IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Curious.
The above event and listening to Blair over the past few weeks has kindled a "love of country" in me. Perhaps I have more faith than I usually care to admit. While it is true that we are fscked up by most anyone's standards, I find myself thinking, "Yes, it's true. We're an overweight, under-educated, xenophobic lot for the most part. And most of us (or at least half who bothered to vote) actually elected His Moroness this time. But we will recover. We will shed the Neocons some time. The majority will never let us get as completely fscked up as Great Britain is right now."
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New You're already way more fucked than we will ever be.
Hey, you elected THAT.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New You elected the guy who let himself get ROLLED by that.
New We'll self-correct, as we did post-Thatcher.
You chaps are on a one-way express elevator to hell.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New This is sad.
We're playing 'Your leader is dumber than mine...'

:(
apt-get install godlike-powers
New ICLRPDee (new thread)
Created as new thread #219852 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=219852|ICLRPDee]

New Show me where.
Point to a somewhere near recent example (hillbilly southern cops in the south in the 1930's doesn't count) of cops holding a suspect down and shooting him 7 times in the head - for doing absolutely NOTHING at all. Show me where criticizing the government is "verbotten" - or even where a law like that in this country is being considered. And don't give me the Patriot Act bullshit. As bad as that is, it doesn't overrule our First Amendment - something we escaped your kind of leadership to create.

We've got a ways to go to be as fucked up as you are. And as for elections, you guys had a helluva lot more recent chance to throw Dub's poodle out than we've had to throw your leader's master out. And your guy won by a fuckload larger margin that our guy did. Care to wager on Dub's chances for a third term if it was possible? Here's a hint: -> 0

No sir. My hat's off to you. On the "completely fucked up" scale, you guys have pulled ahead.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New DevAdvo:Don't tell jokes going through airport security. :-/
There are some places where freedom of speech doesn't apply. Standing in line at airport security is one of them.

"Oh, but that's private property/different ..." Yeah, there are understandable reasons for it, but it shows that constitutional guarantees aren't as absolute as we might expect.

People in the US have been killed under gruesome circumstances too when the cops thought someone was a threat. Remember [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amadou_Bailo_Diallo|Amadou Diallo]? :-(

Both the US and the UK will get through this period without turning into some sort of police state.

FWIW.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Except the UK is already there, man.
That's all I'm saying. The UK has a shoot-to-kill-ask-questions-later policy and the authors of that policy enjoy (apparently from their most recent election) a far greater breadth of support than even Dub could ever muster here.

We're both in a very dark time, but the UK is pitch black.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New Fight The Powah!
Death To The Blair Pigdog!

Already there.

One police fuckup resulting in one dead Brazilian and you're all excitable.

How many people get shot dead by the police in the USA every year, Mike? How many of those are innocent?

Shoot-to-kill is nothing new on either side of the pond. It's just that over here, it gets on the news. Remember Gibraltar, the IRA and the SAS?


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New look at the bright side, less bystander deaths on your end
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Re: Shoot-to-kill is nothing new on either side of the pond.
Maybe that's it. Maybe that's the real reason behind the first rumblings of a sense of national pride in me. Maybe the illusion that it is "actually better elsewhere" is fading.

To be sure, cops in this country kill their fair share of innocents. Rodney King got his ass whipped on teevee for all to see. But, Rodney actually threatened a cop before being pulverized. And the reaction included not only tons of news coverage but actual riots in the streets. How many riots have the London murder caused? I don't know, maybe its just the extra heinousness of holding some one down while cops put 7 bullets in his head that makes me recoil at this. I can't imagine something like that happening here without tremendous public outcry.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New What makes you think there hasn't been tremendous public
outcry?

