucked that I am/really missing out if you're not using Eclipse for perl like me/

HTH!

Cheers,
Scott.
New Oh, yuo aer teh funneh!
I've tipped my waitress.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Lets try: s/if not more/as/
It was late, and I was tired...(but I must say I like Another Scott's interpretation...).


And even then, its a CRC-worthy train wreck.
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

Expand Edited by jb4 Aug. 18, 2005, 09:44:16 AM EDT
Expand Edited by jb4 Aug. 18, 2005, 09:44:35 AM EDT
New "s/if not more fucked that/as fucked as/" HTH!
Expand Edited by CRConrad Aug. 18, 2005, 12:42:21 PM EDT
Expand Edited by CRConrad Aug. 18, 2005, 12:43:36 PM EDT
     gosh...seems that the poor dead Brazilian - (rcareaga) - (90)
         Curious. - (mmoffitt) - (68)
             You're already way more fucked than we will ever be. - (pwhysall) - (66)
                 You elected the guy who let himself get ROLLED by that. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3)
                     We'll self-correct, as we did post-Thatcher. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                         This is sad. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                             ICLRPDee (new thread) - (Ashton)
                 Show me where. - (mmoffitt) - (61)
                     DevAdvo:Don't tell jokes going through airport security. :-/ - (Another Scott) - (60)
                         Except the UK is already there, man. - (mmoffitt) - (59)
                             Fight The Powah! - (pwhysall) - (58)
                                 look at the bright side, less bystander deaths on your end -NT - (boxley)
                                 Re: Shoot-to-kill is nothing new on either side of the pond. - (mmoffitt) - (25)
                                     What makes you think there hasn't been tremendous public - (jake123) - (24)
                                         Linky to tremendous public outcry? -NT - (jb4) - (23)
                                             Well, it's big news here - (jake123) - (22)
                                                 Touch\ufffd! -NT - (Ashton)
                                                 Non sequitor. - (mmoffitt) - (20)
                                                     Yeah, the son was only shot in the back - (jake123)
                                                     WTF!! what x-files episode were you watching to get that - (boxley) - (18)
                                                         Nit: ATF ninjas, not FBI, IIRC. -NT - (jake123) - (17)
                                                             feebs - (boxley) - (16)
                                                                 FBI it is - (jake123) - (2)
                                                                     have you read "from freedom to slavery"? by the lawyer -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         Think that must have been it. - (jake123)
                                                                 Thank you for making my point about the difference. - (mmoffitt) - (12)
                                                                     I see, guilty until shot by cops -NT - (boxley) - (9)
                                                                         Not at all. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                                                             what was the circumstance of his prior acts? -NT - (boxley) - (7)
                                                                                 IIRC it was carrying a rifle in his truck. -NT - (jake123) - (6)
                                                                                     make him look, it was balatent entrapment -NT - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                                         Wasn't aware that carrying a rifle in your truck was illegal - (jake123) - (4)
                                                                                             It isn't. And that is NOT REMOTELY what it was. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                                                                 Yeah, after all, a "man in fatigues" is immediately - (jake123) - (2)
                                                                                                     DOJ Report on Ruby Ridge. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                                         if that is a statement of fact I now must turn raellian - (boxley)
                                                                     That hardly covers his wife and son. - (jake123) - (1)
                                                                         See Edit above ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                 One more thing. Your attitude is scary. - (mmoffitt) - (30)
                                     When was the last time you demonstrated on behalf of someone - (jake123) - (1)
                                         Well... - (jb4)
                                     Re: One more thing. Your attitude is scary. - (pwhysall) - (27)
                                         pay attention marlowe you might learn something -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Thanks, I think... -NT - (pwhysall)
                                         Again, a mischaracterization. - (mmoffitt) - (24)
                                             Goes to show you: Ben Franklin wasn't a Brit... -NT - (jb4) - (1)
                                                 ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                             Shoot to kill is fine, in the USA - (pwhysall) - (21)
                                                 Excuse me, but can you give me a linky to... - (jb4) - (20)
                                                     You keep your tongue away from my ass - (pwhysall) - (19)
                                                         Hmmmm...not an Iraqi in the bunch. Thanks for playing.... -NT - (jb4) - (15)
                                                             You're being intentionally obtuse here. - (jake123) - (9)
                                                                 I rather don't think so - (jb4) - (8)
                                                                     s/continent/planet/ - (pwhysall) - (7)
                                                                         Ididn't know the USA constituted the whole planet! - (jb4) - (6)
                                                                             Re: Ididn't know the USA constituted the whole planet! - (pwhysall)
                                                                             I can parse that for you: - (CRConrad) - (4)
                                                                                 Mah-noor! - (jb4) - (3)
                                                                                     Your noor, indeed, not mahn. They're placed *exactly* right. -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                                                                         And all this time, I was amazed at your mastery... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                                                             The question wasn't about the WORD, "fine"... - (CRConrad)
                                                             Point being... - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                 its more a shoot in the general direction of the subject -NT - (boxley)
                                                                 The difference is we insist on cause. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                     if they are as dark as that brazillian that is cause -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         And when that happens, riots ensue. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                         Interesting choice that third one. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                             If it validates your worldview. - (pwhysall)
                                                         ICLRPD - (imqwerky)
             Beg to compare absurdities, before experiencing that 'lump' - (Ashton)
         Yo! warmachine! Need I say it...? - (jb4) - (20)
             Go ahead - (warmachine) - (19)
                 small villa in Majorca maybe where benny hill is your waiter -NT - (boxley)
                 It ain't no fun if it's solicited, but since you asked... - (jb4) - (17)
                     Explain why! -NT - (warmachine) - (16)
                         You ARE kidding, right? - (jb4) - (15)
                             It's no different over there - (pwhysall) - (12)
                                 Ahem. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (ben_tilly)
                                 It has nothing to do with smug - (jb4) - (9)
                                     Have you *read* USA-PATRIOT? - (pwhysall) - (8)
                                         sorry dude - (jb4) - (7)
                                             I'm not defending anything - (pwhysall) - (6)
                                                 s/if not more// -NT - (jb4) - (5)
                                                     You sure? - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                         I think he meant... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                             Oh, yuo aer teh funneh! - (pwhysall)
                                                         Lets try: s/if not more/as/ - (jb4) - (1)
                                                             "s/if not more fucked that/as fucked as/" HTH! -NT - (CRConrad)
                             Better -NT - (warmachine)
                             s /dense pill/Dunce pill/ Save CRC the trouble. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)

And so on, and so forth.
103 ms