Wait a minute.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #219,665 by ubernostrum 8/16/05 11:33:04 PM 8/16/05 11:36:32 PM Reply	Wait a minute. So she recommends that the derivative work be distributed v2 and only v2, in other words, that the work be pinned to v2, and this is a vindication of your position? \r\n\r\n Please tell me I'm just misinterpreting where this stands in the (now-enormous and hard to follow) thread. --\r\nYou cooin' with my bird? \r\n[link\|http://www.shtuff.us/\|shtuff] Edited by ubernostrum Aug. 16, 2005, 11:36:32 PM EDT Wait a minute. So she recommends that the derivative work be distributed v2 and only v2, in other words, that the work be pinned to v2, and this is a vindication of your position? Ben, what world do you live in? -- You cooin' with my bird? [link\|http://www.shtuff.us/\|shtuff] Collapse All History
Post #219,667 by altmann 8/17/05 12:11:52 AM Reply	Not quite. It was a followup to my assertion that one can't take a program license "GPLv2 or later" and modify and distribute it as "GPLv2 only" to downlevel recipients. Ben and the lawyer's opinion is that one can do that as long as one keeps the original copyright notice intact, thereby leaving the original code to be under "GPLv2 or later" and one's modifications to be explicitly under GPLv2 (think the later was part of your reasoning, please correct me if I'm wrong). Having read some other opinions on it I'm starting to gravitate to their side on that, but for some reason it doesn't "feel" right. Then my eyes glazed over and I found I didn't really care that much :) -- Chris Altmann
Post #219,668 by ben_tilly 8/17/05 12:36:15 AM Reply	You got it I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)

More good points - (imric) - (66) - Aug. 9, 2005, 08:47:45 AM EDT

Re: More good points - (ubernostrum) - (63) - Aug. 9, 2005, 09:24:25 AM EDT

Technical mistake - (ben_tilly) - (61) - Aug. 9, 2005, 11:45:07 AM EDT

I'm not so sure - (ubernostrum) - (60) - Aug. 9, 2005, 11:06:11 PM EDT

Nope. Talk to a lawyer. - (ben_tilly) - (59) - Aug. 9, 2005, 11:40:55 PM EDT

That's the thing - (ubernostrum) - (58) - Aug. 10, 2005, 12:06:11 PM EDT

You've missed the point, let me simplify - (ben_tilly) - (57) - Aug. 10, 2005, 12:14:55 PM EDT

How do modifications/contributions work, then? - (ubernostrum) - (56) - Aug. 10, 2005, 02:42:18 PM EDT

Any lawyer will tell you that that is a non-issue - (ben_tilly) - (55) - Aug. 10, 2005, 04:15:31 PM EDT

Doesn't change anything - (ubernostrum) - (54) - Aug. 11, 2005, 01:07:49 AM EDT

I suggest that you talk to a lawyer if you're concerned - (ben_tilly) - (53) - Aug. 11, 2005, 03:02:43 AM EDT

OK, bad wording. - (ubernostrum) - (52) - Aug. 11, 2005, 07:53:53 AM EDT

Again, you're not a lawyer. Don't try to play one. - (ben_tilly) - (51) - Aug. 11, 2005, 04:40:50 PM EDT

A question - (ubernostrum) - (50) - Aug. 11, 2005, 11:22:21 PM EDT

Answer - (ben_tilly) - (49) - Aug. 11, 2005, 11:50:54 PM EDT

But it does - (ubernostrum) - (48) - Aug. 12, 2005, 01:26:20 AM EDT

I granted one point, not the other - (ben_tilly) - (47) - Aug. 12, 2005, 02:49:19 AM EDT

Let's try it again, then - (ubernostrum) - (44) - Aug. 12, 2005, 08:44:26 AM EDT

Ahh, now I get you - (drewk) - (4) - Aug. 12, 2005, 10:01:35 AM EDT

Not quite - (ubernostrum) - (3) - Aug. 12, 2005, 11:02:24 AM EDT

I'm trying to figure out why you don't "get" this - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Aug. 12, 2005, 11:24:24 AM EDT

Modifications are only made under the terms of one license - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2005, 03:06:19 PM EDT

Where does the GPL v2 say that? - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 12, 2005, 04:56:02 PM EDT