Don't forget, just because it hasn't been on your news doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

My take? First, the triggerman needs to lose his job immediately, sans pay. Second, there needs to be a murder investigation to see if he needs to be charged. Third, I think the shoot to kill policy should be revisited, after all, I'm not sure that Israel's treatment of Palestinians is exactly the right model to follow... after all, how well have those techniques worked for them in preventing bombings? Fourth, the family of the victim should sue the Met Police. It will take a while, but I can't see how they could not end up receiving punitive damages against them. Finally, the guy that was taking a piss and erroneously told his fellow officers that one of the suspects had left the building should also be fired immediately.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Linky to tremendous public outcry?
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New Well, it's big news here
Somehow, I don't doubt that it's big news there too.

As for reportable manifestations of people's opinions on this... it's been what, three days? Considering the strength of the anti-Iraq War movement in the UK, it won't take that long for it to make itself felt.

Let me put it another way... do you expect the talking heads on Fox news or even the BBC to raise a hue and cry? Not bloody likely, but those are the people that are going to have the bully pulpit at first.

How long did it take for their to be a big hue and cry about Ruby Ridge?
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Touch\ufffd!

New Non sequitor.
Ruby Ridge != an innocent civilian, doing absolutely nothing threatening being ruthlessly murdered by overzealous law officers. HTH.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New Yeah, the son was only shot in the back
the wife was shot in the house, from long range.

No way she could have posed an immediate threat to anyone's life, even if a case could be made for the boy, who was carrying a rifle when he was shot.

Relevantly similar, I'd say.

And... how long did it take for their to be a hue and cry? Quite a while, IIRC, but it did show up (and rightly so, imho).

You've got to expect that to take a wee bit of time in Merrie Olde England as well.

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New WTF!! what x-files episode were you watching to get that
he was at home doing lawful things, instead of letting the local sheriff walk him in they brought out fbi ninja's who killed the family dog and shot his son in the back while he ran away. I wouldnt want to come out under those conditions either and without being armed no doubt he would be as dead as that brazillian.
thanx,
bill
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Nit: ATF ninjas, not FBI, IIRC.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New feebs
[link|http://www.cato.org/dailys/08-21-02-2.html|http://www.cato.org/...s/08-21-02-2.html]
On August 21, 1992 a paramilitary unit of the U.S. Marshals Service ventured onto the 20-acre property known as Ruby Ridge. A man named Randy Weaver owned the land and he lived there with his wife, children, and a family friend, Kevin Harris. There was an outstanding warrant for Weaver's arrest for a firearms offense and the marshals were surveilling the premises. When the family dog noticed the marshals sneaking around in the woods, it began to bark wildly. Weaver's 14-year-old boy, Sammy, and Kevin Harris proceeded to grab their rifles because they thought the dog had come upon a wild animal.

A firefight erupted when a marshal shot and killed the dog. Enraged that the family pet had been cut down for no good reason, Sammy shot into the woods at the unidentified trespasser. Within a few minutes, two human beings were shot dead: Sammy Weaver and a marshal. Harris and the Weaver family retreated to their cabin and the marshals retreated from the mountain and called the FBI for assistance.

During the night, FBI snipers took positions around the Weaver cabin. There is no dispute about the fact that the snipers were given illegal "shoot to kill" orders. Under the law, police agents can use deadly force to defend themselves and others from imminent attack, but these snipers were instructed to shoot any adult who was armed and outside the cabin, regardless of whether the adult posed a threat or not. The next morning, an FBI agent shot and wounded Randy Weaver. A few moments later, the same agent shot Weaver's wife in the head as she was standing in the doorway of her home holding a baby in her arms. The FBI snipers had not yet announced their presence and had not given the Weavers an opportunity to peacefully surrender.
thanx,
bill
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New FBI it is
I read the book by the Weaver's lawyer quite some time back.... must've confused the detail with Waco.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New have you read "from freedom to slavery"? by the lawyer
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Think that must have been it.
Just looked through his bibliography at Amazon, and that looks like the most likely of his books.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Thank you for making my point about the difference.
In your own quoted words: "There was an outstanding warrant for Weaver's arrest for a firearms offense..."

