PS Your PM question not only got answers, it also showed up on "Best Nodes of the Day". There was no need to be concerned. :-)
Aye, that it did. And they were helpful, too.
Now if I could just get the rest of this stupid script working...
Why geeks shouldn't reproduce?
- (ben_tilly)
- (27)
- Dec. 17, 2001, 09:59:12 PM EST
Re: Why geeks shouldn't reproduce?
- (admin)
- Dec. 17, 2001, 11:08:02 PM EST
Test
- (broomberg)
- (16)
- Dec. 17, 2001, 11:41:02 PM EST
Re Test
- (slugbug)
- (5)
- Dec. 17, 2001, 11:54:52 PM EST
34
-NT
- (Steve Lowe)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 12:20:47 AM EST
5
-NT
- (Andrew Grygus)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 01:29:26 AM EST
I had skipped it earlier
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 06:51:15 AM EST
I couldn't pass it up
- (broomberg)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 01:28:56 PM EST
34
-NT
- (bluke)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 08:58:12 AM EST
Re: Test
- (admin)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 12:04:28 AM EST
7
- (Silverlock)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 09:04:52 AM EST
16 but I knew that
-NT
- (boxley)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 09:29:43 AM EST
29
-NT
- (inthane-chan)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 11:24:28 AM EST
I only got a 29
- (marlowe)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 02:26:05 PM EST
28 - whatever it means.
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 04:07:19 PM EST
12
- (Yendor)
- (2)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 04:17:59 PM EST
It may matter
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 04:24:24 PM EST
Re: It may matter
- (Yendor)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 06:14:23 PM EST
Re: Test
- (bepatient)
- Dec. 19, 2001, 12:29:01 PM EST
Thanks again, Mr. Darwin..
- (Ashton)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 12:05:32 AM EST
Re: Why geeks shouldn't reproduce?
- (wharris2)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 12:50:01 AM EST
Too Late
- (tuberculosis)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 01:35:55 AM EST
19
- (drewk)
- (2)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 02:02:22 PM EST
Daughter prognosis
- (Ashton)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 05:02:48 PM EST
Almost the exact opposite: 17 INTP
- (tseliot)
- Dec. 19, 2001, 11:43:25 AM EST
12
- (Ashton)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 05:17:39 PM EST
I'm someway up the curve.
- (static)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 09:09:32 PM EST
Nine, says the test.
-NT
- (Meerkat)
- Dec. 18, 2001, 09:18:06 PM EST