Step 4 is wrong. - (ben_tilly) - (38) - Aug. 12, 2005, 11:12:17 AM EDT

Re: Step 4 is wrong. - (ubernostrum) - (37) - Aug. 12, 2005, 05:02:28 PM EDT

Re: Step 4 is wrong. - (altmann) - (11) - Aug. 12, 2005, 05:27:11 PM EDT

Half-right - (ben_tilly) - (10) - Aug. 12, 2005, 05:34:54 PM EDT

Not so sure. - (altmann) - (9) - Aug. 12, 2005, 06:22:43 PM EDT

Hrm... - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Aug. 12, 2005, 06:55:15 PM EDT

You can mix it, but wouldn't it all become v2 only? - (drewk) - (3) - Aug. 15, 2005, 03:56:42 PM EDT

Yabut.. - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Aug. 15, 2005, 04:27:16 PM EDT

Depends on which came first - (drewk) - (1) - Aug. 15, 2005, 05:42:03 PM EDT

Read atcroft's question again - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 15, 2005, 05:48:36 PM EDT

Well, my instincts don't seem bad... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Aug. 15, 2005, 12:29:22 PM EDT

Wait a minute. - (ubernostrum) - (2) - Aug. 16, 2005, 11:36:32 PM EDT

Not quite. - (altmann) - (1) - Aug. 17, 2005, 12:11:52 AM EDT

You got it -NT - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 17, 2005, 12:36:15 AM EDT

Step 7 in your logic is wrong - (ben_tilly) - (24) - Aug. 12, 2005, 05:30:24 PM EDT

Re: Step 7 in your logic is wrong - (ubernostrum) - (23) - Aug. 12, 2005, 07:50:19 PM EDT

You are not doing that though! - (ben_tilly) - (22) - Aug. 12, 2005, 09:54:15 PM EDT

Re: You are not doing that though! - (ubernostrum) - (21) - Aug. 13, 2005, 12:43:53 AM EDT

BUT YOU'RE NOT IMPOSING!!! - (ben_tilly) - (19) - Aug. 13, 2005, 01:21:33 AM EDT

BUT FREEDOM MUST BE FREE! - (ubernostrum) - (18) - Aug. 13, 2005, 01:52:06 AM EDT

Are you actively trying to be stupid? - (ben_tilly) - (17) - Aug. 13, 2005, 02:23:48 AM EDT

This is entertaining; but weirdly hypothetical, isn't it? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 13, 2005, 10:16:58 AM EDT

Here's some clarifications on your take. - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 13, 2005, 01:31:02 PM EDT

Your mother was a hamster - (ubernostrum) - (8) - Aug. 13, 2005, 06:53:02 PM EDT

Interesting - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Aug. 13, 2005, 11:53:46 PM EDT

Ben, you ignorant slut - (ubernostrum) - (6) - Aug. 14, 2005, 01:32:24 AM EDT

Your intended point was not what you accomplished - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Aug. 14, 2005, 11:33:09 PM EDT

Riddle me this - (ubernostrum) - (4) - Aug. 15, 2005, 12:18:10 AM EDT

The riddle is trivial - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Aug. 15, 2005, 01:29:00 AM EDT

Ah, Ben, you didn't meditate. - (ubernostrum) - (2) - Aug. 15, 2005, 04:05:40 AM EDT

I don't know of anywhere that this has been asked - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 15, 2005, 12:47:40 PM EDT

Future versions don't have to remain compatible - (drewk) - Aug. 15, 2005, 03:52:31 PM EDT

And your father smelt of elderberries - (ubernostrum) - (3) - Aug. 13, 2005, 07:04:13 PM EDT

And you have the brains of a chihuahua - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Aug. 14, 2005, 12:08:36 AM EDT

See, here's the thing - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Aug. 14, 2005, 01:37:51 AM EDT

That is a misunderstanding I hadn't quite anticipated - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 15, 2005, 01:41:06 AM EDT

Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Aug. 13, 2005, 07:12:57 PM EDT

What do the other definitions say? - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 14, 2005, 12:20:07 AM EDT

What does this mean? - (drewk) - Aug. 15, 2005, 12:06:51 AM EDT

Re: I granted one point, not the other - (bepatient) - (1) - Aug. 12, 2005, 09:26:38 AM EDT

No, we really are arguing different points - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 12, 2005, 11:13:55 AM EDT

Well, the actual draft isn't available yet. - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 12:19:51 PM EDT

I don't really have a dog in this fight - (hnick) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 09:43:46 AM EDT

Actually they started as extremists -NT - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 9, 2005, 11:42:33 AM EDT

Sweet baby Jesus on a skateboard, that's all that matters.
94 ms