Still don't see the HUGE difference? Maybe this will help. Weaver could rightly be presumed to be armed and dangerous. Can you say the same for the Brazilian? Okay, got it now?
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New I see, guilty until shot by cops
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Not at all.
The "victim" in one case was an innocent civilian, in the other the suspect of a crime.

[Edit: that's too brief]. I'm not saying the wife and kid were criminal suspects, but if you live with criminal suspects you enhance greatly your chance of coming to harm. For all the hype from the NRA and gun nuts everywhere, Ruby Ridge was nothing more than an accident which would not have happened were it not for prior acts by Weaver.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
Expand Edited by mmoffitt Aug. 19, 2005, 11:21:45 AM EDT
New what was the circumstance of his prior acts?
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New IIRC it was carrying a rifle in his truck.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New make him look, it was balatent entrapment
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Wasn't aware that carrying a rifle in your truck was illegal
It's not even illegal in Canada, assuming you have the requisite permits for said rifle in the first place. It can be illegal if it's not properly secured (trigger lock, locked box), but if a cop asks you to show it to them and you take it out to show it's properly secured, he can't then turn around and charge you with carrying an unsecured firearm.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New It isn't. And that is NOT REMOTELY what it was.
The August 1992 standoff at the Weavers' remote cabin near Naples began after federal agents tried to arrest Randy Weaver for failing to appear in court to face charges of selling two illegal sawed-off shotguns.


[link|http://www.cnn.com/US/9708/21/ruby.ridge/|http://www.cnn.com/U...08/21/ruby.ridge/]

Randy Weaver was a white separatist nut-case who moved his family to the boondocks to await the end of the world (didn't want his family infected by us sinners).

As for the "innocent 13 year old" we have this from a site sympathetic to the Weavers.

According to what officers told retired L.A. police captain Frank Isbell at the scene, the siege began on August 21 when a six-man U.S. marshall SWAT team in camouflage fatigues \ufffd and without a warrant \ufffd trespassed on the Weaver property and began a reconnaissance in preparation for an assault on the Weaver home scheduled for sometime in October. When the three Weaver dogs began barking. Weaver, his 13-year-old son Samuel, and family friend Kevin Harris grabbed their rifles and followed the dogs, thinking they had trapped game. Samuel and Harris followed the dogs through the forest while Weaver went around by way of the road to circle the game.

Suddenly, a man in fatigues jumped up from some thick brush and shot one of the dogs. Samuel, not knowing who the intruder was and angry over the death of a dog he had personally raised and trained, fired back. . . whereupon someone fired upon him. wounding him in the shoulder. Samuel turned to run back home when he was hit in the back and killed instantly.


[link|http://www.constitution.org/col/san920910.htm|http://www.constitut...col/san920910.htm]

"Weaver, his 13-year-old son Samuel, and family friend Kevin Harris grabbed their rifles and followed the dogs, thinking they had trapped game." Thinking they had trapped game - right.

I have no idea as to the veracity of the above post. But keep in mind it is written in such a way as to put the most positive light possible upon the Weavers. If it's true, then the lesson here would be don't shoot at a cop if you want to live.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New Yeah, after all, a "man in fatigues" is immediately
identifiable as a cop. No warrant either. How about that.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Expand Edited by jake123 Aug. 19, 2005, 05:04:01 PM EDT
New DOJ Report on Ruby Ridge.
[link|http://web3.foxinternet.net/djf/ruby001.htm#tab|Here]. I assume it's authentic.

[link|http://web3.foxinternet.net/djf/Ruby007.htm#R07I03|IV.C.2. Statement of Facts] excerpts:

In late September 1991, Hunt and Ely interviewed Beverly and Ed Torrence, who owned land adjacent to the Weaver property. The Torrences explained that they had encountered the Weavers a few days earlier when they had gone up to view their property. At that time, the Torrences drove near the Weaver house and stopped to ask about some property markers. The Weaver dogs came to their car, followed by Sammy Weaver, who called to the house. The Torrences then saw Randy Weaver and "Dennis" looking down on them from a rock outcropping.[FN205] Each held a rifle or shotgun. Thereafter, the Torrences were invited into the Weaver cabin where Randy and Vicki Weaver explained their religious and political views.

Randy Weaver told the Torrences that the Aryans are the true chosen people of Yahweh and that the Jews are impersonators.[FN206] He claimed that a federal informant had introduced him to the Aryan Nations. Weaver also discussed the BATF arrest and that he was expecting federal agents to come to his home, but that he was not going to be arrested by anyone. According to Weaver, he and his family would shoot federal law enforcement officials who came on his property. "If they do take me, I'll take some with me," and that is "[w]hy we have the guns." Beverly Torrence observed that Weaver appeared "vehement in his belief that he would rather fight than go peaceable (sic)."[FN207]

[...]

The Marshals Service is required by statute to execute arrest warrants. Consequently, once a warrant was issued for Randy Weaver's arrest, the Marshals Service had no choice but to undertake efforts to apprehend Weaver. Faced with Weaver's repeated threats to violently resist arrest, the Marshals Service explored many alternative plans designed to capture Weaver, but to do so without harming Weaver, his family or the arresting officers. We believe that the Marshals Service acted properly and with due caution in pursuing this purpose. Moreover, we found no evidence that the Marshals Service was pressured by outside entities or was improperly motivated in its efforts. We find, however, that the court and the U.S. Attorney's Office did not appreciate the difficulties facing the Marshals Service, and made no effort to assist the Marshals Service in devising a peaceful solution to the problem.


[link|http://web3.foxinternet.net/djf/Ruby008.htm#R08I03|IV.D.2. Statement of Facts]:

Randy Weaver dictated this account of these events to his daughter, Sara, on August 26, 1992:

Approximately 11:30 Friday morning....the dogs started barking like they always do when strangers walk up the driveway. Randy, Kevin, and Sam ran out to the rock with their weapons. Randy was carrying a double barrel 12 gauge shotgun. Kevin was carrying a 30-06 bolt action rifle. Sam was carrying a 223 mini 14. [FN353] When they got to the rock, our yellow dog Striker was down at the pumphouse barking up into the woods. Randy, Kevin and Sam went down to investigate. Sam said he heard something, or someone running west, so they followed. Sam and Kevin followed Striker. Randy dropped down on the old logging road headed west.

I (Randy Weaver) didn't have any idea what they were chasing, but I was hoping it was a deer. [FN354]

Kevin Harris claimed that, from the intensity of the dog's reaction, he thought that there was "a large animal or a person" in the vicinity.[FN355] Vicki Weaver wrote in her journal on August 21, 1992:

Randy, Kevin and Sam go down past the pump house to see what's bothering the dog. He apparently made the servant of the New World Order retreat down Farnworth Road. They followed the dog part way down.[FN356]

Roderick told Cooper and Degan that a dog and a man with a rifle were running toward them and that they had to move out.[FN357] The OP team heard Roderick say, "Pull back!" and, "the dogs are on us."[FN358] Roderick took the lead as the marshals fled through the woods. The area was thickly forested, and the marshals made a great deal of noise as they ran.[FN359] As they fled down the mountain, the marshals stopped several times to determine whether they were being pursued and saw that they were.


Throughout the report there are an awful lot of allegations and reports of statements that Weaver made. And reports of informants.

If you believe the report, it doesn't sound as if the federal agents had it in for them. Especially the last bit makes it sound like the allegations that he wouldn't go without taking others with him were his true feelings.

I wasn't there, so I don't know what he said, what really happened and why, so don't take my comments as an apology for either side.

FWIW.

Cheers,
Scott.
New if that is a statement of fact I now must turn raellian
if that was the case, weaver would have been convicted on the arresting charge, as well as murder, he was not. The state government wanted to try the killer of mrs weaver, they would not do that unless they believe egregious harm had been done.
The US would not have settled a wrongful death suit in Weavers favor if those were the facts. I would rather go on the testimony under oath of the various proceedings otherwise there was only one shooter in Dallas 1963.
thanx,
bill
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New That hardly covers his wife and son.
She was standing literally babe-in-arms when shot in the head by a sniper. He was running away.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New See Edit above ;0)
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New One more thing. Your attitude is scary.
One police fuckup resulting in one dead Brazilian and you're all excitable.


Really. Surely you're not implying that "one dead Brazilian" is okay, are you?
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New When was the last time you demonstrated on behalf of someone
wrongly shot by a US police officer, is the point he's making I think.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Well...
...There was mayor Richard M. Daley's (father of the current mayor — often not-to-respectly referred to as "hizzoner") famous shoot-to-kill order in 1968... There were several demonstrations that that triggered...perhaps you may remember one particular dust-up that occurred around the time of a certain political convention?
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New Re: One more thing. Your attitude is scary.
There's a hundred thousand dead civilians in Iraq; a hundred thousand Jean Charles Menezes. Killed by UK and US ordnance, for the most part.

Three thousand Jean Charles Menezes die every year on the UK's roads; mostly due to bad driving. Forty-three thousand Jean Charles Menezes die every year on the highways of the USA, again, I'll wager, mostly due to bad driving.

Thirty-two thousand Jean Charles Menezes die every year in the USA, killed by guns, be it accidental or not.

Since 2001, more than seventy Jean Charles Menezes have died in police custody in the USA.

My point?

My point is that yes, Jean Charles Menezes died at the hands of the police, and was, it seems, innocent. This is a terrible tragedy and deserves a full and proper investigation, with those responsible brought to account. And this is being done.

But to go from "one man shot dead wrongly by police" to "The UK is now some kind of hellhole" is, frankly, silly.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New pay attention marlowe you might learn something
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Thanks, I think...


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Again, a mischaracterization.
But to go from "one man shot dead wrongly by police" to "The UK is now some kind of hellhole" is, frankly, silly.

A guy in an alley who reaches for his cell phone and the cop thinks he's grabbing a gun and shoots him - THAT is a tragic accident. Cops holding a guy down and pumping 7 rounds into the guy's head is a little more than an accident. The fact that it can be dismissed as "oh, well, that'll happen when we're all trying be kept safe" is, I think, not what the majority here would think or say. That is what I meant by "the UK is more fucked up than we are". It's not my position that the UK is "some kind of hellhole." It is my position - come to by observing the event, the reaction to it and even reading your posts - that the majority of UK'ers are more willing to sacrifice human rights than I thought was possible to gain a little temporary safety.

We are different. For example, NO politician here - not even our Neocons - would survive even mentioning support for a shoot-to-kill policy. In the UK, it seems, such a position for a politician is not only tolerated but actually supported. That makes us different to say the least.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New Goes to show you: Ben Franklin wasn't a Brit...
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New ;0)
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New Shoot to kill is fine, in the USA
As long as those being shot at are innocent Iraqis who get the living fuck shot out of them by US troops.

Take your rose tinted specs off.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Excuse me, but can you give me a linky to...
...instances of innocent Iraqis being shot on American soil by an American policeman?






(Or do I need to get all CRCish on yer mother-tongue-speaking ass?)
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New You keep your tongue away from my ass
s/in the USA/with the USA/ but anyway:

[link|http://www.commondreams.org/pressreleases/september99/090299b.htm|http://www.commondre...ber99/090299b.htm]

12 hollowpoint bullets for one poor headcase with a hammer.

[link|http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510392000?open&of=ENG-USA|http://web.amnesty.o...0?open&of=ENG-USA]

Unarmed, no criminal record, deader than corduroy.

[link|http://www.courttv.com/archive/national/diallo/chronology.html|http://www.courttv.c...o/chronology.html]

Unarmed, no criminal record, probably a bit deader than the other two on account of the 41 bullets fired at him.

[link|http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=9310252&src=rss/domesticNews|http://go.reuters.co...=rss/domesticNews]

Accidents will happen, I suppose. But she had cocaine in her bloodstream, so she probably had it coming.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Hmmmm...not an Iraqi in the bunch. Thanks for playing....
jb4
shrub\ufffd\ufffd\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New You're being intentionally obtuse here.
It's not working very well, imho.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New I rather don't think so
It was peter's assertion that we're running around here blasting "innocent Iraqis" off the face of the continent, as an explicit national policy. He provided links, purported to support this absurd assertion. I pointed out that the links had fuckall to do with that assertion. And I'm being obtuse.

Anything you say, Jake...anything you say.
jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New s/continent/planet/
As noted in my post.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New Ididn't know the USA constituted the whole planet!
Shoot to kill is fine, in the USA
As long as those being shot at are innocent Iraqis who get the living fuck shot out of them by US troops.
Try parsing that sentence from your post. If you speak English, you'll see that the assertion is that innocent Iraqis are getting hte living fuck shot out of them by US Troops, in the USA.

Now go dangle your modifiers somewhere else, goddammit!
jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New Re: Ididn't know the USA constituted the whole planet!
"s/in the USA/with the USA/ but anyway:"


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New I can parse that for you:
"Shoot to kill is fine, in the USA" == "Shoot-to-kill is considered a fine policy, in the USA" == It's in the USA that the *considering* is done.

So, "Shoot-to-kill *Iraqis in Iraq* is, in the USA, considered a fine policy" == "Shoot-to-kill Iraqis in Iraq is considered a fine policy, in the USA" == "Shoot to kill is fine, in the USA".

So Peter's original unedited sentence *CAN* very fucking well be read as applying to shooting Iraqis in Iraq.

FYI, FWIW, QED, HTH, and all that. (No YMMV, though. 'Coz if it did, it'd be wrong.)


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
New Mah-noor!
And you can take your dangling modifiers and get your ass and Peter's out of my yard.

You see, the double-equals in your equation are badly misplaced.
jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New Your noor, indeed, not mahn. They're placed *exactly* right.
New And all this time, I was amazed at your mastery...
...of what was for you a foreign language. I see now that my admiration was somewhat misplaced.

FYI, the word "fine" does not mean "is considered a fine policy", at least in English (and to the best of my limited experience, not in German either; I don't know Finnish, so YMMV.)
jb4
shrub●bish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New The question wasn't about the WORD, "fine"...
...but the PHRASE, "is fine". Here are some varations on it:

- "Whaddayamean, Grelzakianism 'is fine'?"

- "Well, Grelzakianism is fine with me!"

- "Grelzakianism might 'be fine' where *you* live... But not here."

- "What, is Grelzakianism not fine in Finland?!?"

- "That's funny; Grelzakianism is perfectly fine in the USA."


So, you're saying the prase "is fine" in this fictional conversation is NOT about how "Grelzakianism" (whatever the fuck that may be; say, a policy) is regarded?!?


And here *I* had been reasonably... Well, let's say, satisfied -- with *your* grasp of English. But now I see that *my* impression may have been somewhat exaggerated.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
New Point being...
...if the US police doesn't actually have a shoot-to-kill policy, it certainly bloody well looks like it.


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New its more a shoot in the general direction of the subject
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New The difference is we insist on cause.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New if they are as dark as that brazillian that is cause
"the reason people don't buy conspiracy theories is that they think conspiracy means everyone is on the same program. Thats not how it works. Everybody has a different program. They just all want the same guy dead. Socrates was a gadfly, but I bet he took time out to screw somebodies wife" Gus Vitelli

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 49 years. meep
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New And when that happens, riots ensue.
bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New Interesting choice that third one.
Feb. 7: Hundreds of people turn out for a rally outside Diallo's modest two-story building in the Soundview section of the South Bronx, the first of a growing series of protests.


Hundreds of people protesting in a growing series of protests three days after the event. It's been what? Three weeks since the London murder? How many folks in the street in London over this?

Any way you slice it, the actions of the police on that day in London are clearly acceptable to the majority there. qed.

bcnu,
Mikem

It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
New If it validates your worldview.
I give up.

You've made up your mind. "Clearly acceptable", when it's "clearly" nothing of the sort.

But you keep on believing whatever it is you need to believe about whomsoever you need to believe it.

[link|http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&client=safari&rls=en-us&q=usa+police+shooting&btnG=Search|http://www.google.co...oting&btnG=Search]

Do SOME research, please. What's the top result?

(Clue: "Outrage grows in England over mistaken police killing", USA Today)


Peter
[link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu Linux]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
New ICLRPD
You keep your tongue away from my ass


/me shakes head violently to remove mental image!

Peace?
Amy


Yeah, yeah. I screwed it up again. One of these days I won't have such a greasy trigger finger. :-P

"The notion of limited government and frugal government has been shattered by this administration, which cares far less about limited government than it does in building conservative government - a government with huge payoffs to corporate America," Allan Lichtman, a presidential historian at American University in Washington.
Expand Edited by imqwerky Aug. 19, 2005, 07:36:08 PM EDT
New Beg to compare absurdities, before experiencing that 'lump'
as goes with the Anthems n'stuff:

I'd place bets on a temporarily fear-besotted UK correcting its excesses - -
-over-
The Base
- that overly-influential possessed minority of Fundamentalist zealots who have Proven that *Here* they can even.. Push the River:
that former-River wherein dwelt The Repos; our Machiavellian caste who were content with the tawdry 'life' of being 99.96% interested in personal $aggrandizement / and in cubicle-izing the proles (while classifying all personnel as belonging on the Debit-side of the biznessbottom line.)

Now - that Spine-chilling O.T.-Fear-besotted clan has sway over entire Red States; such conversions are never amenable to Reason, let alone that vaunted 'logic', as requires actual communication 'twixt the polarized opposites.

Sorry, no lumps in danger of arising here; not till the staph infection shows some sign of being successfully eaten by whatever healthy T-cells are still left in circulation.. if we even have a working immune system anymore.


Murica needs an Exorcist; UK just needs a normal 2x4 upside the body-politic-Head.

     gosh...seems that the poor dead Brazilian - (rcareaga) - (90)
         Curious. - (mmoffitt) - (68)
             You're already way more fucked than we will ever be. - (pwhysall) - (66)
                 You elected the guy who let himself get ROLLED by that. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (3)
                     We'll self-correct, as we did post-Thatcher. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                         This is sad. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                             ICLRPDee (new thread) - (Ashton)
                 Show me where. - (mmoffitt) - (61)
                     DevAdvo:Don't tell jokes going through airport security. :-/ - (Another Scott) - (60)
                         Except the UK is already there, man. - (mmoffitt) - (59)
                             Fight The Powah! - (pwhysall) - (58)
                                 look at the bright side, less bystander deaths on your end -NT - (boxley)
                                 Re: Shoot-to-kill is nothing new on either side of the pond. - (mmoffitt) - (25)
                                     What makes you think there hasn't been tremendous public - (jake123) - (24)
                                         Linky to tremendous public outcry? -NT - (jb4) - (23)
                                             Well, it's big news here - (jake123) - (22)
                                                 Touch\ufffd! -NT - (Ashton)
                                                 Non sequitor. - (mmoffitt) - (20)
                                                     Yeah, the son was only shot in the back - (jake123)
                                                     WTF!! what x-files episode were you watching to get that - (boxley) - (18)
                                                         Nit: ATF ninjas, not FBI, IIRC. -NT - (jake123) - (17)
                                                             feebs - (boxley) - (16)
                                                                 FBI it is - (jake123) - (2)
                                                                     have you read "from freedom to slavery"? by the lawyer -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         Think that must have been it. - (jake123)
                                                                 Thank you for making my point about the difference. - (mmoffitt) - (12)
                                                                     I see, guilty until shot by cops -NT - (boxley) - (9)
                                                                         Not at all. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                                                             what was the circumstance of his prior acts? -NT - (boxley) - (7)
                                                                                 IIRC it was carrying a rifle in his truck. -NT - (jake123) - (6)
                                                                                     make him look, it was balatent entrapment -NT - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                                         Wasn't aware that carrying a rifle in your truck was illegal - (jake123) - (4)
                                                                                             It isn't. And that is NOT REMOTELY what it was. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                                                                 Yeah, after all, a "man in fatigues" is immediately - (jake123) - (2)
                                                                                                     DOJ Report on Ruby Ridge. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                                         if that is a statement of fact I now must turn raellian - (boxley)
                                                                     That hardly covers his wife and son. - (jake123) - (1)
                                                                         See Edit above ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                 One more thing. Your attitude is scary. - (mmoffitt) - (30)
                                     When was the last time you demonstrated on behalf of someone - (jake123) - (1)
                                         Well... - (jb4)
                                     Re: One more thing. Your attitude is scary. - (pwhysall) - (27)
                                         pay attention marlowe you might learn something -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Thanks, I think... -NT - (pwhysall)
                                         Again, a mischaracterization. - (mmoffitt) - (24)
                                             Goes to show you: Ben Franklin wasn't a Brit... -NT - (jb4) - (1)
                                                 ;0) -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                             Shoot to kill is fine, in the USA - (pwhysall) - (21)
                                                 Excuse me, but can you give me a linky to... - (jb4) - (20)
                                                     You keep your tongue away from my ass - (pwhysall) - (19)
                                                         Hmmmm...not an Iraqi in the bunch. Thanks for playing.... -NT - (jb4) - (15)
                                                             You're being intentionally obtuse here. - (jake123) - (9)
                                                                 I rather don't think so - (jb4) - (8)
                                                                     s/continent/planet/ - (pwhysall) - (7)
                                                                         Ididn't know the USA constituted the whole planet! - (jb4) - (6)
                                                                             Re: Ididn't know the USA constituted the whole planet! - (pwhysall)
                                                                             I can parse that for you: - (CRConrad) - (4)
                                                                                 Mah-noor! - (jb4) - (3)
                                                                                     Your noor, indeed, not mahn. They're placed *exactly* right. -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                                                                         And all this time, I was amazed at your mastery... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                                                             The question wasn't about the WORD, "fine"... - (CRConrad)
                                                             Point being... - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                 its more a shoot in the general direction of the subject -NT - (boxley)
                                                                 The difference is we insist on cause. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                     if they are as dark as that brazillian that is cause -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         And when that happens, riots ensue. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                         Interesting choice that third one. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                             If it validates your worldview. - (pwhysall)
                                                         ICLRPD - (imqwerky)
             Beg to compare absurdities, before experiencing that 'lump' - (Ashton)
         Yo! warmachine! Need I say it...? - (jb4) - (20)
             Go ahead - (warmachine) - (19)
                 small villa in Majorca maybe where benny hill is your waiter -NT - (boxley)
                 It ain't no fun if it's solicited, but since you asked... - (jb4) - (17)
                     Explain why! -NT - (warmachine) - (16)
                         You ARE kidding, right? - (jb4) - (15)
                             It's no different over there - (pwhysall) - (12)
                                 Ahem. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (ben_tilly)
                                 It has nothing to do with smug - (jb4) - (9)
                                     Have you *read* USA-PATRIOT? - (pwhysall) - (8)
                                         sorry dude - (jb4) - (7)
                                             I'm not defending anything - (pwhysall) - (6)
                                                 s/if not more// -NT - (jb4) - (5)
                                                     You sure? - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                         I think he meant... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                             Oh, yuo aer teh funneh! - (pwhysall)
                                                         Lets try: s/if not more/as/ - (jb4) - (1)
                                                             "s/if not more fucked that/as fucked as/" HTH! -NT - (CRConrad)
                             Better -NT - (warmachine)
                             s /dense pill/Dunce pill/ Save CRC the trouble. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)

Oh look... it's a dork!
221 ms